Cannabinoids Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease: New Therapeutic Perspectives

Authors

Stefano Marini
National Health Service, Department of Mental Health, Termoli, Italy.

Article Information

*Corresponding Author: Stefano Marini, National Health Service, Department of Mental Health, Termoli, Italy.

Received Date: August 20, 2024
Accepted Date: August 30, 2024
Published Date: September 04, 2024

Citation: Stefano Marini. (2024) “ Cannabinoids Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease: New Therapeutic Perspectives.”, International Journal of Medical Case Reports and Medical Research, 3(4); DOI: 10.61148/2994-6905/IJMCRMR/056.
Copyright: © 2024. Stefano Marini. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative pathology determined by the presence of extracellular deposits of Beta-Amyloid and by the hyper-phosphorylation of the tau protein. More than 50 million people are affected by AD worldwide. The Endocannabinoid System is a complex molecular/biological system implicated in several physiological processes. From published data, alterations in the Endocannabinoid system in Alzheimer’s disease emerged. To date, the drugs approved for the treatment of AD are based on acetylcholine esterase (AChE) inhibitors or are non-competitive antagonists of the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. New promising therapeutic perspectives emerge from compounds acting on the Endocannabinoid system, but clinical studies conducted on people with Alzheimer's disease are still numerically scarce. Further studies are needed to evaluate the real risks and benefits of the therapeutic use of these compounds for the treatment of the clinical aspects of Alzheimer's disease.


Keywords: alzheimer’s disease; cannabinoids; perspectives

Introduction:
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative pathology and represents the most common type of dementia, characterized by a progressive loss of memory, visual-spatial and complex cognitive abilities, such as language and reasoning, which progressively lead to a total inability to carry out any type of daily activity. [1,2].

AD is ultimately fatal due to complications such as immobility, swallowing problems and malnutrition which greatly increase the risk of acute fatal conditions such as pneumonia and vascular changes [3].

Since one of the main risk factors for AD is aging and the human lifespan is constantly increasing, the number of Alzheimer's cases is expected to double in the following decades. Actually, more than 50 million people are affected by AD worldwide [4].

The progression of AD from initial brain changes to brain changes that cause memory problems and finally physical disability is called the Alzheimer's continuum [5]. The symptom continuum includes three major phases: a) the preclinical phase, b) the mild cognitive impairment phase, c) the dementia phase.

The Alzheimer's dementia stage is further divided into mild, moderate, and severe stages, which reflect the degree to which symptoms interfere with the ability to carry out activities of daily living [6,7,8,9]. The time people spend in each stage of the continuum is variable and individual as it is influenced by age, genetics, gender and other factors [10]. Although the rate of symptom progression can vary, the average life expectancy after diagnosis is between three and nine years [11,12].

AD can also be divided, based on the pathophysiological aspects, into a) Sporadic (or late-onset) and b) familial (or early onset). Both sporadic and familial AD develop a similar pathology consisting of parenchymal deposition of Beta-amyloid (Aβ) in plaques and intra-neuronal accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau protein, leading to brain inflammation and oxidative stress that have a fundamental impact on the onset of the disease [13,14].

The scientific literature recognizes two distinctive etiopathological aspects of AD: a) the presence of extracellular deposits of Beta-Amyloid (Aβ) in Alzheimer's brains [15] and b) hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein associated with cytoskeletal microtubules [16].

The Endogenous Cannabinoid System (or Endocannabinoid System, ECS) is a complex molecular/biological system implicated in several physiological processes [17,18,19,20,21,22,23].

The ECS consists of two primary cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) and two primary neurotransmitters of endogenous cannabinoids, commonly called Endocannabinoids: N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA or anandamide) [24]  and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) [25].

In addition to endocannabinoids, other substances act as ligands for ECS receptors and are represented by phytocannabinoids and synthetic compounds derived from them. Cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) are the most intensively studied phytocannabinoids.

∆9-THC (for simplicity THC) is the main psychoactive component of cannabis. THC has a similar affinity for both CB1 and CB2 receptors, although most of the psychoactive effects of THC are related to the activation of CB1 receptors [26]. Chronic and acute intoxication by marijuana, and consequently by THC, has often been associated with several adverse effects, such as a reduction in most cognitive functions, learning, memory, attention and executive functions [27], and in some vulnerable subjects, an increased risk of both psychotic symptoms and schizophrenia-like psychosis [28].

Unlike THC, CBD has no psychotropic properties [29]. CBD has a very low affinity with the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Numerous results have highlighted that CBD acts as an allosteric modulator both in the CB1 and CB2 receptors [30,31,32].

There are other potentially therapeutic phytocannabinoids, which have been tested in pre-clinical studies, represented by: ∆8-tetrahydrocannabinol [33], Cannabinol [34], Cannabigerol [35], Cannabichromene [36], ∆9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (∆ 9-THCV) [37] and Cannabidivarin (CBDV) [38].

From published data, alterations in the cannabinoid receptors and in the enzymes responsible for the degradation of endocannabinoids in AD emerge, even if some data is conflicting [39,40].

Materials and Methods:

A literature search was conducted on major databases to find useful studies for the purposes of this paper.

Discussion:
The recreational and pharmacological properties of marijuana have been known since ancient times. The first texts documenting the medical benefits of marijuana date back to a Chinese medical manual from 2700 BC. about. [41].

In recent decades, scientific literature has deepened research on the chemical properties of the active ingredients in marijuana extract, but recently attention has focused on understanding the biological mechanism involved in their multiple effects. Most of the accumulating evidence supporting the potential therapeutic utility of cannabinoids in AD has been obtained using cellular and animal models that mimic a variety of AD-related changes.

Information obtained from literature data suggests that cannabinoids and substances that act on degradation enzymes can have multiple effects on AD by acting as antioxidants and anti-inflammatories, modulating a notable number of factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of AD such as altered Aβ plaques metabolism and autophagy. Aso and Ferrer [42] classified the results obtained into six areas: a) Effects on Aβ plaques; b) Effects on TAU hyper-phosphorylation; c) Anti-inflammatory properties; d) Actions on mitochondria activity; e) Modulation of neuro-transmission; f) Other effects (for a summary, see Table 1).

Effects on Aβ plaques

Ruiz-Valdepeñas et al. 2010 [43]

van der Stelt et al. 2006 [44]

vitro

mice

neuroprotection against Aβ plaques

Haghani et al. 2012 [45]

Wu et al. 2013 [46]

Martín-Moreno et al. 2011 [47]

rats

rats

vitro/mice

neuroprotection against Aβ plaques and prevention of memory deficit

Tolón et al. 2009 [48]

vitro

clearance of Aβ plaques by human macrophages

Martín-Moreno et al. 2012 [49]

mice

improved Aβ plaques transport across the choroid plexus

Chen et al. 2013 [50]

mice

significant reduction of Aβ plaques

Effects on TAU hyper-phosphorylation

Esposito et al. 2006a [51]

Esposito et al. 2006b [52]

Aso et al. 2013 [53]

vitro

vitro

mice

inhibition of tau protein hyper-phosphorylation

Casarejos et al. 2013 [54]

mice

Sativex administration reduced tau protein deposition

Anti-inflammatory properties

Ramirez et al. 2005 [55]

Esposito et al 2007 [56]

Fakhfouri et al. 2012 [57]

rats

vitro/rats

rats

reduced microglial response and the production of pro-inflammatory molecules

Aso et al. 2012 [58]

mice

reduced astrocytic expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-γ

Piro et al. 2012 [59]

mice

attenuated neuroinflammation

Benito et al. 2012 [60]

mice

increased cytokine concentrations and apoptosis.

Actions on mitochondria activity

Hampson et al. 1998 [61]

Hampson et al. 2000 [62]

vitro

vitro

antioxidant properties by reducing free radical production and lipid peroxidation.

Esposito et al. 2011 [63]

rats

reduced nitric oxide levels as well as the expression of iNOS

Athanasiou et al. 2007 [64]

vitro

reduced oxygen consumption and mitochondrial membrane potential

Modulation of neuro-transmission

Feigenbaum et al. 1989 [65]

Eshhar et al. 1993 [66]

Nadler et al. 1993 [67]

rats

vitro

vitro

protection from NMDA-induced neurotoxicity by the synthetic cannabinoid HU-211

Eubanks et al. 2006 [68]

 

increasing ACh levels

Other effects (still not well clarified)

Noonan et al. 2010 [69]

vitro

reduction of apoptotic signaling

Tanveer et al. 2012 [70]

rats

neurogenesis stimulation

Khaspekov et al. 2004 [71]

vitro

increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)

Casarejos et al. 2013 [72]

mice

beneficial effects on autophagy

Wagner et al. 2001 [73]

Iring et al. 2013 [74]

rats

rats

increase cerebral blood flow

Table 1: Six areas of effects

Although the data obtained so far are hopeful, the confirmation of the clinical efficacy of cannabinoids and the clarification of the underlying molecular mechanisms have yet to be fully identified [75], lacking efficacy data from randomized clinical trials.

To date, no cannabinoid compound has yet been approved for the treatment and/or management of AD symptoms. There are still few clinical studies completed evaluating the use of synthetic derivatives of THC (dronabinol and nabilone) and CBD.

In the literature, clinical studies using cannabinoids to treat consequences and comorbidities of AD, such as anxiety, agitation and depression are numerically scarce. Nabilone reduced the severity of agitation in a 72-year-old man with cognitive decline [76]. A randomized study reported that dronabinol was more effective than placebo in reducing agitation and was well tolerated with adverse events no different from placebo in patients with AD [77]. In addition, dronabinol was effective in 15 patients who refused food. Adverse reactions included euphoria, drowsiness, and fatigue, but did not require discontinuation of therapy [78]. Nabilone and dronabinol were found to be more potent THC analogs acting on CB1 and CB2 receptors and reducing general agitation in AD patients [79]. Another study examining the effectiveness of nabilone as a potential treatment for psychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease similarly found an overall decrease in agitation and sometimes even aggression [80]. A study found that co-administration of CBD and THC is necessary to provide the beneficial elements of cannabis while attempting to reduce some of the side effects of THC in Alzheimer's patients. [81]. CBD is considered particularly beneficial in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease as it lacks psychoactive properties and does not risk further damage to cognitive decline in Alzheimer's patients [82]. Cannabis, it seems, can help restore the cognitive dysfunctions characteristic of AD [83]. Dronabinol administration reduced nocturnal activity and strengthened circadian rhythms [84].

Considerable clinical potential emerges in the use of cannabinoids in AD which is not yet supported by clinical evidence as the number of randomized clinical trials is almost absent and does not allow the real clinical efficacy to be determined. Indeed, cannabinoids were often used in conjunction with other pharmacological therapies, leading to poor methodological rigor in the studies themselves. In addition, the studies carried out were conducted on small sample sizes, undermining the real significance of the data reported. Furthermore, there is a lack of longitudinal studies that take into consideration any short and long-term side effects of cannabinoid therapy.

Acknowledgments:

This paper was entirely funded by the author, and no pharmaceutical companies were informed of or were involved in the paper. The author has no potential conflict of interests that are directly relevant to the contents of the paper.

Conclusions:

The authors took into consideration the in vitro and in vivo research on murine models of the use of cannabinoids for the etiological aspects of Alzheimer's disease. Finally, clinical studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease present in the literature were presented. Encouraging and positive aspects have certainly emerged in the possible and future therapeutic use of cannabinoids in the pathological evolution of Alzheimer's disease, but at present, the data in the literature is too scarce to be able to highlight real therapeutic effects. Furthermore, rigorous studies from a methodological point of view and with a larger sample size are therefore necessary to be able to evaluate the real risks and benefits of the therapeutic use of cannabinoids in Alzheimer's disease.

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018, 14, 367–429.
  2. Rubio-Perez, J.M.; Morillas-Ruiz, J.M. A Review: Inflammatory process in Alzheimer’s disease, role of cytokines. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 1–15.  
  3. Brunnstrom HR, Englund EM. Cause of death in patients with dementia disorders. Eur J Neurol 2009;16(4):488-92.
  4. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 88–106. 
  5. Aisen PS, Cummings J, Jack CR Jr, Morris JC, Sperling R, Frölich L, Jones RW, Dowsett SA, Matthews BR, Raskin J, Scheltens P, Dubois B. On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer's disease continuum. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Aug 9;9(1):60.
  6. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s dis- ease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7(3):280-92.
  7. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox N, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7(3):270-9.
  8. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s dis- ease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7(3):263-9.
  9. Jack CR, Albert MS, Knopman DS, McKhann GM, Sperling RA, Carrillo MC, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7(3):257- 62.
  10. Vermunt L, Sikkes SAM, van den Hout A, Handels R, Bos I, van der Flier WM, et al. Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype. Alzheimers Dement 2019;15:888-98.
  11. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM (January 2010). "Alzheimer's disease". The New England Journal of Medicine. 362 (4): 329–344.
  12. Todd S, Barr S, Roberts M, Passmore AP (November 2013). "Survival in dementia and predictors of mortality: a review". International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 28 (11): 1109–1124.
  13. Serrano-Pozo, A.; Frosch, M.P.; Masliah, E.; Hyman, B.T. Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2011, 1, a006189.  
  14. Abate, G.; Vezzoli, M.; Sandri, M.; Rungratanawanich, W.; Memo, M.; Uberti, D. Mitochondria and cellular redox state on the route from ageing to Alzheimer’s disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2020, 192, 111385.
  15. Glenner GG, Wong CW. Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;120:885–90.
  16. Kidd M. Paired helical filaments in electron microscopy of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 1963;197:192-3.
  17. Fride, E. The endocannabinoid-CB(1) receptor system in pre- and postnatal life. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 500, 289–297.
  18. Di Marzo, V.; Goparaju, S.K.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Bátkai, S.; Járai, Z.; Fezza, F.; Miura, G.I.; Palmiter, R.D.; Sugiura, T.; et al. Leptin-regulated endocannabinoids are involved in maintaining food intake. Nature 2001, 410, 822–825.
  19. Donvito, G.; Nass, S.R.; Wilkerson, J.L.; Curry, Z.A.; Schurman, L.D.; Kinsey, S.G.; Lichtman, A.H. The endogenous cannabinoid system: A budding source of targets for treating inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018, 43, 52–79.
  20. Campolongo, P.; Trezza, V. The endocannabinoid system: A key modulator of emotions and cognition. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 73.
  21. Marsicano, G.; Lafenetre, P. Roles of the endocannabinoid system in learning and memory. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 1, 201–230.
  22. Wu, J. Cannabis, cannabinoid receptors, and endocannabinoid system: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2019, 40, 297–299.
  23. Augustin SM, Lovinger DM (2018) Functional relevance of endocannabinoid-dependent synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system. ACS Chem Neurosci.
  24. Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, Gibson D, Mandelbaum A et al (1992) Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 258(5090):1946–1949.
  25. Sugiura T, Kondo S, Sukagawa A, Nakane S, Shinoda A, Itoh K, Yamashita A, Waku K (1995) 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 215(1):89–97.
  26. Pertwee, R.G. The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, 199–215.
  27. Battisti, R.A.; Roodenrys, S.; Johnstone, S.J.; Respondek, C.; Hermens, D.F.; Solowij, N. Chronic use of cannabis and poor neural efficiency in verbal memory ability. Psychopharmacology 2010, 209, 319–330.
  28. Murray, R.M.; Englund, A.; Abi-Dargham, A.; Lewis, D.A.; Di Forti, M.; Davies, C.; Sherif, M.; McGuire, P.; D’Souza, D.C. Cannabis-associated psychosis: Neural substrate and clinical impact. Neuropharmacology 2017, 124, 89–104.
  29. Woelfl, T.; Rohleder, C.; Mueller, J.K.; Lange, B.; Reuter, A.; Schmidt, A.M.; Koethe, D.; Hellmich, M.; Leweke, F.M. Effects of Cannabidiol and Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on Emotion, Cognition, and Attention: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Experimental Trial in Healthy Volunteers. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 576877.
  30. Chung, H.; Fierro, A.; Pessoa-Mahana, C.D. Cannabidiol binding and negative allosteric modulation at the cannabinoid type 1 receptor in the presence of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: An In Silico study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220025.
  31. Laprairie, R.B.; Bagher, A.M.; Kelly, M.E.M.; Denovan-Wright, E.M. Cannabidiol is a negative allosteric modulator of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 4790–4805.
  32. Tham, M.; Yilmaz, O.; Alaverdashvili, M.; Kelly, M.E.M.; Denovan-Wright, E.M.; Laprairie, R.B. Allosteric and orthosteric pharmacology of cannabidiol and cannabidiol-dimethylheptyl at the type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 1455–1469.
  33. Thapa, D.; Cairns, E.A.; Szczesniak, A.-M.; Toguri, J.T.; Caldwell, M.D.; Kelly, M.E.M. The Cannabinoids ∆8THC, CBD, and HU-308 Act via Distinct Receptors to Reduce Corneal Pain and Inflammation. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018, 3, 11–20.  
  34. Weydt, P.; Hong, S.; Witting, A.; Möller, T.; Stella, N.; Kliot, M. Cannabinol delays symptom onset in SOD1 (G93A) transgenic mice without affecting survival. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2005, 6, 182–184.
  35. Borrelli, F.; Fasolino, I.; Romano, B.; Capasso, R.; Maiello, F.; Coppola, D.; Orlando, P.; Battista, G.; Pagano, E.; Di Marzo, V.; et al. Beneficial effect of the non-psychotropic plant cannabinoid cannabigerol on experimental inflammatory bowel disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 1306–1316.
  36. Udoh, M.; Santiago, M.; Devenish, S.; McGregor, I.S.; Connor, M. Cannabichromene is a cannabinoid CB 2 receptor agonist. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 176, 4537–4547.  
  37. Cascio, M.G.; Zamberletti, E.; Marini, P.; Parolaro, D.; Pertwee, R.G. The phytocannabinoid, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabivarin, can act through 5-HT1Areceptors to produce antipsychotic effects. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2015, 172, 1305–1318.  
  38. Zamberletti, E.; Rubino, T.; Parolaro, D. Therapeutic potential of cannabidivarin for epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 226, 107878.
  39. Berry AJ, Zubko O, Reeves SJ, Howard RJ. Endocannabinoid system alterations in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of human studies. Brain Res. 2020 Dec 15;1749:147135.
  40. D’Agostino L, Ciamarra C, Gentile A, Marini S. Endocannabinoid system alterations in Alzheimer's disease: A mini-review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 22(03), 1374–1380
  41. Bonini, S.A.; Premoli, M.; Tambaro, S.; Kumar, A.; Maccarinelli, G.; Memo, M.; Mastinu, A. Cannabis sativa: A comprehensive ethnopharmacological review of a medicinal plant with a long history. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 227, 300–315.
  42. Aso E, Ferrer I. Cannabinoids for treatment of Alzheimer's disease: moving toward the clinic. Front Pharmacol. 2014 Mar 5;5:37.
  43. Ruiz-Valdepeñas, L., Benito, C., Tolón, R. M., Martínez-Orgado, J. A., and Romero, J. (2010). The endocannabinoid system and amyloid-related diseases. Exp. Neurol. 224, 66–73.
  44. van der Stelt, M., Mazzola, C., Esposito, G., Matias, I., Petrosino, S., De Filippis, D., et al. (2006). Endocannabinoids and beta-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in vivo: effect of pharmacological elevation of endocannabinoid levels. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 1410–1424.
  45. Haghani, M., Shabani, M., Javan, M., Motamedi, F., and Janahmadi, M. (2012). CB1 cannabinoid receptor activation rescues amyloid β-induced alterations in behaviour and intrinsic electrophysiological properties of rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurones. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 29, 391–406.
  46. Wu, J., Bie, B., Yang, H., Xu, J. J., Brown, D. L., and Naguib, M. (2013). Activation of the CB2 receptor system reverses amyloid-induced memory deficiency. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 791–804.
  47. Martín-Moreno, A. M., Reigada, D., Ramírez, B. G., Mechoulam, R., Innamorato, N., Cuadrado, A., etal. (2011). Cannabidiol and other cannabinoids reduce microglial activation in vitro and in vivo: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Pharmacol. 79, 964–973.
  48. Tolón, R. M., Núñez, E., Pazos, M. R., Benito, C., Castillo, A. I., Martínez-Orgado, J. A., et al. (2009). The activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors stimulates in situ and in vitro beta-amyloid removal by human macrophages. Brain Res. 1283, 148–154.
  49. Martín-Moreno, A. M., Brera, B., Spuch, C., Carro, E., García-García, L., Delgado, M., et al. (2012). Prolonged oral cannabinoid administration prevents neuroinflammation, lowers β-amyloid levels and improves cognitive performance in Tg APP 2576 mice. J. Neuroinflammation 9, 8.
  50. Chen, R., Zhang. J., Fan, N., Teng, Z. Q., Wu, Y., Yang, H., et al. (2013). (9)-THC-caused synaptic and memory impairments are mediated through COX-2 signaling. Cell 155, 1154–1165.
  51. Esposito, G., De Filippis, D., Carnuccio, R., Izzo, A. A., and Iuvone, T. (2006a). The marijuana component cannabidiol inhibits beta-amyloid-induced tau protein hyperphosphorylation through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway rescue in PC12 cells. J. Mol. Med. 84, 253–258.
  52. Esposito, G., De Filippis, D., Steardo, L., Scuderi, C., Savani, C., Cuomo, V., et al. (2006b). CB1 receptor selective activation inhibits beta-amyloid-induced iNOS protein expression in C6 cells and subsequently blunts tau protein hyper- phosphorylation in co-cultured neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 404, 342–346.
  53. Aso, E., Juvés, S., Maldonado, R., and Ferrer, I. (2013). CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist ameliorates Alzheimer-like phenotype in AβPP/PS1 mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 35, 847–858.
  54. Casarejos, M. J., Perucho, J., Gómez, A., Muñoz, M. P., Fernández-Estévez, M., Sagredo, O., et al. (2013). Natural cannabinoids improve dopamine neurotransmission and tau and amyloid pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy. J. Alzheimers Dis. 35, 525–539.  
  55. Ramírez, B. G., Blázquez, C., Gómez del Pulgar, T., Guzmán M., and de Ceballos, M. L. (2005). Prevention of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by cannabinoids: neuroprotection mediated by blockade of microglial activation. J. Neurosci. 25, 1904–1913.
  56. Esposito, G., Iuvone, T., Savani, C., Scuderi, C., De Filippis, D., Papa, M., et al. (2007). Opposing control of cannabinoid receptor stimulation on amyloid-beta- induced reactive gliosis: in vitro and in vivo evidence. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 322, 1144–1152.
  57. Fakhfouri, G., Ahmadiani, A., Rahimian, R., Grolla, A. A., Moradi, F., and Haeri, A. (2012). WIN55212-2 attenuates amyloid-beta-induced neuroinflammation in rats through activation of cannabinoid receptors and PPAR-γ pathway. Neuropharmacology 63, 653–666.
  58. Aso, E., Palomer, E., Juvés, S., Maldonado, R., Muñoz, F. J., and Ferrer, I. (2012). CB1 agonist ACEA protects neurons and reduces the cognitive impairment of AβPP/PS1 mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 30, 439–459.
  59. Piro, J. R., Benjamin, D. I., Duerr, J. M., Pi, Y., Gonzales, C., Wood, K. M., et al. (2012). A dysregulated endocannabinoid-eicosanoid network supports pathogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep. 1, 617–623.  
  60. Benito, C., Tolón, R. M., Castillo, A. I., Ruiz-Valdepeñas, L., Martínez-Orgado, J. A., Fernández-Sánchez, F. J., et al. (2012). β-Amyloid exacerbates inflammation in astrocytes lacking fatty acid amide hydrolase through a mechanism involving PPAR-α, PPAR-γ and TRPV1, but not CB1 or CB2 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 166, 1474–1489.
  61. Hampson, A. J., Grimaldi, M., Axelrod, J., and Wink, D. (1998). Cannabidiol and (−) D9-tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 8268–8273.
  62. Hampson, A. J., Grimaldi, M., Lolic, M., Wink, D., Rosenthal, R., and Axelrod, J. (2000). Neuroprotective antioxidants from marijuana. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 899, 274–282.
  63. Esposito, G., Scuderi, C., Valenza, M., Togna, G. I., Latina, V., De Filippis, D., et al. (2011). Cannabidiol reduces Aβ-induced neuroinflammation and promotes hippocampal neurogenesis through PPARγ involvement. PLoS ONE 6:e28668.
  64. Athanasiou, A., Clarke, A. B., Turner, A. E., Kumaran, N. M., Vakilpour, S., Smith, P. A., et al. (2007). Cannabinoid receptor agonists are mitochondrial inhibitors: a unified hypothesis of how cannabinoids modulate mitochondrial function and induce cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 364, 131–137.
  65. Feigenbaum, J. J., Bergmann, F., Richmond, S. A., Mechoulam, R., Nadler, V., Kloog, Y., et al. (1989). Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid acts as a functional N-methyl- D-aspartate receptor blocker. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9584–9587.
  66. Eshhar, N., Striem, S., and Biegon, A. (1993). HU-211, a non-psychotropic cannabinoid, rescues cortical neurones from excitatory amino acid toxicity in culture. Neuroreport 5, 237–240.
  67. Nadler, V., Mechoulam, R., and Sokolovsky, M. (1993). The non- psychotropic cannabinoid (+)-(3S,4S)-7-hydroxy-delta 6-tetrahydrocannabinol 1,1-dimethylheptyl (HU-211) attenuates N -methyl-D-aspartate receptor- mediated neurotoxicity in primary cultures of rat forebrain. Neurosci. Lett. 162, 43–45.
  68. Eubanks, L. M., Rogers, C. J., Beuscher, A. E. IV, Koob, G. F., Olson, A. J., Dickerson, T. J., et al. (2006). A molecular link between the active component of marijuana and Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Mol. Pharm. 3, 773–777.
  69. Noonan, J., Tanveer, R., Klompas, A., Gowran, A., McKiernan, J., and Camp- bell, V. A. (2010). Endocannabinoids prevent β-amyloid-mediated lysosomal destabilization in cultured neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 38543–38554.
  70. Tanveer, R., Gowran, A., Noonan, J., Keating, S. E., Bowie, A. G., and Camp- bell, V. A. (2012). The endocannabinoid, anandamide, augments Notch-1 signaling in cultured cortical neurons exposed to amyloid-β and in the cortex of aged rats. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 34709–34721.
  71. Khaspekov, L. G., Brenz-Verca, M. S., Frumkina, L. E., Hermann, H., Marsicano, G., and Lutz, B. (2004). Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in cannabinoid receptor-dependent protection against excitotoxicity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1691–1698.
  72. Casarejos, M. J., Perucho, J., Gómez, A., Muñoz, M. P., Fernández-Estévez, M., Sagredo, O., et al. (2013). Natural cannabinoids improve dopamine neuro- transmission and tau and amyloid pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy. J. Alzheimers Dis. 35, 525–539.
  73. Wagner, J. A., Járai, Z., Bátkai, S., and Kunos, G. (2001). Hemodynamic effects of cannabinoids: coronary and cerebral vasodilation mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 423, 203–210.
  74. Iring, A., Ruisánchez, É., Leszl-Ishiguro, M., Horváth, B., Benkõ, R., Lacza, Z., et al. (2013). Role of endocannabinoids and cannabinoid-1 receptors in cerebrocortical blood flow regulation. PLoS ONE 8:e53390.
  75. Baswan, S.M.; Klosner, A.E.; Glynn, K.; Rajgopal, A.; Malik, K.; Yim, S.; Stern, N. Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol (CBD) for Skin Health and Disorders. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2020, 13, 927–942.
  76. Passmore, M.J. The cannabinoid receptor agonist nabilone for the treatment of dementia-related agitation. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2008, 23, 116–117.
  77. Cohen, L.M.; Ash, E.; Outen, J.D.; Vandrey, R.; Amjad, H.; Agronin, M.; Burhanullah, M.H.; Walsh, P.; Wilkins, J.M.; Leoutsakos, J.M.; et al. Study rationale and baseline data for pilot trial of dronabinol adjunctive treatment of agitation in Alzheimer’s dementia (THC-AD). Int. Psychogeriatr. 2021, 1–6.
  78. Volicer, L.; Stelly, M.; Morris, J.; McLaughlin, J.; Volicer, B.J. Effects of dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 1997, 12, 913–919.  
  79. Liu, C. S., Chau, S. A., Ruthirakuhan, M., Lanctôt, K. L., & Herrmann, N. (2015). Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Drugs, 29(8), 615–623.
  80. Ruthirakuhan, M., Lanctôt, K. L., Vieira, D., & Herrmann, N. (2019). Natural and Synthetic Cannabinoids for Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 80(2), 18r12617.
  81. Giacoppo, S., Mandolino, G., Galuppo, M., Bramanti, P., & Mazzon, E. (2014). Cannabinoids:new promising agents in the treatment of neurological diseases. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 19(11), 18781–18816.
  82. Karl, T., Garner, B., & Cheng, D. (2017). The therapeutic potential of the phytocannabinoid cannabidiol for Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioural Pharmacology, 28, 142–160.
  83. Uddin, M. S., Mamun, A. A., Sumsuzzman, D. M., Ashraf, G. M., Perveen, A., Bungau, S. G., Mousa, S. A., El-Seedi, H. R., Bin-Jumah, M. N., & Abdel-Daim, M. M. (2020). EmergingPromise of Cannabinoids for the Management of Pain and Associated NeuropathologicalAlterations in Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in pharmacology, 11, 1097.
  84. Walther S, Schüpbach B, Seifritz E, Homan P, Strik W (2011). Randomized, controlled crossover trial of dronabinol, 2.5 mg, for agitation in 2 patients with dementia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 31:256–258.