Role of cytology in cancer screening (Citi Screen Experience)

Authors

BM. Petrikovsky
Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the Maimonides Medical Center & State University of New York, Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York USA.

Article Information

*Corresponding Author: BM. Petrikovsky, Former, Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the Maimonides Medical Center & State University of New York, Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York USA.

Received: October 28, 2021                                
Accepted: November 02, 2021
Published: November 15, 2021

Citation: BM. Petrikovsky. (2021) “Role of cytology in cancer screening (Citiscreen experience)”, J Oncology and Cancer Screening, 3(4); DOI: http;//doi.org/010.2021/1.1044.
Copyright: © 2021 BM. Petrikovsky. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Papanicolaou (PAP) smears started the revolution of the cytopathology field. Recently, gynecologists are moving to fluid-based technology, which provides more accurate interpretation and allows for molecular testing for the HPV infection


Keywords:

Introduction:
Papanicolaou (PAP) smears started the revolution of the cytopathology field. Recently, gynecologists are moving to fluid-based technology, which provides more accurate interpretation and allows for molecular testing for the HPV infection. [1,3]

Besides PAP smears, cytology is successfully used for detection of other malignancies, such as:

  1. Respiratory/exfoliative cytology (bronchial washing, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, and bronchial brushing). Those are used to detect lung cancer.
  2. Urinary cytology (urine cytology, bladder washing, and brushing cytology). Kits utilizing the Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) are already in use [4,7].
  3. Body cytology (pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, peritoneal fluid, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology). Those are mainly used to detect malignancies.
  4. Gastrointestinal Tract: Sampling the mucosa is a routine procedure during endoscopy.
  5. Discharge cytology: The most common example is nipple discharge used as a screening for breast cancer.

Detection of premalignant oral lesion improves the survival and the morbidity of patients. Cytological study of oral cells is a technique that is an attractive option for the early diagnosis of oral cancer. [8] Obvious advantages of cytology are fourfold: cheap, quick, safe, and simple. Advances in cytology research led to the development of more sophisticated techniques which may be summarized as follows: [9]

  1. Regular smears.
  2. Cytocentrifuge smears. This method concentrates cells and is advantageous when few cells are present.
  3. Centrifuge smears using membrane filters. This method utilizes paper filter with small pores to trap contaminating material.
  4. Monolayer liquid-based cytology. The smears are superior to their conventional ones and also allow testing for viral DNA.

Diagnostic Pitfalls:

[8] No single cell characteristic is pathognomonic of malignancy. The following are cytological signs of possible premalignant or malignant disease: High cellularity, increased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, prominent and large nucleoli, increased mitotic activity, nuclear membrane abnormalities, cellular and nuclear pleomorphism among others. As a rule, cytological assessment, if abnormal requires confirmation via definite histology. Technical problems (inadequate sampling, poor fixation, etc.,) make cytological diagnosis challenging at times. Cellular changes (inflammation, necrosis, atypical appearances, etc.,) may be due to non-neoplastic conditions (infection, trauma, infarction, hemorrhage, etc.,) and require an experienced cytologist.

Smears in Gynecology:

The most popular and well recognized screening technique is the PAP smear in cervical cancer prevention. Very few in the medical community, let alone general public, know that pioneering authors (Papanicolaou and Traut) targeted endometrial rather than cervical cancer. [10,11] Since 10-15% of uterine cancers are detected in premenopausal women, we suggested a new screening test based on the endometrial cells’ evaluation. The endometrial cells were obtained from the menstrual content of menstrual pads, cups, and intravaginal tampons, [12, 13] Later this technique was expanded to obtaining smear from the content of post-menopausal bleeding. [13] Studies have suggested that endometrial cells on cytology in women over 40 years of age may be correlated with a greater risk of endometrial pathology. [14, 15] In 2001, the Bethesda System for cervical cytology recommended the reporting of endometrial glandular cells identified in the PAP tests of women ³ 40 years of age. [16] These cells may be found in the cervical smear. [17,18] Thin-layer Pap tests have a sensitivity of 88.3% and a specificity of 87.5% for the detection of endometrial carcinoma. [19] The cytological distinctions among normal endometrial cells and adenocarcinoma are well established: enlarged nuclei and presence of nucleoli in abnormal endometrial cells, variation of nuclear size, coarse chromatin, and irregular nuclear membrane. [19] In the absence of abnormal cells, the presence of normal endometrial cells did not increase the risk of endometrial malignancy. Adding the results of the PAP smear to endometrial thickness could detect incidental endometrial cancers that are missed by transvaginal sonography. [20] Citiscreen incorporates a number of smears (urine, cervical, dental, etc.,) into its screening protocols. [21] Further advances in cytology will allow for more accurate utilization of these safe and reliable technologies into cancer screening algorithms. [22]

References

  1. Schiller CL, Nicholov AG, Kaul KL et al. High-risk human papillomavirus detection: a split-sample comparison of hybrid capture and chromogenic in situ hybridization. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 121:537-545.
  2. Matthews-Greer J, Rivette D, Reyes R et al. Human papillomavirus detection: verification with cervical cytology. Clin Lab Sci 2004; 17:8-11.
  3. Yarkin R, Chauvin S, Konomi N et al. Detection of HPV DNA in cervical specimens collected in cytologic solution by ligation-dependent PCR. Acta Cytol 2003; 47:450-456.
  4. Quddus MR, Zhang S, Sung CJ et al. Utility of HPV DNA detection in thin-layer, liquid-based tests with atypical squamous metaplasia. Acta Cytol 2002; 46:808-812.
  5. Degtyar P, Neulander E, Zirkin H et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on exfoliated urothelial cells in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J. Urol 2004; 63:398-401.
  6. Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer P, Bokinsky G et al. Clinical evaluation of a milti-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 2002; 168:1950-1954.
  7. Yamamoto D, Shoji T, Kawanishi H et al. A utility of ductography and fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 70:103-108.
  8. Kaur M, Saxena S, Samantha YP et al. Usefulness of oral exfoliative cytology in dental practice. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2013;7(3)161-165.
  9. Al-Abbadi MA. Basics of Cytology.
  10. Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF the diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941; 42:193.
  11. Traut HT. Papanicolaou GN Cancer of the uterus: the vaginal smear in its diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 59(2):121-122.
  12. Petrikovsky BM. PET smear: will it ever work? NCMC Proceedings. 2000. 6:22-26.
  13. Petrikovsky BM. Menstrual smear can be used to screen for endometrial pathology. W J Gynecol Women’s Health. 2019. 2(5).
  14. Zucker PK, Kasdon EJ, Feldstein ML The validity of Pap smear parameters as predictors of endometrial pathology in menopausal women. Cancer 1985; 56:2256-2263.
  15. Gondos B. King EB. Significance of endometrial cells in cervicovaginal smears. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1977; 7:486-490.
  16. Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. New York: Springer- Verlag, 2004.
  17. Vooijs GP, van der Gy C, Vooigs GL. Endome trial cells in cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception. Acta Cytol 1987; 31:427-433.
  18. Ferenczy A, Bergeron C: Histology of the human endometrium: from birth to senescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 622:6-27.
  19. Zhou J, Tomashefski J, Jr, Khiyami A. Diagnostic value of the thin layer, liquid-based Pap test in endometrial cancer: a retrospective study with emphasis on cytomorphologic features. Acta Cytol 2007; 51:735-741.
  20. Van Doorn HC, Opmear BC, Kooi GS. Value of cervical cytology in diagnosing endometrial carcinoma in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Cytol 2009, 53, 3;280-286.
  21. Petrikovsky BM. Citiscreen cancer screening: an update. J Oncol & Cancer Screen. 2021, 2(1)3-6.
  22. Petrikovsky BM. Cancer screening in the 21 Century. Eliva Press 2021.