Aditum genuinely value the difficult task of reviewers for improving the quality of proposed articles all the way through a peer review process and thus escalating journals standards and enabling our platform to take part in a creditable role in contributing to intellectual literature. We believe that your idealistic views progress the scientific quality of articles to be published.
As gratitude, we recognize and certify the reviewer certificate for all your efforts in receiving the quality article to the scientific society. Due to your continuous support and involvement Aditum has been able to publish valuable content in as many as 15 journals.
Editorial Board members can choose the reviewer based on the expertise within the scope of the article; and its reviewer decision to accept the invitation based on their feasibility. Any delay in completing the review of the manuscript within the scheduled time information should be given to the editorial coordinator.

Code of Conduct

Reviewers must stay fair, impartial and withhold bias in judgment and projected to take steps conscientiously in providing constructive analysis, which the authors should find supportive in addressing whichever issues with the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

State any contradictory or competing interests that will impact your review of a manuscript. Inform the editorial board immediately and decline yourself from the request to review if necessary.

Decision Making

Reviewers can take their decision and should be informed by the scientific merit of a manuscript in any of the aspects like to [Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, Reject]. Include comments with your final decision and spell out any additional requirements or revisions you expect from the authors.

Final Decision

The Editor-in-Chief has the ultimate state in deciding whether an article should be published. The EiC will take your comments into account while judging the suitability and originality of a manuscript. You must respect the decision made by EiC.


Aditum is following double-blind peer-review standards, reviewers must not attempt to make any contact with the author and maintain anonymity. You must keep the manuscripts confidential, do not share any relevant file or data with anyone outside the review team.

Reviewer Benefits

We do not pay reviewers, but we do provide benefits to our reviewers which credits to their activities. We are immensely appreciative to our reviewers, which is why we make sure to recognize their hard work and extend due credit to make sure their service is recognized among research and scientific society. We offer discounts to the reviewers on apc to publish their article in our journals.