info@aditum.org    +1(205)-633 44 24

Endovascular Treatment of Visceral and Iliac Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms: Management and Outcome Analysis in A Tertiary Referral Center Over one Decade

Authors

Stefano Bacchetti1*, Federico Picone2, Vittorio Cherchi1, Alessandro Vit2, Davide Muschitiello1, Irene Iob1, Giovanni Terrosu1 & Massimo Sponza2
1Clinic of General Surgery, Department of Medicine (DMED), University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

2Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Article Information

*Corresponding author: Stefano Bacchetti, Clinic of General Surgery, Department of Medicine (DMED)

University of Udine – 33100 Udine, Italy, P. le S. Maria Misericordia, 15 – University Hospital, 33100 Udine - Italy.

Received: January 05, 2026             |        Accepted: January 12, 2026           |          Published: February 03, 2026

Citation: Bacchetti S, Picone F, Cherchi V, Vit A,e Muschitiello D, Iob I, Terrosu G& Sponza M., (2026) “Endovascular Treatment of Visceral and Iliac Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms: Management and Outcome Analysis in A Tertiary Referral Center Over one Decade.” International Journal of Interventional Radiology and Imaging, 4(1); DOI: 10.61148/3065-6702/IJIRI/048.

Copyright:  © 2026 Stefano Bacchetti. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the radiological and clinical outcomes of patients with aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of visceral and iliac arteries submitted to endovascular treatment.

Patients and Methods: We evaluated the electronic medical records of patients with aneurysms submitted to endovascular radiological procedure. These cases were analysed in relation to location and diameter of the vascular lesion, the clinical symptomatology, the type of the interventional procedure and the postoperative complications. A systematic review of the studies in literature was performed using medical databases PubMed and Medline.

Results: In our study, we examined 117 true aneurysms and 39 pseudoaneurysms in the visceral and iliac arteries of 151 patients. All cases were treated using the percutaneous procedure, with technical success achieved in 95% of patients and organ preservation in 84.2% of cases. Following a review of the literature, we included 56 studies reporting data on 3,299 patients and 3,439 aneurysms. Of these, 79.2% were treated with an interventional radiological approach, achieving a technical success rate of 94.2%.

Conclusions: In our experience, endovascular treatment of visceral and iliac aneurysms is feasible and safe, as this procedure has a high success rate, low operative risk and reduced morbidity.

Keywords:

aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, visceral artery, iliac artery, endovascular treatment, literature review

Introduction:

Visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and pseudoaneurysms, also named false aneurysms, (VAPAs) are usually asymptomatic, but they can be life-threatening due to the increased risk of rupture and haemorrhage (1-3). With improved imaging techniques, the diagnosis of these lesions has increased (4,5). Furthermore, the diffusion of minimally invasive and interventional radiological procedures for their treatment has been reported (4,6). In clinical studies, these aneurysms have a low incidence of 0.01-0.2%, and the majority are detected by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1,2,7,8). However, they have a high mortality rate (3,5). In abdomen, the vassels commonly affected include splenic, hepatic, mesenteric, renal, iliac and celiac arteries (6,7,9). Nevertheless, consensus regarding optimal management remains limited (1,2,4,5). The risk of rupture of these aneurysms is increased during pregnancy and in patients with portal hypertension and liver transplantation (2,3,5). About 25% of the VAAs are in the rupture phase, with a mortality rate of 25-100% (2,5). Although there are no randomized trials focusing on the treatment of these arterial lesions, various therapeutical principles are described in international guidelines (6,7).

1. Materials and methods

1.1 Patients (present serie)

We have analysed electronic medical records of patients with arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of visceral and iliac vassels that were submitted to treatment from January 2013 to December 2024. For each patient, radiological and clinical data were collected regarding age, gender, location, morphology and size of the lesions, presenting symptoms and signs, diagnostic modalities, the type of endovascular treatment, complications and short-term and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study was conducted at our hospital in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Institutional Review Board of the Department of Medicine (IRB-DMed). All patients signed consent for the interventional procedure and for the evaluation of their clinical data. The indications for endovascular therapy were based on the guidelines established by the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (6). In many cases the detection of VAAs occurred as incidental diagnosis in the asymptomatic phase. The definition of unfavorable vascular anatomy considered the morphology of the neck of the lesions, the availability of landing zones for stenting, the degree of tortuosity of the vessel and the risk of ischemia of the target organ. In all cases, percutaneous endovascular access was obtained with the Seldinger technique, mainly with femoral artery access. For selective catheterization of the vessel, 5-7F introducers and 4-7F catheters were most frequently used. In many cases, flow-diverter stents and covered stents (“stent-grafts”) were used. Materials commonly used for embolization treatment were coils (metal coils, controlled detachment coils, microcoils and POD coils), vascular plugs (Amplatzer type), glues (Glubran, Lipiodol and Spongostan type) and liquid embolizing agents. In many patients, the combined use of these techniques was necessary. 

The definition of technical success can be categorized according to the percutaneous technique applied:

• in the case of stent placement, technical success is determined by the effective and stable exclusion of the aneurysmal sac, without residual flow to it

• in the case of embolization techniques, technical success is determined by the complete interruption of blood flow to the aneurysmal sac

• in the case of flow diversion stent, technical success also depends on the correct positioning of the endoprosthesis in the site defined in the preoperative phase.

Complications associated with endovascular treatment were classified according to the criteria established by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR criteria). The most frequent complications were cardiovascular and cerebrovascular infarction, hemorrhage, abscesses, inflammatory/infectious complication at site of arterial puncture. The outcomes of interest in the follow-up phase are aneurysm-related mortality, the rate and type of long-term aneurysm-related complications and the rate of late re-intervention.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained from the analysis were summarized in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 for Windows statistical software. Continuous variables are expressed in terms of mean ± SD and were analyzed using the Student t-test for independent samples and discrete variables are expressed in terms of frequency and/or percentage. Differences between groups are considered significant for P-values ​​less than 0.05. The Kaplan-Meier method was not applied for survival analysis as it was not possible to have extended data regarding the mortality/survival of the patients included in this study.

1. 2. Literature review
 1.2.1  Study design

For the literature review, PubMed and MEDLINE databases were used. Studies published from January 2013 to September 2024 were considered, with no language restrictions and using terms such as "visceral artery aneurysm", "visceral aneurysm", "renal artery aneurysm", "hypogastric artery aneurysm", "internal iliac artery aneurysm", "isolated iliac artery aneurysm", "endovascular" combined with the boolean operators AND and OR alternatively.

1.2.2 Inclusion criteria

The following criteria were used to include the studies in the analysis:

• studies referring to the use of endovascular treatment for aneurysms of the visceral arteries, renal arteries, and/or iliac/hypogastric arteries

• studies referring to the use of endovascular treatment for pseudoaneurysms of the visceral, renal, and hypogastric arteries

• studies published between January 2013 and September 2024 in English, German and Spanish

• studies that include a number of patients greater than or equal to 4

• studies that include information regarding the characteristics of treated patients, the type of treatment and patient outcome

• case series and studies including both radiological and surgical treatment for the management of aneurysmal lesions.

1.2.3 Exclusion criteria

The following criteria were used to exclude the studies in the analysis:

• studies that did not refer to endovascular techniques for the treatment of visceral, renal artery or hypogastric artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms

• studies published before January 2013

• studies with an inadequate number of patients treated with a radiological technique

•studies with insufficient information of interest regarding patient characteristics, type of treatment and outcome

• studies involving fewer than 4 patients.

1.2.4 Selection of the studies and data extraction

An initial evaluation of the studies was performed both through abstracts and full text. The references cited in these studies were then recorded to find other publications on the same topic. From the selected studies, we obtain radiological and clinical data related to the total number of patients, the number of aneurysms, the type, the size, the location, the type of presentation, the endovascular treatment and the follow-up modalities. The informations obtained from the studies was scheduled in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics 22 for Windows.

2. Results

2.1. Present serie 

In our serie, 151 patients with 156 aneurysms of visceral and iliac arteries were submitted to endovascular radiological therapy. In these patients, there were 117 true aneurysms, and 39 false aneurysms and, of these, 48.2% and 36.8 % of subjects are female, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 66±12.3 years (range 26-87). The mean age was 66.2±12.6 years (range 26-87) in the group of patients affected by true aneurysms and 66.8±11.5 years (range 30-83) in patients with pseudoaneurysms. The mean diameter of the lesions was 28.1±16.8 mm, with differences related to the site of presentation. In the cohort of patients with true aneurysms, a mean diameter of the lesions was 30.4±16.6 mm; however, in patients with false aneurysm the mean diameter of the lesions was 21.8±16.1 mm. The mean size of the aneurisms in the splenic artery was 29.6±13.1 mm; however, the size was 25.1±26.8 mm in hepatic artery and 23.9±12.9 mm in renal artery. As shown in table 4, we observe that, in 46.2% of patients, the most frequent localization is the splenic artery.

Table 4.  Patients and true/ false aneurysm (our serie)

Table 4.  Patients and true/ false aneurysm (our serie)

Data

TOTAL

TOT. (%)

TRUE

TRUE (%)

FALSE

FALSE (%)

p

Patients

151

 

112

75,5%

39

24,5%

 

Aneurysm

156

 

117

75,7%

39

24,3%

 

Gender (F)

68

45%

54

48,2%

14

35,9%

 

Mean age (years)

66±12,3

 

66,2±12,6

 

66,8±11,5

 

0,4

Site

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Splenic

72

46,2%

70

59,8%

2

5,1%

<0,001

Hepatic

18

11,5%

7

6,0%

11

28,2%

<0,001

Renal

21

13,5%

12

10,3%

9

23,1%

0,02

PDA

12

7,7%

8

6,8%

4

10,3%

0,24

GDA

11

7,1%

3

2,6%

8

20,5%

<0.001

SMA

2

1,3%

2

1,7%

0

0,0%

0,21

Gastric

2

1,3%

0

0,0%

2

2,6%

0,007

IMA

1

0,6%

1

0,9%

0

0,0%

0,3

Iliac

15

9,6%

13

11,1%

2

5,1%

0,14

Other 

2

1,3%

1

0,9%

1

2,6%

0,2

Mean diametre (mm)

28,1±16,8

 

30,4±16,6

 

21,8±16,1

 

0,002

Ruptured phase

16

10,3%

8

6,8%

8

20,5%

0,007

Calcifications

57

36,5%

56

47,9%

1

2,6%

 

Thrombosis

23

14,7%

22

18,8%

1

2,6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PDA: pancreaticoduodenal artery; GDA: gastroduodenal artery; SMA: superior mesenteric artery; IMA: inferior mesenteric artery.

The incidence of hepatic and renal artery pseudoaneurysms was 28.2% and 23.1%, respectively. In cases with true aneurysms, it was observed that 87.3% of the lesions presented a saccular morphology, while 12.7% presented a fusiform morphology. In our patients, 18.8% of the cases had intrasaccular thrombosis, while the calcifications of the aneurysmal sac were demonstrated in 47.9%. The diagnosis of aneurysm was made in the asymptomatic phase in 68.2% of cases. In the asymptomatic phase, true aneurysms had an incidence of 84.8%, instead pseudoaneurysms 20.5% only. In patients with true aneurysm, the symptom most frequently found is abdominal pain in 8% of cases and active bleeding in 1.8%. Instead, in patients with false aneurysms, the most frequent symptoms were anemia in 30.8% of cases and active bleeding in 12.8%. In our study, sixteen patients were treated in the rupture phase. In figure 1 we reported a preoperative CT angiography of a hepatic artery aneurysm showing rupture of the aneurysmal sac.

Figure 1: Preoperative CT angiography of a hepatic artery aneurysm showing rupture of the aneurysmal sac.

From a clinical point of view, the rupture phase of true aneurysm had asymptomatic behavior in two cases, an active bleeding in two patients and a severe abdominal pain in four. In the rupture phase, patients with pseudoaneurysm had anemia in four cases, an active bleeding in two, abdominal pain in one and hemorrhagic shock in one case. In these patients, the most frequent concomitant clinical or pathological condition was previous abdominal surgery in 11.9% of cases, neoplastic disease in 7.9% and pancreatitis in 4.6%. In our patients, all procedures were performed under local or loco-regional anesthesia. The vascular access was at the level of the femoral artery or at the humeral artery and the most used technique is the sandwich with coils in 24.4% of the patients. The treatment with coils was used in the “coil packing technique” in 16.7% of cases. Different endovascular techniques were used in the two groups of patients with true and false aneurysms. The “sandwich” embolization was used in 21.4% of cases with true aneurysm and 33.3% of patients with pseudoaneurysm. Patients treated for true aneurysms (21.4%) showed a higher frequency of coiling techniques compared to the group treated for pseudoaneurysms (2,6%). However, there was a higher number of cases treated with stent-grafting techniques for pseudoaneurysm (20.5% false vs 5.1% true aneurysm) and glue embolization (21% false vs 3.4% true aneurysms). The most used materials were the coils in 66% of patients and the stent-grafts in 28.8% of cases. For the treatment of pseudoaneurysm, glues were used in 33.3%. In patients with false aneurysm, exclusion of the aneurysmal sac and vascular resolution was obtained in all cases. In these patients, a complication rate of 5.1% was documented. In the group of patients treated for true aneurysm, the technical success rate was 93.2%, but in seven patients the percutaneous treatment did not allow complete and stable exclusion of the aneurysmal sac. The early re-intervention rate for these patients was 0.85%. According to SIR classification, patients with true aneurysm had a complications rate of 17.9%. The most frequent complication has been splenic infarction in 9.6% of cases. In figure 2, the segmental ischemia of the spleen in postoperative CT angiography of the splenic artery aneurysm is documented. Overall, the technical success rate was 95%, with the early reintervention rate of 0.6% and the complication rate of 12.8%.

Figure 2: Segmental ischemia of the spleen in postoperative CT angiography of a splenic artery aneurysm.

In our patients no perioperative death was observed, and long-term follow-up is available in 105 patients with true and 28 patients with pseudoaneurysm. In these patients, the cumulative mean duration of follow-up is 34.8±17.4 months. During follow-up, the most used diagnostic technique has been angio-CT with contrast medium or CT angiogram in 77.4% of patients; instead, MRI or MR angiogram were performed in 5.3% and ultrasound in 3.8% of cases, respectively. The most frequent complication has been segmental splenic infarction (8.6%), reperfusion of the native lesion (6.7%) and stenosis of the stent-graft (1.9%). Among the patients with splenic infarction, one case required a surgical procedure with splenectomy, while another case showed an abscess that required radiological drainage. The rate of late re-intervention (more than one month after primary endovascular intervention) has been 1.7%. In two cases, it was necessary to have a second session of endovascular therapy due to a reperfusion of the native lesion.

Literature review

The initial literature search produced 5052 papers, and, after selection, 1326 publications were retained. Then, these publications were analyzed for the abstract, obtaining 70 articles with relevant content. After the analysis of the full text of these 70 papers, a further 14 articles were excluded from the review as they did not include an adequate number of patients or did not provide sufficient informations. Finally, we included 56 studies with 3299 cases, and, among these patients, 3439 aneurysms were identified.  In figure 4 we report the PRISMA flow diagram of selection.

                    

Figure 4: PRISMA flow diagram of selection of the studies in literature

All studies are retrospective and were published between January 2013 to September 2024. These papers described patients treated during the period 1985-2023. In table 1 the main characteristics of the selected studies are reported.

Table 1. Studies (literature review)

Author

           Study

Year

Total N.  aneurysm

Aneurysm with procedure

 

 Endovasc.

treatment

Type

Vaquero et al.62

Retrosp

2013

13

10

78,0%

Coiling, stent

Iryo et al.63

Retrosp

2013

15

15

100,0%

Coiling

Koganemaru et al.64

Retrosp

2013

23

23

100,0%

Coil packing

Yasumoto et al.65

Retrosp

2013

46

46

100,0%

Coli packing

Künzle et al.66

Retrosp

2013

19

19

100,0%

Stent-graft o stent-graft with coiling

Balderi et al.67

Case series

2013

5

5

100,0%

Stent multilayer

Mazzaccaro et al.51

Retrosp

2013

32

32

59,0%

Stent , coiling, thrombin, plug 

Maruno et al.68

Retrosp

2013

8

8

100,0%

Coil packing

Muradi et al.69

Retrosp

2013

35

35

100,0%

Stent-graft, coiling o NBCA

Shukla et al.58

Retrosp

2014

181

181

67,4%

Coiling, stenting

Scholtz et al.70

Retrosp

2015

22

19

54,5%

Coiling, stent

Duan et al.71

Retrosp

2015

52

52

100,0%

Coiling, alcool polyvinil

Dorigo et al.72

Retrosp

2015

26

26

100,0%

Coiling, stent, stent multilayer

Madhusudhan et al.73

Retrosp

2015

31

31

100,0%

 NBCA e spirals

Pitton et al.4

Retrosp

2015

253

59

76,3%

Coiling, glue

Pfister et al.74

Retrosp

2016

168

60

52,0%

Coiling con Onyx; coiling with stent; stentgraft

Guo et al.59

Retrosp

2016

162

134

84,3%

Coiling, stent

Regus et al.75

Retrosp

2016

31

31

48,0%

Coiling

Batagini et al.56

Retrosp

2016

296

113

50,4%

Coiling, stent

Yadav et al.76

Retrosp Cross-sectional

2016

11

11

100,0%

NBCA e thrombin

Regus et al.77

Retrosp

2016

33

32

50,0%

Coiling

Kok et al.24

Retrosp

2016

19

19

100,0%

Coiling, NBCA, thrombin, stent flow diversion

Song et al.50

Retrosp comparative

2017

93

93

64,0%

Coiling, stent

Venturini et al.61

Retrosp

2017

40

40

100,0%

Stent-graft, coiling o NBCA

Marra et al.78

Retrosp

2017

100

100

100,0%

Coiling, stent-graft

Cappucci et al.79

Retrosp multicentric

2017

25

25

100,0%

Coiling, stent

Erben et al.80

Retrosp

2017

138

30

67,0%

Coiling

Massoni et al.81

Retrosp multicentric

2017

32

32

100,0%

Endograft,  plug, stent

Martinelli et al.82

Retrosp

2017

131

131

45,8%

Coiling, stent

Ruhnke et al.83

Retrosp

2017

43

43

100,0%

Coiling, stent-graft, liquid agents

Pirvu et al.84

Retrosp

2017

20

20

100,0%

Coiling o plug, stent-graft

Pfister et al.85

Retrosp comparative

    2018

179

69

51,0%

Coiling, Onyx; stent-graft;

Gao et al.86

Retrosp

2018

22

22

100,0%

Coiling, stent-graft

Kobe et al.87

Retrosp

2018

85

85

100,0%

Coiling o plug, stent-graft, stent aortoiliac

Kliewer et al.88

Retrosp

2019

55

55

100,0%

Iliac branch devices, stent-graft, coiling, plug, stent

Pyra et al.89

Retrosp

2019

60

57

100,0%

Coiling, stent, thrombin, coiling with ballon, coiling with stent, coiling and thrombin

Shibata et al.90

Retrosp

2020

4

4

100,0%

Coiling, NBCA

Van Veenendaal et al.54

Case series

2020

6

6

100,0%

Stent

Berek et al.91

Retrosp comparative

2020

14

14

35,7%

Coiling, stent

Keschenau et al.92

Retrosp

2020

37

24

16,0%

Coiling, stent

Kim et al.93

Retrosp

2020

32

32

100,0%

Stent-graft, Coiling o plug

Rabuffi et al.94

Retrosp

2020

6

6

100,0%

Flow-diverter stent

Yang et al.49

Retrosp multicentric

2020

42

42

85,7%

Stent-graft, coiling

Pitcher et al.95

Retrosp

2021

144

46

18,0%

Coiling, stent

Stark et al.96

Retrosp

2021

43

21

26,0%

Coiling, glue

Tipaldi et al.97

Retrosp

2021

11

11

100,0%

Coiling, stent, glue, Onyx, plug

Ren et al.60

Retrosp

2021

159

159

96,8%

Coiling, coils+stent, stent

Wolk et al.98

Retrosp

2021

60

60

38,3%

Coiling, stent-graft

Vani et al.99

 Case series

2021

8

8

50,0%

Coiling, stent-graft

Dezfouli et al.48

Retrosp

2021

12

12

36,4%

Coiling

Shimohira et al.100

Retrosp

2021

47

47

100,0%

Coiling, NBCA, gelatin sponge

Borghese et al.101

Retrosp

2021

58

58

100,0%

Embolization with NBCA

Gong et al.102

Retrosp

2023

103

66

100,0%

Coiling

Minici et al.103

Retrosp multicentric

2023

38

38

100,0%

Embolization with liquid agents

Xiao et al.104

Retrosp

2023

39

31

100,0%

Coiling, stent-graft, plug

Fargion et al.105

Retrosp

2023

72

72

100,0%

Coiling, stent, stent with flow diversion

             

TOT (N°)

   

3439

       2520

   

TOT (%)

     

 73,28%

79,2%

 

NBCA: N-butyl cyanoacrylate

  1. 2.2 Patients data (literature)

In the fifty-six papers considered, the patients had a mean age of 60.5±8.6 years (range: 15-97 years). The number of patients included in these studies varies between 4 and 296, but only nineteen studies include more than fifty patients. The distribution male/female (M/F) shows a higher incidence in men, and the M/F was 63.8%/36.2%. It is important to underline that data regarding comorbidities is available only in 37/56 studies. As shown in table 2, the most common comorbidities were hypertension and dyslipidemia.

 

 

 

Table 2. Patients and aneurysms (literature review)

 

 

  %

   % tot.

Patients

3299

 

 

Total n. of aneurysms

3439

 

 

Mean age (years)

60,5±8,6

 

 

Gender (F)

1193

36,2%

 

Comorbidity

2526

 

 

     Hypertension

835

33,1%

25,3%

     Diabetes

110

4,4%

3.3%

     Smoke

316

12,5%

9,6%

     Dyslipidemia

232

9,2%

7,0%

     Obesity

29

1,2%

0,9%

     IBD

8

0,3%

0,2%

     Heath failure

8

0,3%

0,2%

     Chronic liver pathology

76

3,0%

2,3%

     Portal hypertension

15

0,6%

0,5%

     Renal failure

68

2,7%

2,1%

     Chronic pancreatitis

22

0,9%

0,7%

Etiology

1470

 

 

     Atherosclerosis

534

36,3%

16,2%

     Traumatic lesion

82

5,6%

2,5%

     Acute pancreatitis

159

10,8%

4,8%

     Iatrogenic procedures

149

10,1%

4,5%

     Arcuate ligament syndrom

37

2,5%

1,1%

     Connective tissue disorders

 

 

 

        S. of Ehlers-Danlos

12

0,8%

0,4%

        α1-antitrypsin deficiency

2

0,1%

0,1%

        Fibromuscolar dysplasia

30

2,0%

0,9%

        Other

27

1,8%

0,8%

     Vasculitis

 

 

 

          Nodosal polyarteritis

3

0,5%

0,1%

          Other

18

1,2%

0,5%

IBD: inflammatory bowel disease

Other data regarding the etiology of aneurysmal lesions, however, can be found in only 21/56 papers. From a clinical point of view, among all the patients considered, 25.4% presented symptoms. The most frequent symptomatology has been abdominal pain in 48.7% of patients, bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract in 21% and nausea/vomiting in 6.2%. In 46/56 articles it was possible to find information on the rupture phase of the aneurysms. In these studies, 15.1% of the aneurysms were identified and managed in the rupture phase. The most frequent clinical condition associated with ruptured phase has been severe acute abdominal pain, sometimes associated with hypotension and hemodynamic instability (in 30.1% of cases) or hypovolemic shock (in 8.4% of patients). The most used diagnostic technique for the characterization of lesions has been angio-CT as described in thirty-nine studies. From a morphological point of view, of the 3439 aneurysms, there were 2672 (77.7%) true aneurysms and 767 (22.3%) pseudoaneurysms. The mean diameter of the lesions has been 26±13.9 mm (range 5-80 mm). After the cumulative analysis of these studies, the most frequent site of the aneurysms has been the splenic artery, in 33.4% of patients. Other vessels that presented aneurysmatic lesions were the hepatic artery (11.6%), the renal artery (11.6%) and the iliac artery (9.4%).

2.3 Treatment modalities (literature)

The group of patients analyzed in this review were treated with endovascular procedure in 79.2% of cases. Moreover, twenty-three studies considered a comparative surgical cohort, and, in some studies, there was an observational not operative control. Overall, in 73.3% of patients the aneurysms were submitted to therapy, while 26.7% of cases were managed with a not operative approach. In 92,9% of the studies, the radiological treatment was performed with embolization techniques. Other types of percutaneous therapies were the stenting techniques in 66.1% of cases, the remodeling techniques in 19.6% and the percutaneous thrombin injection in 7.1% of patients. In 46 studies, as described in table 3, the most used materials for embolization were coils; however, Amplatzer-type vascular plugs were used in 15 studies and liquid embolic agents (Onyx and N-buty-2-cyanoacrylate) in six and nine studies respectively.

 

Table 3. Endovascular techniques (literature review)

 

N° studies

%

Embolization

52

92,9%

Spiral

46

82,1%

Plug (Amplatzer)

15

26,8%

Liquid agent Onyx

6

10,7%

Liquid agent NBCA

9

16,1%

Glue

3

5,4%

Gelatin sponge

1

1,8%

Stenting

37

66,1%

Stent graft

34

60,7%

Stent diversion

5

8,9%

Stent aortic-iliac

3

5,4%

Thrombin injection

4

7,1%

 

Remodelling procedures

11

19,6%

Baloon-assisted coiling

2

3,6%

Stent-assisted coiling

9

16,1%

NBCA: N-butyl cyanoacrylate

Most papers reported a combined use of embolization and stenting techniques. However, in the study of Yasumoto et al. the treatment with coils was applied only for the coil-packing technique (65). In other series, Künzle et al. and Rabuffi et al. described the use of flow-diversion stents exclusively (66,94). In another study, Maruno et al. reported the treatment of aneurysms only with the controlled-release coils (68).

2.4 Outcomes and complications (literature)

After the analysis of the studies in literature, we documented that technical successful rate has been obtained in 94.2% of patients, with a target organ preservation rate of 99.4%. The early radiological re-treatment rate was 5,9% (range 0-38%) as reported in 53/56 studies. In 26.9% of patients, the most frequent cause of re-intervention has been the incomplete exclusion of the aneurysm. Other causes of re-treatment were the reperfusion of the aneurysmatic lesion in 23.9% of cases, the re-bleeding in 19.4% and the endoleak in 14.9%. Overall, 235 patients had complications related to endovascular procedure, and so, the complication rate was 14%. In 42.1% of cases, partial ischemia of the target organ was the most frequent complication. After percutaneous treatment, the data of postoperative mortality has been reported in 54/56 studies, and the overall 30-day mortality has been 1.9%.

In all the studies included in our review, the duration and modalities of follow-up are available, while data on the re-treatment rate is available on 26/56 papers. The mean duration of follow-up was 27.6±16.4 months and the most used techniques for evaluation were angio-CT and ultrasound with contrast medium or eco-color-doppler. Other types of follow-ups with radiological imaging were angio-MR in 30.4% and angiography in 4.3% of patients. During radiological follow-up the most frequent findings were the endoleaks in 27.5% of cases. Furthermore, the ischemia of the target organ was demonstrated in eight patients. The cumulative analysis of all the studies demonstrated that the re-intervention rate has been 4.9%. The most frequent cause of re-treatment was a significant increase of the native aneurysmal sac due to endoleak in 27.5% of patients.

Discussion

Over the past few decades, there has been a significant increase in the use of diagnostic imaging techniques (10,11). Furthermore, percutaneous radiological treatment has recently become a well-established technique for managing visceral and iliac artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms (9, 12–26). After the analysis of the recent papers in literature, we observed that most studies were retrospective and often included only a small number of patients. Indeed, the largest series were reported in the studies of Pitton et al. and Batagini et al., which evaluated 233 and 296 patients, respectively (4,56).  It is important to note that VAAs often present with non-specific or absent symptoms, and some researchers have suggested that a significant proportion of the general population may have undiagnosed visceral aneurysmatic lesions (27–31). As reported in other studies and in our experience, VAAs are often incidental diagnostic findings, detected during radiological examinations performed for different reasons (32–42). In our group, 68.2% of patients have an incidental diagnosis of aneurysm, therefore in the asymptomatic phase. In literature the ruptured phase of patients with aneurysms is described in 14.6-26.6% of cases (4,5,30,47). When clinically symptomatic, VAAs have relevant implications for decision-making and therapeutical strategy. The medical and radiological guidelines identify the symptomatic phase as a major indication for interventional treatment (6,7,28), because, often, true and false aneurysms exhibit symptoms during the rupture phase (4,21,24,77). In our study, sixteen patients were submitted to endovascular treatment in the rupture phase. Compared to lesions treated during an elective procedure, the emergency treatment of ruptured aneurysms has a mortality rate of over 30% and a high morbidity rate. (31,49,59,60,87). Furthermore, the management of lesions in the rupture phase requires longer hospitalization, especially during recovery in intensive care units (35,43,51,58,77). Endovascular treatment is indicated for ruptured VAAs, especially when the aneurysm is in a poorly accessible location for surgical treatment or when operative risks are high because of poor general status. The treatment of ruptured VAA in an unstable patient should always be surgical, but when patients are hemodynamically stable, arteriography can be useful to confirm diagnosis, determine the exact location of the aneurysm and assess the possibility of endovascular treatment. In the present study, two patients with aneurysms in the rupture phase presented a hypovolemic shock. Moreover, the remaining cases have symptoms like active bleeding (25%), anemia (25%) and abdominal pain (25%). While the indication for treating symptomatic and ruptured lesions is relatively straightforward, defining the optimal management strategy for asymptomatic aneurysms remains challenging (57,69,91,92,104,105).  The natural history of visceral aneurysms is poorly understood due to the rarity of these lesions. According to the most recent guidelines, there is an indication for interventional therapy of aneurysmal lesions with a diameter greater than 20 mm, or that double the diameter of the native vessel and in aneurysms that demonstrate rapid annual growth (6,7,10,27,70,86). In patients with VAA, open surgical repair has been considered for years the treatment of choice (2,5). However, the evolution of interventional techniques has led to a shift toward less invasive endovascular procedures, which are now the preferred therapeutical option (2,4,13,27, 87,88). The review of the literature showed that endovascular therapy was performed in 79.2% of cases, with a technical successful rate of 94.2% and a 30-day re-intervention rate of 5.9%. It should be noted that these data come from retrospective studies, as no prospective randomized trials comparing radiological and surgical approaches are currently available. In our cohort, percutaneous treatment was performed by embolization, stenting, and remodelling techniques. In many cases, a combination of materials and techniques was used, as described in other studies (78,94,103). Overall, a technical successful rate of 95% was achieved, reaching 100% in the group of patients treated for false aneurysm. Technical failures were due, in one case to permanence of the inflow to the aneurysmal sac requiring reintervention, in five cases to evidence of reperfusion of the aneurysmal sac, which requires late reintervention in two cases, and in one case to intra-procedural rupture of the aneurysmal sac. While only minor complications according to the SIR classification criteria have been described in our group, a wide range of both major and minor complications can be identified among the studies in literature (106). In figure 3 it is reported an ischemia of the VI liver segment in post-operative CT angiography of a hepatic artery aneurysm.

Figure 3: Ischemia of the VI liver segment in post-operative CT angiography of a hepatic artery aneurysm.

In our analysis of the literature, we include eight studies that evaluate endovascular and surgical outcomes [48–51,56,59,75,98]. Currently, most VAAs are treated endovascularly with favorable results. However, some clinicians sustain that surgical intervention offers long-term durability and may be preferred in complex cases or when organ preservation is not achievable endovascularly (5,27,85,91). Minimally invasive techniques offer significant procedural benefits but are associated with higher reintervention rates, warranting long-term follow-up. In our series, the cumulative reintervention rate was 2.5%, while in the studies in literature it was 6.7%. In cases of inadequate perfusion of the target organs, surgical procedures such as colectomy, splenectomy, nephrectomy or hepatectomy may be required (2,27). In particular, the surgeon's role remains fundamental for the haemorrhage control and the vascular reconstruction not achievable with radiological treatments (6,10).

Conclusions

Based on our experience and analysis of the data in the literature, we state that visceral and iliac aneurysms are rare but complex vascular conditions that can become life-threatening due to their high rupture and haemorrhage rates. A paradigm shift in the management of these arterial lesions occurred in the early 2000s. Over time, surgical procedures were reduced, and percutaneous treatment became the preferred therapy. This is thanks to innovations in materials and interventional techniques, which make it possible to avoid general anaesthesia, shorten hospital stays significantly, and reduce the incidence of complications related to the procedure. Although no randomized studies are available to define the most appropriate therapy, several retrospective studies support the efficacy and safety of interventional radiological procedures have been published in the literature. In our experience, the radiological approach has the advantage of significantly lower rates of major complications and limited interventional risk, as well as the possibility of using less burdensome anaesthetic regimens, such as local or loco-regional anaesthesia. However, the treatment of abdominal aneurysms should be multidisciplinary, involving interventional radiologists and vascular/general surgeons.

Declarations

Ethical approval This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the Department of Medicine (IRB-DMed).

Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other supports were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Contributors: Massimo Sponza and Federico Picone designed the study and planned the therapeutic approach. Alessandro Vit, Massimo Sponza and Federico Picone were directly involved in patient care, performed the procedures and acquired the clinical data. Stefano Bacchetti drafted the manuscript and prepared the paper. Irene Iob, Stefano Bacchetti, Vittorio Cherchi, Davide Muschitiello, Federico Picone and Giovanni Terrosu contributed to data acquisition, critical revision and editing of the manuscript. Stefano Bacchetti, Massimo Sponza and Giovanni Terrosu critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual and technical content. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Stefano Bacchetti is the guarantor of this work.

References

  1. Pomatto S, Pini R, Faggioli G, Poliseno C, Shyti B, Gargiulo M: A dedicated algorithm for endovascular approach as a first-line treatment option for visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2025; 110:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.115
  2. Hosn MA, Xu J, Sharafuddin M, Corson JD: Visceral artery aneurysms: decision making and treatment options in the new era of minimally invasive and endovascular surgery. Int J Angiol 2019; 28(1):11-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676958.
  3. Holdsworth RJ, Gunn A: Ruptureed splenic artery aneurysm in pregnancy. A review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99:595–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528. 1992. tb13828.x
  4. Pitton MB, Dappa E, Jungmann F, Kloeckner R, Schotten S, et al.: Visceral artery aneurysms: incidence, management, and outcome analysis in a tertiary care center over one decade. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:2004–14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3599-1
  5. Cordova AC, Sumpio BE: Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Should they all be managed by endovascular techniques? Ann Vasc Dis 2013; 6:687–93. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.13-00045
  6. Pratesi C, Esposito D, Martini R, Novali C, Zaninelli A, Annese AL, et al: Guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment and management of visceral and renal arteries aneurysms: a joint assessment by the italian societies of vascular and endovascular surgery (SICVE) and medical and interventional radiology (SIRM). J Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 65(1):49-63.  doi: 10.23736 /s0021-9509.23.12809-6
  7. Chaer RA, Abularrage CJ, Coleman DM, Eslami MH, Kashyap VS, et al: The society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of visceral aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72(1S):3S-39S; doi: 10.1016/ j.jvs.2020.01.039
  8. Cardiovascular diseases statistics. Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa. eu/Eurostat /statisticsexplained/ 2024
  9. Pfammatter T, Kobe A, Lachat ML: Isolated iliac artery aneurysms: interventional treatment. Radiologie 2018; 58:837–40; doi.org /10.1007 / s00117-018-0434-0 
  10. Obara H, Kentaro M, Inoue M, Kitagawa Y: Current management strategies for visceral artery aneurysms: an overview. Surg Today 2020; 50:38–49 doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01898-3
  11. Jesinger RA, Thoreson AA, Lamba R: Abdominal and pelvic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: Imaging review with clinical, radiologic, and treatment correlation. Radiograph 2013; 33(3): E71-96. doi:10.1148/rg. 333115036.
  12. Madhusudhan KS, Venkatesh HA, Gamanagatti S, Garg P, Srivastava DN: Interventional radiology in the management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: A review of techniques and embolic materials. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17:351–63. doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.351
  13. Saad NEA, Saad WEA, Davies MG, Waldman DL, Fultz PJ, Rubens DJ: Pseudoaneurysms and the role of minimally invasive techniques in their management. Radiographics 2005; 25(Suppl 1): S173-89 doi: 10.1148/ rg.25si055503.
  14. Pasha SF, Gloviczki P, Stanson AW, Kamath PS: Splanchnic artery aneurysms. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82:472–79. doi.org/10.4065/82.4.472
  15. Kaufman JA: Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2014, 2nd edition, Elsevier Saunders Ed.
  16. Stougiannou TM, Christodoulou KC, Georgakarakos E, Mikroulis D, Karangelis D: Promising novel therapes in the treatment of aortic and visceral aneurisms. J Clin Med 2023; 12(18):5878, doi 103390/jcm 12185878
  17. Busch A. Grimm C, Hartman E, Paloschi V, Kickuth R, et al.: Vessel wall morphology is equivalent for different artery types and localizations of advanced human aneurysms. Histochem Cell Biol 2017; 148:425–33. doi: 10.1007/s00418-017-1575-3.
  18. Coleman DM, Stanley JC: Renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 779–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.034.
  19. Zhang JC, Ratner M, Harish KB, Speranza G, Austen Hartwell C, et al: Natural history and long-term follow-up of 890 splenic artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77: e350–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.065.
  20. Abbas MA, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, Gloviczki P, Oldenburg WA, et al.: Splenic artery aneurysms: Two decades experience at Mayo Clinic. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16:442–49. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0207-4.
  21. Rossi M, Krokidis M, Kashef E, Peynircioglu B, Tipaldi MA: Standards of practice for the endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47: 26–35. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03620-w
  22. Piasek E, Sojks M, Kuczynska M, Swiatlowski L, Drelich-Zbroja A, et al. Visceral artery aneurysms – classification, diagnosis and treatment. J Ultrason 2018; 18:148–151. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2018.0021.
  23. Mariúba JV: Splenic aneurysms: natural history and treatment techniques. J Vasc Bras 2020; vol.19. doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.190058
  24. Kok HK, Asadi H, Sheehan M, Given MF, Lee MJ: Systematic review and single-center experience for endovascular management of visceral and renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 55:1630–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.07.030.
  25. Altuwaijri TA: Renal artery aneurysms in pregnancy—Management of an uncommon but serious vascular lesion. Semin Vasc Surg 2020; 32:106–10. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2020.03.001.
  26. Sadat U, Dar O, Walsh S, Varty K. Splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy - A systematic review. Internat J Surg 2008; 6:261–65. doi.org/10.1016/j. ijsu. 2007.08.002
  27. Zuhaili B, Black JH: The current management of visceral artery aneurysms. Advan Surg 2021; 55 57–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2021.05.005.
  28. Forbes TL: New society of vascular surgery guidelines provide clarity about treatment of visceral aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72:1-2S doi: 10.1016/ j.jvs.2020.04.485.
  29. Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Montoya SB, Berard  X, Boyle JR, et al. : Editor’s Choice – European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2024, Clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002
  30. Ibrahim F, Dunn J, Rundback J, Pellerito J, Galmer A: Visceral artery aneurysms: diagnosis, surveillance and treatment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2018; 20(12):97. doi.org/10.1007/s11936-018-0696-x
  31. Khairallah MK, Morgan RA, Das R: Technical considerations of endovascular management of true visceral artery aneurysms. CVIR Endovascular 2023; 6(1):31. doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00368-9
  32. Messina LM, Shanley CJ: Visceral artery aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77(2):425-42. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70559-4
  33. Van Rijn MJE, Ten Raa S, Hendriks JM, Verhagen HJM: Visceral aneurysms: old paradigms, new insights? Best Prac Res: Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31: 97–104. doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.017
  34. Madoff DC,  Denys A, Wallace MJ, Murthy R, Gupta S, Pillsbury EP, et al. Splenic arterial interventions: anatomy, indications, technical considerations, and potential complications. Radiographics 2005; 25: Suppl 1: S191-211. doi.org/10.1148/rg.25si055504
  35. Belli AM, Markose G, Morgan R: The role of interventional radiology in the management of abdominal visceral artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35:234–43. doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0201-3
  36. Berceli SA: Hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms. Semin Vasc Surg 2005; 18:196–201. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2005.09.005.
  37. Hemp JH, Sabri SS: Endovascular management of visceral arterial aneurysms. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 18:14–23. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir. 2014.12.003
  38. Lu M, Weiss C, Fishman EK, Johnson PT, Verde F: Review of visceral aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015; 39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/ RCT.0000000000000156.
  39. Tokuda S, Sakuraba S, Orita H, Sakurada M , Kushida T, Maekawa H, Sato K: Aneurysms of pancreaticoduodenal artery due to median arcuate ligament syndrome, treated by open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Case Rep Surg 2019; 13:2019:1795653. doi: 10.1155/2019/1795653.
  40. Ghosh S, Kanti Dutta S: Endovascular interventions in management of renal artery aneurysm. Br J Radiol 2021; 94(1124):20201151. doi: 10.1259/bjr. 20201151.
  41. Peterson LA, Corriere MA: Treatment of renal artery aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 56(4):559-65.  Epub 2015 Mar 10.
  42. González J, Esteban M, Andrés G, Linares E,  Martínez-Salamanca JI: Renal artery aneurysms. Curr Urol Rep 2014; 15(1):376. doi: 10.1007/ s11934-013-0376-z
  43. Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Ulug P, Blankensteijn JD, Lederle FA, Becquemin JP, Greenhalgh RM: Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. BR J Surg 2017; 104(3):166-178 doi: 10.1002/bjs.10430
  44. Cooper D, Odedra B, Haslam L, Earnshaw J:  Endovascular managment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 56(4):579-8 Epub 2015 Apr 146.
  45. Katsargyris A, Oikonomou K, Klonaris, Bal A, Yanar F, Verhoeven EL: Common iliac and hypogastric aneurysms open and endovascular repair. J CArdiovasc Surg 2015; 56(2):249-55. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
  46. Uberoi R, Tsetis D, Shrivastava V, Morgan R, Belli AM: Standard of practice for the interventional management of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34:3–13. doi: 10.1007/ s00270-010-0055-0.
  47. Barrionuevo P, Malas MB, Nejim B, Haddad A, Morrow A, Ponce O, et al: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of visceral artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72:40-45S. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs2020.05. 018
  48. Dezfouli SA, Ramouz A, Demirel S, De-Hua C, Mehrabi A, Bockler D, et al: Multimodal repair of renal artery aneurysm – 10-year single center experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 82:303–13.  doi: 10.1016/j. avsg. 2021.10. 049
  49. Yang M, Li L, Liu Y, Su Q, Dong Z, Li G, et al: Therapeutic management of isolated internal iliac artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72, 1968–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.038
  50. Song C, Dong, Yu G, Zhou J, Xiang, Pei Y et al: Comparison of open surgery and endovascular procedures as a therapeutic choice for visceral artery aneurysms. Vascular 2018; 26:387–92. doi: 0.1177/ 1708538117744102.
  51. Mazzaccaro D, Carmo M, Nano G, Barbetta I, Settembrini AM, Occhiuto MT, et al: Treatment options for visceral artery aneurysms: ten-year experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 56(3):423-32.  Epub 2013 Jul 18.
  52. Bakal CW, Silberrzweigl E, Cynamon J, Sprayregen S: Vascular and interventional radiology. Principles and practice. 2002, Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. ISBN 9781638530220,
  53. Zhang Y, Xiang D, Lu Q, Wu M, Cui J: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of peripheral and visceral artery aneurysms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97:61–69. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29373.
  54. Van Veenendaal P, Maingard J , Kok HK, Ranatunga D, Buckenham T , Chandra RV, et al: Endovascular flow-diversion of visceral and renal artery aneurysms using dual-layer braided nitinol carotid stents. CVIR Endovasc 2020; 3(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00125-2.
  55. Massière B, Von-Ristow A, Vescovi A, Leal D, Fonseca LMB: Opções terapêuticas endovasculares para o tratamento dos aneurismas aortoilíacos. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes 2016; 43:480–85 doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016006008
  56. Batagini NC, El-Arousy H, Clair DC, Kirksey L: Open versus endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 35:1–8.  doi: 10.1016/j.avsg. 2016.01.035.
  57. Hiramoto JS, Messina LM: Visceral artery aneurysms. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2005; 7:109–117.  doi: 10.1007/s11936-005-0012-4
  58. Shukla AJ, Eid R, Fish L, Avgerinos E, Marone L, Makaroun M, et al: Contemporary outcomes of intact and ruptured visceral artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:1442–48.  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.005.
  59. Guo B, Guo D, Xu X, Chen B, Shi Z, Luo J, et al. Early and intermediate results of endovascular treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic visceral artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:140–48.  doi: 10.1016/ j.jvs. 2016. 02.037.
  60. Ren Y, Wang Z , Zhu L, Kan X, Chen L, Liu Y,  et al: Endovascular repair of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in 159 patients: twelve years’ experience of clinical technique. Abdom Radiol 2022; 47:443–51. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03326-y.
  61. Venturini M, Marra P, Colombo M, Panzieri M, Gusmini S, Sallemi C, et al: Endovascular repair of 40 visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms with the Viabahn stent-graft: technical aspects, clinical outcome and mid-term patency. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:385–97. doi: 10.1007/ s00270-017-1844-5.
  62. Vaquero-Puerta C,  San Norberto E, Martin-Pedrosa M, Del Río L, Cenizo N, Taylor J, et al: Endovascular management of splenic artery aneurysms. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc 2013; 20(2):97-101. PMID:24730019
  63. Iryo Y, Ikushima I, Hirai T, Yonenaga K, Yamashita Y: Evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of visceral arterial aneurysms after coil embolization. Acta Radiol 2013; 54:493-97. doi: 10.1177/ 0284185113475920.
  64. Koganemaru M, Abe T, Nonoshita M, Iwamoto R, Kusumoto M, Kuhara A, et al: Follow-up of true visceral artery aneurysm after coil embolization by three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014; 20(2):129–35. doi: 10.5152/ dir.2013.13236.
  65. Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H, Ono Y, Masada M, Mikami K, et al: Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: Correlation between packing density and incidence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24(12):1798–807.  doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.030.
  66. Künzle S, Glenck M, Puippe G, Schadde E, Mayer D, Pfammatter T: Stent-graft repairs of visceral and renal artery aneurysms are effective and result in long-term patency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:989–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.025.
  67. Balderi A, Antonietti A, Pedrazzini F, Sortino D, Vinay C, Grosso M: Treatment of visceral aneurysm using multilayer stent: Two-year follow-up results in five consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36(5):1256–61. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0705-0.
  68. Maruno M,  Kiyosue H, Tanoue S, Hongo N, Kashiwagi J, Mori H: Unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulse for evaluating visceral artery aneurysms after endosaccular packing with detachable coils: Preliminary results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24(2): 289–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.11.001.
  69. Muradi A, Yamaguchi M, Okada T, Nomura Y, Idoguchi K, Ueshima E, et al: Technical and outcome considerations of endovascular treatment for internal iliac artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 37(2): 348–54. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0689-9.
  70. Scholtz V, Meyer F, Udelnow A, Pech M, Halloul Z: Differential vascular medical management of visceral artery aneurysms in a single-centre consecutive patient cohort as part of an ongoing disease-specific systematic clinical prospective observational study. Zentralbl Chir 2015; 140(05): 478-85.  doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383101.
  71. Duan XH,  Ren JZ, Zhou GF, Zheng CS, Liang HM,  Dong XJ, et al.: Clinical features and endovascular treatment of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2015; 29(3):482–90. doi: 10.1016/ j. avsg.2014.11.008.
  72. Dorigo W, Pulli R, Azas L, Fargion A, Angiletta D, Pratesi G, el al: Early and intermediate results of elective endovascular treatment of true visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 30:211–18. doi:10.1016/ j.avsg. 2015.06.097.
  73. Madhusudhan KS, Gamanagatti S, Garg P, Shalimar J, Dash NR, Pal S,  et al: Endovascular embolization of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms using modified injection technique with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 26:1718–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.008.
  74. Pfister K, Kasprzak PM, Jung EM, Müller-Wille R , Wohlgemuth W , Kopp R: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to evaluate organ microvascularization after operative versus endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2016; 64:689–98. doi: 10.3233/CH-168003.
  75. Regus S, Lang W: Management of true visceral artery aneurysms in 31 cases. J Vasc Surg 2016; 153:347–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.008.
  76. Yadav RR, Boruah DK, Bhattacharyya V, Prasad R , Kumar S, Saraswat VA, et al: Percutaneous direct needle puncture and transcatheter N-butyl cyanoacrylate injection techniques for the embolization of pseudoaneurysms and aneurysms of arteries supplying the hepato-pancreato-biliary system and gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Imaging Sci 2016; 20,6: 48. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.196278
  77. Regus S, Lang W: Rupture risk and etiology of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2016; 50:10–15. doi: 10.1177 /1538574415627868.
  78. Venturini M, Marra P, Colombo M, Alparone M, Agostini G, Bertoglio L: Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in 100 patients: covered stenting vs transcatheter embolization. J Endovasc Ther 2017; 24:709–17. doi: 10.1177/ 1526602817717715.
  79. Cappucci M, Zarco F, Orgera G, López-Rueda A, Moreno J, Laurino F,  et al. Tratamiento endovascular de aneurismas y pseudoaneurismas de arterias viscerales mediante stenstents recubiertos: análisis de resultados inmediatos y a largo plazo. Cir Esp 2017; 95:283–92. doi: 10.1016/j. ciresp. 2017.04.011.
  80. Erben Y, Brownstein AJ, Rajaee S, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Mojibian H, et al: Natural history and management of splanchnic artery aneurysms in a single tertiary referral center. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68:1079–87 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs. 2017. 12.057.
  81. Bianchini Massoni C, Freyrie A, Gargiulo M, Tecchio T, Mascoli C, Gallitto E,  et al. Perioperative and late outcomes after endovascular treatment for isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 44:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.194.
  82. Martinelli O, Irace L, Di Girolamo A, Gossetti B, Gattuso R: Single-center experience in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60: 447–54 doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.010
  83. Ruhnke H, Kröncke TJ: Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: retrospective analysis of interventional endovascular therapy of 43 aneurysms. Rofo 2017; 189:632–39. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-107239.
  84. Pirvu A, Gallet N, Perou S, Thony F, Magne JL: Midterm results of internal iliac artery aneurysm embolization. JMV-Journal de Medecine Vasculaire 2017; 42:157–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2017.03.002
  85. Pfister K, Kasprzak P, Oikonomou K, Apfelbeck H, Derwich W, Wibke U, et al.: Management of visceral artery aneurysms with preservation of organ perfusion: more than twenty years’ experience. Zentral Chir 2018; 143: 516–25. doi: 10.1055/a-0750-6016
  86. Gao P, Dong D, Yang L, Yuan H, Wang M, Zhang J, et al. Technical issues and clinical outcomes of endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms: a single-center experience. Vascular 2018; 26:591–99. doi: 10.1177/ 1708538118776854.
  87. Kobe A, Andreotti C, Puippe G, Rancic Z, Kopp R, Lachat M, et al: Primary endovascular elective repair and repair of ruptured isolated iliac artery aneurysms is durable—Results of 72 consecutive patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1725–32.  doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.019.
  88. Kliewer M, Plimon M,  Taher F, Walter C, Hirsch K,  Falkensammer J, et al. Endovascular treatment of hypogastric artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.048.
  89. Pyra K, Szmygin M, Sojka M, Drelich-Zbroja A, Jargiełło T: Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms - evaluation of efficacy and safety based on long-term results.  Pol Przegl Surg 2019; 92:1–5. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.5895.
  90. Shibata E, Takao H, Amemiya S, Ohtomo K, Abe O: Embolization of visceral arterial aneurysms: simulation with 3D-printed models. Vascular 2020; 28:259–66. doi: 10.1177/1708538119900834.
  91. Berek P, Kopolovets I, Dzsinich C, Bober J, Štefanič P, Sihotský V, et al. Interdisciplinary management of visceral artery aneurysms and visceral artery pseudoaneurysms. Acta Med 2020; 63:43–8.  doi: 10.14712/ 18059694.2020.14.
  92. 92.  Keschenau PR, Kaisaris N, Jalaie H , Grommes J,   Kotelis D, Kalder J, et al: Management strategies for true and dissecting visceral artery aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 61:340–6. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11036-1.
  93. Kim J, Chun JY, Ameli-Renani S, Ratnam L, Mailli L, Pavlidis V, et al: Outcome of endovascular treatment of internal iliac artery aneurysms: a single center retrospective review. CVIR Endovasc 2022; 5(1):53. doi: 10.1186/ s42155-022-00330-1.
  94. Rabuffi P, Bruni A, Antonuccio EGM, Ambrogi C, Vagnarelli S:  Treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms with the use of cerebral flow diverting stents: initial experience. CVIR Endovasc 2020; 13;3(1):48 doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00137-y.
  95. Pitcher GS, Cirillo-Penn NC , Mendes BC , Shuja F, DeMartino RR, Manju Kalra M,  et al: Aneurysms of the superior mesenteric artery and its branches. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:149–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.047
  96. Stark JC, Eisenberg N, Mafeld S, McGilvray I, Roche-Nagle G, Howe KL: Assessment of open surgical and endovascular management of true hepatic artery aneurysms over 20 years highlights increased rupture risk in females. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75:1334-42. e2.  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.054
  97. Tipaldi MA, Krokidis M, Orgera G, Pignatelli M, Ronconi M, Laurino F,  et al. Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1):700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80150-2.
  98. Wolk S, Distler M, Radosa C, Ehehalt F, Bergert H, Weitz J, et al.: Management and outcome of true visceral and renal artery aneurysm repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406(3):623-30, doi:10.1007/ s00423-021-02149-1
  99. Vani K, Calligaro KD,  Maloni K, Madden N, Troutman DA, Dougherty MJ: Management of pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms based on a single-institution experience. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2021; 55(7):684–88; doi: 10.1177/15385744211017112
  100. Shimohira M, Nagai K, Ohta K, Sawada Y, Nakayama K, Shibamoto Y:   Safety of transcatheter arterial embolization for visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: incidence of intraprocedural rupture. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2021; 55 (4):361–66; doi:10.1177/1538574421992938
  101. Borghese O,  Ganimede MP, Briatico Vangosa A, Pisani A, Vidali S, Di Stasi C ,  et al.: The minimally invasive treatment of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: a retrospective observational single centre cohort study on glue embolization. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2021; 55(8):831–37, doi: 10.1177/ 15385744211028730
  102. Gong C, Sun MS, Leng R, Ren H,  Zheng K, et al.: Endovascular embolization of visceral artery aneurysm: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1):6936.  doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33789-6.
  103. Minici R, Guerriero P, Fontana F,  Venturini M, Guzzardi G, Piacentino F, et al.: Endovascular treatment of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms with ethylene-vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer-based non-adhesive liquid embolic agents (NALEAs). Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59(9):1606. doi: 10.3390/medicina 59091606
  104. Xiao N, Ahuja A, Patel R, Desai S, Nemcek JA , Resnick S: Median arcuate ligament compression associated with flow-related visceral aneurysms. J Vasc Inter Radiol 2023; 34(7):1176-82 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir. 2023.03.026.
  105. Fargion AT, Falso  R,  Speziali S, Biancofiore B, Esposito E, Giacomelli E, et al.: Results of current endovascular treatments for visceral artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:387-93, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.040.
  106. Oseni AO, Chun JY, Morgan R, Ratnam L: Dealing with complications in interventional radiology. CVIR Endovasc 2024; 7(1):32.  doi: 10.1186 /s42155-024-00442-w.