Assessment of Ambient Air Quality Index and Strategic Implementation of Sector-Specific Mitigation Measures in Maharashtra- A Case Study

Authors

Niyati Wadhawan1, Saptarshi Das2*
1Dhirubhai Ambani International School, Bandra East, Mumbai Maharashtra, India-400098.
2KPMG, Vikhroli, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India-400079.

Article Information

*Corresponding Author: Saptarshi Das, KPMG, Vikhroli, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India-400079.
Received: July 15, 2024
Accepted: August 05, 2024
Published: September 05, 2024
Citation:  Niyati Wadhawan, Saptarshi Das (2024). “Assessment of Ambient Air Quality Index and Strategic Implementation of Sector-Specific Mitigation Measures in Maharashtra- A Case Study.”. Environmental Pollution and Health, 2(1); DOI: 10.61148/EPH/007.
Copyright: © 2024 Saptarshi Das. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Air pollution poses significant challenges globally, particularly in urban areas, with dire implications for public health and environmental well-being. Maharashtra, one of India's most industrialized and urbanized states, exemplifies these challenges, grappling with the detrimental effects of air pollution on its population and ecosystems. This paper examines air quality dynamics in Maharashtra and proposes evidence-based interventions. Utilizing data from international organizations and local sources, a mixed-methods approach is employed, combining quantitative analysis with qualitative assessments. Results indicate a notable increase in the average Air Quality Index (AQI) from 2017 to 2023, with varying trends across regions. The study highlights the importance of city-specific action plans tailored to address top-contributing pollutants and sector-specific mitigation measures. Limitations include the focus on single pollutants and the absence of consideration for cumulative effects. Despite challenges, collaborative efforts among stakeholders are crucial for achieving sustainable improvements in air quality in Maharashtra.


Keywords: air quality index; city-level air pollution; ambient air quality; ambient air pollutants; sector-specific mitigation; maharashtra

1. Background and introduction:

Air, an indispensable element for sustaining life, is intricately linked to human survival, alongside water and land. However, the pervasive issue of air pollution poses significant challenges globally, particularly in urban areas, with dire implications for public health and environmental well-being. Nowhere is this challenge more acute than in India, where rapid development and urbanization have fuelled substantial air pollution concerns. Maharashtra, as one of India's most industrialized and urbanized states, epitomizes these challenges, grappling with the detrimental effects of air pollution on its burgeoning population and fragile ecosystems.

With a population exceeding 120 million, Maharashtra ranks among India's most populous states, accounting for a significant portion of the country's urban residents. The state's economic growth trajectory, driven by sectors such as manufacturing, services, and agriculture, has propelled rapid urbanization, leading to sprawling urban centres and burgeoning industrial complexes. Mumbai, the state's capital and financial hub, stands as a testament to Maharashtra's urban dynamism, attracting migrants and businesses alike, while also grappling with the adverse consequences of industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and urban sprawl.

In recent years, incidents of severe air pollution have garnered widespread attention in Maharashtra, particularly in urban centres like Mumbai. The city's hazardous air quality levels, exacerbated by factors such as vehicular emissions, industrial activities, and unfavourable weather conditions, underscore the urgent need for concerted action to address air pollution. These incidents serve as stark reminders of the interconnectedness of environmental and public health challenges, demanding comprehensive mitigation efforts and evidence-based policy interventions.

Beyond India's borders, numerous cities worldwide grapple with similar air pollution challenges, underscoring the global nature of the problem. From Beijing's frequent smog episodes to Los Angeles' historical struggle with vehicular emissions, urban centres worldwide face the daunting task of balancing economic development with environmental sustainability. These global examples underscore the imperative for collaborative, evidence-based approaches to combatting air pollution and safeguarding public health and environmental integrity.

This paper endeavours to provide insights into the dynamics of air quality in Maharashtra, India, and propose evidence-based interventions to mitigate pollution levels. By drawing upon data from international organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and other reports, alongside local sources such as the Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board (MPCB), the study seeks to analyse trends, identify key sources of pollution, and recommend targeted interventions to address the state's air quality challenges. Through a comprehensive examination of the issues at hand and evidence-based policy recommendations, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing efforts to combat air pollution in Maharashtra and beyond.

Previous studies have underscored the correlation between economic growth, urbanization, and deteriorating air quality in developing nations like India (Jafari et al., 2021). Mitigation strategies such as promoting cleaner transportation technologies, implementing emission standards for industries, and enhancing green infrastructure have been suggested to address these challenges (Kumar et al., 2019). However, more localized studies can help in contextualised approach towards climate and environmental policies and government programs.

2. Methodology:

The Maharashtra Pollution Control Board had deployed 23 air quality monitoring stations (refer annexure) strategically placed across different regions. These stations generate a substantial amount of air quality data, which is utilized to evaluate the air quality status of various areas in Maharashtra. Six key pollutants are monitored, namely particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3). The methodology employed in this study utilizes ambient air quality monitoring to assess the air quality status at stations located across the state during the period 2017 - 2023.


In India, primary air quality indexing system currently in use to depict the quality of air in different regions of the country has been developed by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur and adopted by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in 2014. The indexing system utilize the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) formula, which calculates the overall Air Quality Index based on the individual pollutant concentrations through segmented linear interpolation between breakpoint values (MPCB 2019).

For this study, a mixed-methods approach is utilized, combining quantitative analysis of air quality data provided by the Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board (MPCB) with qualitative assessment of mitigation interventions through focused interviews with concerned stakeholders. The dataset spans from 2017 to 2023, with a specific focus on pre- and post-COVID periods to account for potential lockdown-related variations (Naqvi et. al 2021; Dubey and Rasool 2023). Trend analysis has been conducted to examine year-on-year progress in Air Quality Index (AQI) at both state and regional levels. Additionally, city-wise and month-wise aggregates has been analysed to discern spatial and seasonal variations in air quality, providing comprehensive insights into the dynamics of air pollution in Maharashtra.

3. Results and Discussion:

Results of the study:

Preliminary analysis of the dataset reveals significant trends in AQI across Maharashtra, with variations observed both geographically and seasonally by conducting cluster-based analysis for western, central, and eastern part of Maharashtra.

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other color spectrum populated based on median value.

Table 1: Year-wise average AQI at state level and city level

Figure 1: Year wise average AQI for Maharashtra

Figure 2: Year wise average AQI for Maharashtra – Western Part

Figure 3: Year-wise average AQI for Maharashtra – Central Part

Figure 4: Year-wise average AQI for Maharashtra – Eastern Part

Table 1 and Figures 1 to 4 present the average Air Quality Index (AQI) calculated by averaging the AQI recorded at each station daily for each year. At the state level (Maharashtra), there is a noticeable increase in the average AQI from 83 in 2017 to 117 in 2023, with a dip to 82 in 2020 due to COVID-19 related lockdown measures. Upon comparing the average AQI across cities, it is evident that cities in the central part of Maharashtra, such as Nashik and Pune, consistently exhibit better performance compared to others. Aurangabad and Solapur also demonstrate relatively good performance across the years, with average AQI levels remaining similar to those in 2017. Conversely, cities in the eastern part of Maharashtra, such as Nagpur and Chandrapur, experience a consistent increase in average AQI levels, except for a decline during the COVID-19 period. In western part cities like Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan, and Vasai, there is no specific pattern observed, although Kalyan and Navi Mumbai consistently display higher average AQI levels compared to Mumbai, Thane, and Vasai.

    1. Month-wise trends for each year at state level and one selected city from each region - Mumbai (western part), Aurangabad (central part), and Nagpur (eastern part):

Table 2 displays the month-wise average AQI for Maharashtra, revealing a notable decrease in average AQI during the monsoon season (June to September). This trend is consistent across the region and is further confirmed in Tables 3 to 5, which analyse month-wise average AQI for cities such as Mumbai (western part), Aurangabad (central part), and Nagpur (eastern part). The data illustrates a similar pattern of sudden decreases in average AQI during the monsoon season. This phenomenon underscores the role of precipitation in washing out pollutants during the monsoon, while during the winter, pollutants tend to accumulate due to thermal inversion, contributing to poor air quality.

Month-wise Average AQIs - Maharashtra

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2017

111

104

114

105

81

56

51

48

53

77

104

101

2018

122

119

120

99

94

66

56

58

73

120

136

139

2019

161

138

128

105

95

64

54

58

51

77

107

120

2020

119

127

96

67

58

43

39

41

59

83

112

123

2021

139

125

126

99

82

67

58

64

59

95

121

179

2022

150

143

149

118

115

76

67

71

74

110

171

181

2023

180

165

141

114

95

100

76

65

71

133

141

123

Table 2: Month-wise average AQI for Maharashtra

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other colour spectrum populated based on median value.

Month-wise Average AQI - Mumbai

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2017

166

158

124

100

69

64

78

61

72

100

135

144

2018

104

78

59

65

73

71

67

61

77

127

146

148

2019

183

150

130

102

91

64

57

53

47

79

110

130

2020

130

139

99

66

54

44

41

41

64

89

120

126

2021

150

128

141

108

92

72

68

77

77

98

129

198

2022

177

167

160

116

115

73

67

68

76

116

173

193

2023

189

171

149

114

94

100

75

65

76

147

133

120

Table 3: Month-wise average AQI for Mumbai

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other colour spectrum populated based on median value.

Month-wise Average AQI - Aurangabad

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2017

139

123

117

114

96

59

51

43

45

80

112

116

2018

128

122

122

106

104

63

48

52

61

88

106

82

2019

73

74

93

87

81

80

54

65

63

63

77

87

2020

102

76

74

52

52

53

38

40

49

66

89

96

2021

91

78

85

79

60

56

38

51

56

80

83

111

2022

108

108

90

107

144

107

48

66

88

114

112

120

2023

144

129

106

86

80

69

55

59

74

93

131

114

Table 4: Month-wise average AQI for Aurangabad

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other colour spectrum populated based on median value.

Month wise Average AQI - Nagpur

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2017

87

92

114

105

96

54

58

51

48

68

85

80

2018

113

102

107

73

90

62

45

54

60

97

115

118

2019

116

133

112

121

169

55

45

37

48

62

107

96

2020

84

74

66

60

63

49

50

70

75

103

97

108

2021

112

81

90

102

60

65

76

64

55

116

111

123

2022

104

102

115

133

136

82

39

54

61

100

198

223

2023

202

130

123

93

81

67

38

59

52

125

210

151

Table 5: Month-wise average AQI for Nagpur

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other colour spectrum populated based on median value.

    1. Major contributors (pollutants) at state level and city level based on sub-indices values:

Tables 6 and 7 analyse the major contributing pollutant based on pollutant wise recordings at each station from 2017 to 2023, aiding in understanding the primary pollutant requiring mitigation to improve AQI levels. For this the sub-index was calculated for each pollutant for all recordings and then major contributor was found out for given station and day based on highest sub index value. At the state level, PM10 emerges as the maximum contributor across stations from 2017 to 2023, indicating that particulate matter is the predominant pollutant responsible for elevated AQI levels in Maharashtra and major cities. Moreover, Table 7 identifies the top three pollutants contributing to AQI at stations in each city, facilitating the development of city-specific strategies to address air quality concerns. Findings from the study corroborate the significance of particulate matter as a major contributor to poor air quality, particularly in urban areas with high levels of industrial and vehicular emissions.

No. of recordings that reported highest sub-index value of given pollutant in Maharashtra

Year

CO

NH3

NO2

O3

PM10

PM2.5

SO2

2017

578

 

316

287

1201

424

114

2018

326

1

382

318

3089

1279

2999

2019

464

 

1151

462

4330

1636

352

2020

784

1

1227

632

3558

1761

454

2021

630

2

1304

165

3429

2144

423

2022

595

8

1141

198

3759

1568

751

2023

601

 

660

162

4695

1479

515

Table 6: No. of recordings that reported highest sub-index value of given pollutant in Maharashtra

*Note: Highest value is coded as red and lowest value as green and other colour spectrum populated based on median value.

City

Top 3 pollutants

(No. of recordings reported highest sub index value of given pollutant)

Aurangabad

PM10 (1581), PM2.5 (429), O3 (201)

Chandrapur

PM10 (2685), PM2.5 (1038), O3 (419)

Kalyan

PM10 (913), PM2.5 (361), SO2 (338)

Mumbai

PM10 (10896), PM2.5 (4406), NO2 (3581)

Nagpur

PM10 (1060), PM2.5 (698), O3 (361)

Nashik

PM10 (1031), PM2.5 (813), O3 (493)

Navi Mumbai

PM10 (1655), PM2.5 (1022), SO2 (870)

Pune

PM10 (871), CO (707), PM2.5 (514)

Solapur

PM10 (1527), NO2 (385), CO (249)

Thane

PM10 (1248), PM2.5 (420), NO2 (359)

Vasai

PM10 (594), PM2.5 (465), NO2 (379)

Table 7: Top 3 pollutants at city level during 2017 to 2023

3. Discussion:

The results obtained from the study shed light on several actionable insights for the state government to effectively address the escalating levels of Air Quality Index (AQI) in Maharashtra.

One of the key action points highlighted by the results is the importance of utilizing the monsoon season as a preparatory phase for implementing ground-level interventions to mitigate the drastic increase in AQI levels during the winter season. This includes strategic planning for infrastructure development, strengthening administrative machinery, capacity building initiatives, and active involvement of local governments. This emphasizes the significance of seasonal variations in air quality and advocate for seasonal-specific interventions to effectively mitigate pollution levels.

Another crucial action point identified is the necessity of formulating city-specific action plans tailored to address the top contributing pollutants in each urban centre. For instance, Mumbai may focus on reducing PM10, PM2.5, and NO2, while Pune may prioritize the reduction of PM10, CO, and PM2.5. The regional variations in air quality trends are likely to be influenced by factors such as industrial activities, vehicular emissions, and meteorological conditions, underscoring the importance of localized interventions to combat air pollution challenges. Additionally, Ganguly et al. (2020) emphasizes the importance of identifying city-specific sources of pollution to tailor effective mitigation measures and improve air quality in urban environments. Conducting field studies and in-depth assessments in cities like Nashik and Pune, which have consistently exhibited good performance in terms of average AQI from 2017 to 2023, can provide valuable insights into best practices on the ground. By learning from these cities' successes, the government can develop targeted strategies and replicate successful initiatives in other regions to mitigate air pollution effectively.

The sector-specific mitigation measures need due attention to address major contributors to air pollution, such as PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and CO, to improve air quality in Maharashtra.

  1. Transport Sector: Transitioning to low-sulphur fuel and adopting Bharat VI standards for engine emissions are crucial steps to control NOx emissions (Gajbhiye et al., 2023). Promoting public transportation, especially electric modes, aligns with recommendations from the IPCC's recent report on climate change mitigation (IPCC, 2021). Regular checking of vehicles through Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificates is essential for ensuring compliance with emission standards (Dandapat et al., 2020). Implementing measures such as creating green buffers along traffic corridors and using water sprays at major traffic intersections have been proven effective in reducing emissions (Kumar et al., 2019). Emphasizing the importance of regular maintenance for diesel particulate filters and catalytic reduction systems is crucial for ensuring the proper functioning of emission control devices (Dey et al., 2020).
  2. Industries Sector: Implementing National Emission Trading Schemes (ETS) aligns with recommendations from the UNEP's "Emissions Gap Report," which advocates for market-based mechanisms such as cap and trade through carbon credits to incentivize emissions reduction (UNEP, 2020). These mechanisms can be established for all possible industries and technology can leveraged for ease of trade of such carbon credits. Enforcing stringent standards for industries through regular auditing systems and promoting the shift towards cleaner fuels are essential measures supported by the IPCC's recent report on climate change mitigation (IPCC, 2021). Promoting the adoption of zig-zag brick kiln technology and ensuring the installation of air pollution control devices are crucial steps in reducing industrial emissions. Mandating Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) across all polluting industries is essential for effective monitoring and enforcement of emission standards (UNEP, 2020).
  3. Construction Sector: Ensuring the covering of construction material, strict enforcement of CPCB/MPCB guidelines for construction, restriction on storage of materials along roads, and water sprinkling on debris are essential measures to reduce dust emissions during construction. Recycling of construction and demolition waste and strict waste management protocols contribute to reducing pollution from construction activities (World Bank, 2018).
  4. Residential and Commercial Buildings Sector: Banning the use of coal and biomass in residential areas, promoting energy-efficient appliances, adopting cleaner fuels, and implementing strict regulations against open burning are crucial for reducing emissions from residential and commercial buildings. Incentivizing the adoption of clean cooking practices and cleaner fuels can further contribute to improving indoor air quality.

By implementing these sector-specific mitigation measures and policy interventions, Maharashtra can effectively combat air pollution and safeguard public health and the environment. Collaboration among government agencies, industries, civil society organizations, and the public is essential for the successful implementation of these measures and achieving sustainable improvements in air quality.

5. Limitations of the study:

The primary limitation of the air quality indexing system is its focus on representing the level of only one pollutant at a time, resulting in an index value based on the concentration of a single pollutant. This limitation restricts the systems from capturing the cumulative impact of multiple pollutants on air quality, thus providing an incomplete picture of overall air pollution levels.

Another critical limitation is the absence of consideration for the synergistic effects of pollutants on human health, ecosystems, and the environment within current air quality systems. While individual pollutant concentrations may fall below regulatory limits, the combined effect of multiple pollutants could still pose significant risks to public health and ecological integrity. Failure to account for these cumulative effects may result in underestimation of air pollution-related health impacts and hinder efforts to implement targeted mitigation strategies.

3. Conclusion:

In conclusion, the objective of the research is to provide valuable insights into the dynamics of air quality in Maharashtra, India, and propose evidence-based interventions to mitigate pollution levels. The study utilized a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of air quality data with qualitative assessments of mitigation interventions, to offer comprehensive insights into the state's air quality challenges.

The findings reveal a notable increase in the average Air Quality Index (AQI) from 2017 to 2023, with varying trends across regions. City-specific action plans tailored to address top contributing pollutants emerged as crucial strategies for effective mitigation. Sector-specific interventions targeting key sources of pollution in transport, industries, construction, and residential/commercial sectors were identified as essential measures to improve air quality in Maharashtra.

Despite the challenges and limitations, collaborative efforts among stakeholders are crucial for achieving sustainable improvements in air quality. By implementing sector-specific mitigation measures and policy interventions, Maharashtra can effectively combat air pollution, safeguard public health, and promote sustainable development.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of current air quality indexing systems, including their focus on single pollutants and the absence of consideration for cumulative effects.

Moving forward, ongoing research, continuous monitoring, and collaborative efforts among government agencies, industries, civil society organizations, and the public will be essential to track progress and adapt strategies to evolving environmental challenges. By prioritizing evidence-based interventions and fostering collective action, Maharashtra can pave the way towards cleaner air and a healthier environment for its residents.

Declarations:

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

Not applicable.

Consent for publication:

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials:

The data supporting the findings of this study can be made available upon request.

Competing interests:

I wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Funding:

The author did not receive any fundings for this research work.

Acknowledgements:

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Avinash Dhakne, IAS, Member Secretary, MPCB, whose expertise and guidance were invaluable during this research. His advice on research methodology and immense knowledge on field level challenges helped me to broaden my perspective.           My sincere thanks to Dr. Vidyanand Motiram Motghare, Joint Director, Air, MPCB, Mr. Nandkumar Namdeo Gurav, Assistant Secretary, MPCB, Dr. Vishwajeet Ramesh Thakur, Principal Scientific Officer, MPCB, and Mr. Dinesh Sonawane, Statistical Officer & IT HoD for their insightful discussions during focused interviews. Moreover, I am grateful to MPCB for providing continuous support to in providing access to database and helping me to understand the air quality index. My sincere thanks to entire Maharashtra Pollution Control Board team for providing this opportunity to study aspects around air quality index and mitigation measures therein.

References

  1. Dandapat, S., Ghosh, T., Shankar, U., Maitra, S., & Maitra, B. (2020). A relook at the pollution certification of in-use vehicles in India and a way forward. Asian Transport Studies, 6, 100020.
  2. Dey, S., & Mehta, N. S. (2020). Automobile pollution control using catalysis. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2, 100006.
  3. Dubey, A., & Rasool, A. (2023). Impact on air quality index of india due to lockdown. Procedia Computer Science, 218, 969-978.
  4. Dubey, A., & Rasool, A. (2023). Impact on air quality index of India due to lockdown. Procedia Computer Science, 218, 969-978.
  5. Emissions Gap Report (2020). UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (UNEP-CCC). https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020. (Accessed on 10 June 2024).
  6. Gajbhiye, M. D., Lakshmanan, S., Kumar, N., Bhattacharya, S., & Nishad, S. (2023). Effectiveness of India’s Bharat Stage mitigation measures in reducing vehicular emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 115, 103603.
  7. Ganguly, T., Selvaraj, K. L., & Guttikunda, S. K. (2020). National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) for Indian cities: Review and outlook of clean air action plans. Atmospheric Environment: X, 8, 100096.
  8. IPCC (2019). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.- O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press.
  9. IPCC. (2021). Special report on climate change mitigation.
  10. Jonidi Jafari, A., Charkhloo, E., & Pasalari, H. (2021). Urban air pollution control policies and strategies: a systematic review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 19, 1911-1940.
  11. Kumar, P., Druckman, A., Gallagher, J., Gatersleben, B., Allison, S., Eisenman, T. S., ... & Morawska, L. (2019). The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure, and human health. Environment international, 133, 105181.
  12. Kumar, P., Morawska, L., Martani, C., Biskos, G., Neophytou, M., Di Sabatino, S., ... & Britter, R. (2015). The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environment international, 75, 199-205.
  13. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, Air Quality Status of Maharashtra 2018-19 Report.
  14. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. (2018-19 to 2022-23). Air Quality Status Reports of Maharashtra.
  15. Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Roadmap for Reform for Policy Makers (2018). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/813181537537614202/pdf/130055-WP-P162603-WasteManagement-PUBLIC.pdf. (Accessed on 5 June 2024).
  16. Naqvi, H. R., Datta, M., Mutreja, G., Siddiqui, M. A., Naqvi, D. F., & Naqvi, A. R. (2021). Improved air quality and associated mortalities in India under COVID-19 lockdown. Environmental pollution, 268, 115691.
  17. Shah, D. P., & Patel, P. (2021). A comparison between national air quality index, India and composite air quality index for Ahmedabad, India. Environmental Challenges, 5, 100356.
  18. Sharma, S., Zhang, M., Gao, J., Zhang, H., & Kota, S. H. (2020). Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India. Science of the total environment, 728, 138878.
  19. World Bank. (2018). Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Roadmap for Reform for Policy Makers.