info@aditum.org    +1(205)-633 44 24

Effect of Weeds on Growth and Yield of Two Wheat Varieties (Triticum aestivum) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla in the Sudan Savanna, Yobe State, Nigeria

Authors

Idriss Ahamed1 , Halima Mohammed Abba2 , Mohammed Alhaji Bello3* , Abubakar Mohammed Maimota4
1,2 Department of Plant Sciences, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria.
3,4 Department of Biology, Umar Suleiman College of Education, Gashua, Nigeria.

Article Information

*Corresponding author: Mohammed Alhaji Bello, Department of Biology, Umar Suleiman College of Education, Gashua, Nigeria.

Received: June 01, 2026         |        Accepted: June 10, 2026       |       Published: June 12, 2026

Citation: Ahamed I, Halima M Abba, Mohammed A Bello, Abubakar M Maimota, (2026) “Effect of Weeds on Growth and Yield of Two Wheat Varieties (Triticum aestivum) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla in the Sudan Savanna, Yobe State, Nigeria” Agricultural Research Pesticides and Biofertilizers, 6(1). DOI: 10.61148/2994-0109/ARPB 092.

Copyright: © 2026 Mohammed Alhaji Bello. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Abstract

Weeds compete with crops for sunlight, water, nutrients and space which eventually cause yield loss. The study was aimed to investigate the effects of weeds on vegetative growth and yield of two wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla and to provide the checklist of weed species associated with growth and yield of this two wheat varieties and their phenology as well in Usur Bade Local Government Area, Sudan Savanna, Yobe State, Nigeria. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was adopted, with three replicates. Each block (replication) contained all four treatment levels randomized within the block. Weed-free plot was manually weeded constantly while weedy plot was left undisturbed to allow natural weed growth. Weed identified were collected and kept in the herbarium specimen. Standard key and checklist were utilized for plant identification and organized using Angiosperm Phenology Group (APG) classification system. A total number of 43 plants species, distributed within 16 families and 34 genera were identified. Weeding significantly increase the plant height (PH) of Norman Borlaug at 8 weeks with (PH 30.87 cm) in comparison to Atilla Gan Atilla with (PH 14.43 cm) at 4 weeks respectively, also on the number of tillers (NT) Norman Borlaug at 4 weeks has the highest value of (NT 5.99 cm) in comparison to Atilla Gan Atilla with (NT 5.39 cm) respectively, while the number of leaves (NL) of both varieties Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla at week 8 and 4 weeks are (NL 3.96 cm) and (NL 2.96 cm). The finding also reveals weeding significantly increase leave area (LA) of Norman Borlaug at 4 weeks with a value (LA 14.92 cm) and stem girth (SG) at 8 weeks with value (SG 1.48 cm) in comparison to Atilla Gan Atilla at 4 weeks with value (LA 13.71 cm) and stem girth at 8 weeks value (1.46 cm) respectively. On the yield, The weeded plots (W) showed significantly higher grain yield value 239.02 kg ha-1 for Norman Borlaug in comparison to non-weeded plot (NW) with value 236.46 ha-1 for Atilla Gan Atilla at p<0.05 and includes the number of replications using statistical test (ANOVA), the phenology revealed the highest value of planting to flowering in days was recorded on Norman Borlaug at 60 days produce flowers and on maturity weeded plot reaches (W 102 days to matured, compare to Atilla Gan Atilla flowering recorded 72 days and to matured value 127 days in (NW) yield productivity of both varieties resulted in better growth and yield than non-weeded condition, as also shows on phenology. The findings indicate that weed infestation is a major challenge to wheat production, significantly reducing wheat crop yield. The study recommends long term extension services so as to train the local farmers on the effects of weeds on vegetative growth and yield performance on wheat, and to trained farmers on the different methods of weeds control and to choice the best method to minimized the effect of weeds in order to increased wheat productivity.

Keywords:

Growth, Phenology, Productivity, Triticum aestivum, Varieties, Weed, Wheat

Introduction:

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a staple food for over 2.5 billion people worldwide, providing a significant portion of dietary energy and protein (Bayisa et al. 2025) wheat, commonly known as Triticum aestivum is a cereal grass place in the family poaceae with many species of wheat including Ttriticum aestivum and Triticum durum collectively make the genus Triticum. Wheat is grown throughout the world except in very warm tropics largely because of its wide adaptation and ability of its gluten to be moulded in different end products (Singh et al. 2023). The major producers of wheat in the developed world are Europe and North America, in the developing world, particularly China and India. At the same time, consumption largely outpaces production in Asia and Africa, making these two regions major net importers of wheat (Grote et al., 2021).

In Nigeria, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a strategic crop, because the domestic consumption is 4,200,000 MT Lake Chad Research Institute (LCRI, 2014) and Nigeria spends over US $ 4.0 billion foreign exchange annually on its imports, but national production is only 300,000 MT Lake Chad Research Institute (LCRI, 2016). Wheat is the second largest crop after maize in terms of production, about 771.71 million tons in 2017 in the world (Poudel et al., 2020). Wheat plays an indispensable role in global food security, providing approximately 20% of the world’s protein and caloric intake, also as a dietary staple for over 35% of the global population (Sharma and Sharma, 2025). Wheat occupies approximately 25% of the global cereal production area (Punia et al., 2019). It is typically milled into flour which is then used to make a wide range of foods including many forms of noodles and snacks. About 80% of the global cereal production comes from wheat, rice and maize, however, the yield is significantly affected by weed (Javald et al., 2020). The varieties of wheat are called clean white or brown if they have high gluten content and they are called soft or weak flour, if gluten content is low (Haruna, et al., 2017).

Wheat differs from other cereals because of the high gluten quality, and dietary (nutritional) and medicinal values. In Nigeria latitudes 10-14 N is generally suitable for commercial wheat production under irrigation between November to march, when the temperature ranges from 15-20oC lake chad research institute (LCRI, 2016).

Weeds compete with rice (crop) plants for nutrients, water, light, and space, leading to reduced crop growth and productivity (Mohammed et al. 2026) Weeds are unwanted plants that compete with the crop plants for nutrients, water, space, and light and this competitive ability of weeds depends on the various unrelated factors such as growth form of weeds, their density, and time of weed emergence in relation to crop emergence.

Wheat crops are affected by different varieties of weeds this include grasses, sedges and broadleaf plants. Grasses such as Digeteria horizantalis wild, Eleusine indica, Eragrostis ciliaris R.B, Glyceria fluctan, Echinochloa colona L, Portulaca oleracea, and sedges like Cyperus iria, Cyperus rotundus, Cyperus esculentus, Kyllinga erecta, and broadleaf such as Cleome gynandra, Commelina benghalensis ( L)., Ageratum conyzoides Linn. Eclipta prostata Linn, these weeds usually affect rice and wheat crops in a field. Weed infestation is a significant challenge that severely restricts the productivity of crops, among the various biotic stresses that affect crop production, weeds are recognized as one of the most significant and challenging issues (Faieq, 2025). Weeds are responsible for approximately one-third of the total crop losses caused by pests (Faieq, 2025).

The floristic composition, diversity and distribution of weeds within the crop fields depends on the cultural practices within the agricultural fields, crop type, tillage systems, soil type, moisture availability, location and season (Tiwari et al., 2020).

Yield loses associated to weeds in wheat may occur from initial stages to the last stage of maturity, harvest, threshing, winnowing and storing of wheat grains. Weeds are more resistant, hardy and making faster growth than wheat and retard growth and cause significant yield loss due to competition. Generally, weeds reduce wheat yield by 30-50% losses may reached up to 100% depending on weed species and density (Ayana, 2020); the level of damage differs depending on growing stage, vigor, seed production, regenerative capacities and time of germination. Weeds decrease productivity and even the quality of the harvested products, whether due to competition for water, sunlight, nutrient and space, allelophathy or parasitism (Monteiro and Santos 2022).

Studies on the floristic composition of weed communities and distributions of weed species provide weed biologist with the quantitative information that is necessary for designing weed management programs and provide baseline data for measuring changes in the weed flora in future. Moreover, such studies are helpful in determining how a weed population changes over time in response to selective pressures due to field management practices (Nkoa et al., 2015). Timely and accurate identification of paddy weeds is essential for implementing effective control measures, emphasizing their economic importance and providing visual guides to support farmers botanist, agronomist and researchers (Mohammed et al. 2026).

Nigeria has many wheat-producing states, but commercial production is primarily in the northern states such as Jigawa, Kano, Borno, Katsina, Kaduna, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe, Bauchi, and Zamfara State. Additionally, new areas with highland regions such as Plateau, Taraba and Cross River State (specifically Mambila and Obudu) through new rainfed varieties that can grow in the rainy season.

In general, weeds present the highest potential yield loss to crops along with pathogens (fungi, bacteria, etc.) and animal pests (insects, rodents, nematodes, mites, birds, etc, which are of less concern (Oerke, 2006). In addition, they harbor insects and pathogens which attacked crop plants. Furthermore, they destroy native habitats, threatening native plants and animals.

The existing study primarily focused on the effect of weeds on growth and yield of two wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla and the objectives is to provide a checklist of weed species and to determine the phenology in Usur Bade Local Government Area, Sudan Savanna, Yobe State, Nigeria where inadequate research conducted on the effect of weed on wheat growth and yield.

Materials And Methods Description of the Study Area

Usur village is a town located approximately six kilometers away from Gashua town, Gashua which is the headquarters of Bade Local Government Area. Bade Local Government Area is located in Yobe State, the Northeast, Nigeria between latitude 120 52I 18 N and longitude 100 58I 47 E with an altitude of 335m above sea level, it has an area of 772 Km2 with a population of 139,804 (NPC, 2010) (Figure 1) (Bello et al. 2024; 2025; Mohammed et al. 2026).

Vegetation

Usur village vegetation type is Sudan savannah with scattered acacia trees, there is an area of Sahel savannah consisting of highly sandy soil, clay and loamy soil in some place. The plants include mostly short and few tall trees about 5-10m e.g. Anogeissus leiocarpa, Acacia seyel, Balanites aegyptica, Faidherbia albida and grasses Cenchus biflorus, Heteropogon contortus, Tarmarindus indica, Baobob (Bello et al., 2024; 2025).

Climate

The average annual rainfall of the study area is 500-800mm with seasonal rainfall. Temperature ranges between 10-200C in December-January and 34-400C in March-May (Bello et al. 2025; NEAZD, 2015; Hassan et al., 2019). The soil is sandy loamy, high in bulk density, low porosity, weak structure and low in organic matter content (Alhassan et al., 2018; Bello et al. 2025).

Figure 1: Map of Nigeria showing Usur, Bade Local Government Area, Yobe State

Experimental Design

A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was adopted, with three replicates to account for potential soil variability across the field (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). Two wheat varieties Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla were evaluated under two weed management conditions; weed-free and weedy conditions. Each block contained all four treatment laid in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) as in the beginning of the paragraph, then the plots size’s, inter and intra plot boundary was made in the field. Each plot measured 3 m x 4 m, with spacing 20cm between rows in plants resulting in a planting density for approximately 200 seeds.

Table 1 Showing methods adopted for the collection of data

Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), Field work, 2025

Planting Method

Broadcasting method was used in an area of one hectare ploughed and seedbeds manually with hoe and shovel in rows, water channels passing between the rows linking every plot to allow water flows for irrigation and viability test.

Weed Parameter

Weed assessments were conducted at different wheat growth stages. The data collected on weed species composition and dominance.

Growth Parameters

Growth parameters were measured bi-weekly from 20 randomly selected plants per plot and these include plant height, number tillers, leaves, leaf area and stem girth.

Yield Parameters

At maturity yield parameters recorded are spike length (cm) number of grains per spike and grain yield in kg.

Temperature Ideal for Wheat Germination

Wheat can germinate at any temperature only that it will not bear grains unless at low temperature because it is a temperate crop, wheat seed germination generally falls within the range of 12°C - 25°C, with the optimum around 20–25°C. High temperature above 30°C tends to reduce germination. Wheat plant requires about 14-15°C optimum average temperature at the time of maturity, with 50-60% humidity for growth, above 25°C tends to decrease grain weight (Ruspa et al., 2023).

Soil Requirement for Wheat Germination

The soil in the study area is sandy loamy, high in bulk density, low porosity, weak structure and low in organic matter content that make the area advantage for farmers for wheat production where appropriate application of urea and NPK fertilizer were recommendable. According to Gikunda, (2020) who reported that wheat grow in a wide range of soils, but well-drained loamy soils rich in organic matter are considered the most suitable for germination and early establishment while light-textured sandy soils may not retain enough moisture for uniform germination and heavy clay soils can cause poor aeration and seedling emergence problems.

Identification of Specimen

Weeds were identified in the field by distinguished them from the desired plants by observing their morphological features such as roots, stem, leaves, flowers and fruits; the leaf shape, color, texture, margin and size of the leaf and leaf arrangement should be observe carefully, the flowers color, flower shape, flower arrangement should be observed; the stem and the roots system was observed by their distinguishing features of the stem such as hairy or smooth and root system such as tap root or fibrous root and root like structure like bulb and rhizomes was also observed other distinguishing features was also observed in the field for accurate identification. The use of weed floras, manuals, checklist and standard keys was used during identification like Akobundu and Agyakwa (1998) and Balogun, (2015), weed were organized using Angiosperm Phenology Group (APG) III) classification system. The weed specimen were collected and compared with herbarium specimen of the department of plant sciences Gombe State University where voucher number was given for each identified specimen, the identified weed species were represented and arranged alphabetically according to the distribution of the family and recognized through Raunkier (1934). The identified voucher samples were deposited at the herbarium of the department of plant sciences, Gombe State University.

Data Analysis

The data collected were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the differences among the means were separated at 5% level of probability using Least Significant Difference (LSD) with the help of SPSS V. 29 statistical software.

Results And Discussion

The result showed different weed species associated with growth and yield of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla. The families, genus, species and the common names of (43) species were identified within (16) families and (34) genera (Table 1).

Broadleaves are 30 (69.76%), grass 9 (20.93%) and sedges 4 (9.30%). The family with the highest number of species was Poeceae with 8 (18.60%), followed by Malvaceae 7 (16.27%). The weed species were first grouped based on life cycle and were found the dominant are annual followed by perennial and biennial were the least with corresponding 27, 15, and 1 representing 67.79%, 34.88% and 2.70% respectively. The life form based classification revealed that therophyte were found dominant followed by geophyte with corresponding value 39 and 4 representing 90.69% and 9.30% respectively. The diversity of weed reflects a moderately complex weed flora that may influence the growth and yield of the wheat varieties under investigation. According to a study reported by Gobena et al., (2025) 62 weed species from 33 families were documented in their study on the assessment and identification of major weeds affecting the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) The lower number of species in the present study could be attributed to differences in geographical location, field size, and management practices. Also, Gyawali et al. (2022) identified 38 common weed species in a study a review on effects of weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their management practices. In contrast, significantly higher weed species richness was reported by Panda et al. (2020), who documented 277 weed species belonging to 198 genera. These discrepancies can be explained by geographical variation, soil types, land use intensity, and anthropogenic disturbances such as pollution. The most dominant family recorded in this study was Poaceae, with 8 species. This finding is not consistent with the work of Gobena et al., (2025) and Gyawali et al., (2022) on wheat (Triticum aestivum), and reported Astereceae as the most dominant weeds species and this will be due to differences in the geographical location and soil type which consequently determine weeds species in a given area. The finding is aligns with the work of Bello et al., 2023 on their work on weed species composition in paddy field in Usur, Bade local government area, Yobe State, Nigeria, where they found poaceae as the most dominant with 20 species, it is also aligns with previous reports by (Ekeke et al. 2019; Panda et al. 2020 and Samba et al. 2020) who also found Poaceae to be the most represented family in similar agro ecological studies. The predominance of Poaceae may be due to their adaptability, fast growth, and high reproductive capacity, which enable them to thrive in various cropping systems and environmental conditions. Weeds flora can associate with wheat crop cultivation in many different dimensions. The weed flora in wheat fields can vary significantly across different regions and individual fields, this variation depend on a range of factors, including local environmental   conditions,         irrigation            practices,            fertilizer application, soil composition, and weed management techniques (Faieq, 2025). Amare, (2014) reported that weed flora in their study consisted of 83.3% broadleaf species, and 16.6% grasses. Among the grasses includes Avena fatua L. Phalaris paradoxa L., while the broadleaf weeds included Caylusea byssinica Meisn., C. trigyna L., Chenopodium album, L.. Weed management practice is very effective in order to have better harvest. Ahmed et al., 2020 in their study conducted in Bangladesh, reported that the common weed species present at the experimental wheat field included Amaranthus spinossus L., Anagallis arvensis L., Celosia argentea L., Chenopodium album L., Cleome rutidosperma DC., Cynodon dactylon (L) pers., Cyperus rotundus L., Digitaria ciliaris (Retz) Koel., Echinochloa colona (L) Link., and Phallantus nururi L. Tillage practice can have a significant impact on the dispersal patterns of weed seeds (Wang et al. 2022), tillage practice are essential in managing weed populations as they help to bury seed deeper in the soil profile (Faeiq, 2025).

Preventive method such as the use of clean farm equipment is very effective. Cultural method like hand weeding at 25 days after sowing (DAS) in wheat crops lead to notable improvement in several yield attributing parameters (Surin, et al. 2013).

Mechanical methods of weed control are also useful in managing weeds in agricultural fields as this approach involve the removal of weeds using tools.

The use of chemicals weed control is effective as the chemical leads to better cuticular penetration and stomatal infiltration, enhancing herbicide translocation and absorption resulting in more effective weed control, a foliar herbicide like clodinafop-propargyl and tribenuron-methyl require surfactant to improve control of weed (Buttar et al. 2022). Clodinafop-propargyl and tribenuron-methyl are post emergence herbicides used to selectively control grasses and broadleaved weeds in weed field.

The most effective weed management in wheat crop cultivation, is the use of integrated weed management practices as this practices require a range of strategies such as proper field preparation, using the stale seed bed techniques, effective residue management and choosing right planting time and method, fertilizer application, crop rotation, careful timing and method of herbicide application also contribute to effective integrated weed management strategies (Faeiq, 2025).

Effects of weeding on plant height (cm) of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

The plant height (PH) level from the study demonstrated weeding practices had a significant impact on plant height for both wheat varieties. Norman Borlaug under weeded conditions recorded the highest plant height value, particularly at PH8 weeded value 30.87 cm, compared to its non-weeded counterpart 29.95 cm. In contrast, Atilla Gan Atilla showed the lowest plant height under both weeded and non-weeded conditions at PH4 with values of 14.43 cm and value 12.26 cm, respectively (Table 2). These findings suggest that effective weed control supports better vegetative growth, likely due to reduced competition for essential resources such as nutrients, light, and water. The results are consistent with those of Ruspa et al. (2023), who reported the highest plant height (158.15 cm) in wheat plots treated with hand weeding, while the lowest plant height (120.36 cm) was observed in plots treated with clodinafop at 0.75 kg/ha post-emergence (POE). This reinforces the conclusion that manual weeding can significantly enhance wheat growth parameters compared to chemical weed control under certain conditions.

Influence of weeding on the numbers of tillers (cm) of Norman Barloug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

The influence of weeding and non-weeding practices on tiller production revealed that, Norman Borlaug under weeded conditions recorded a higher number of tillers (NT), with the highest value at NT4 5.99, compared to 5.44 under non-weeded conditions (Table 3). In contrast, Atilla Gan Atilla shows the lowest tiller value at NT8, with 17.59 tillers under weeded conditions and 15.75 under non-weeded conditions. This outcome suggests that weed-free conditions favor tiller development due to minimized competition for nutrients and other growth resources. The findings align with those of Ruspa et al. (2023), who reported a maximum tiller count of 8 under hand weeding and a lower count of 6 when treated with clodinafop at 0.75 kg/ha post-emergence (POE). These results confirm that manual weeding is effective compared to herbicide-based approaches under certain conditions.

Impact of weeding on leaf numbers (cm) of Norman Barloug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Weeding and non-weeding practices on leaf development shows both Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla exhibited similar trends in leaf number (NL) across all growth stages. This indicates a consistent pattern in leaf development between the two varieties, suggesting that leaf production may be genetically stable and less sensitive to moderate weed pressure under conditions of the study. The findings are not consistent with the observations of Sharma et al. (2015), who reported significant differences in leaf area between weeded and non-weeded treatments. In their study the highest leaf area (17.40 cm²) was recorded under hand weeding (T2 - weed-free), and lowest (13.26 cm²) was observed in the weedy check treatment (T1) (Table 4). This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in environmental conditions, crop variety, or weed pressure.

Weeding effect on leaves area (cm2) of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

The data from the study shows weeding practices significantly influenced leaf area (LA) in both wheat varieties. Norman Borlaug under weeded conditions exhibited the highest leaf area at LA4 with 14.92 cm², and 9.53 cm² under non-weeded conditions (Table 5). Similarly, Atilla Gan Atilla showed a greater leaf area under weeded conditions LA4 13.71 cm² than in non-weeded plots 6.31 cm². This result suggests that, the removal of weed competition enhances leaf development, likely due to improved access to light, water, and nutrients. The findings are consistent with those of Monika et al. (2023), who reported leaf area (10.24 cm²) in wheat under hand weeding, and (3.51 cm²) recorded with pendimethalin application at 750 g/ha. This confirms the effectiveness of manual weed control in promoting vegetative growth, particularly leaf expansion.

Stem girth (cm) responds in weeding practice of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla

The Stem Girth (SG) of the study shows both weeded and non-weeded conditions had a modest influence on stem girth in the wheat varieties assessed. In Artilla Gan Artilla, a slight increase in stem girth was recorded under weeded conditions with value SG8

1.46 cm, compared to 1.34 cm under non-weeded conditions (Table 6). This suggests that weeding may contribute to better stem development; the magnitude of difference was relatively small under the prevailing field conditions. However, these findings are not in line with the study by Monika et al. (2023), who reported a more pronounced difference in stem girth due to weed management practices. In their experiment, the highest stem girth (2.27 cm) was obtained under hand weeding, whereas the lowest (2.06 cm) was recorded in plots treated with pendimethalin at 750 g/ha. The variance may be attributed to differences in agro-ecological conditions, wheat genotypes, and management practices across locations.

Yield components of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Weeding is one of the greatest tools that demonstrate significantly that improved the grain yield performance of both wheat varieties. Norman Borlaug recorded a higher grain yield under weeded conditions SPSP 39.85 compared to non-weeded plots 36.71. Similarly, Atilla Gan Atilla produced the highest yield under weeded conditions 44.75 at PPSP, while the lowest yield was observed under non-weeded conditions 37.71 (Table 7). This improvement in yield under weed-free conditions highlights the importance of timely and effective weed management in wheat cultivation. Weed competition, particularly in the early growth stages, can severely reduce crop yield by limiting access to essential resources such as light, nutrients, and moisture. These findings are in line with recent research by Kumar et al. (2023), who reported significantly higher wheat grain yields under integrated weed management approaches, including hand weeding and selective herbicide application, compared to untreated plots. Consistently, earlier studies such as Amare et al. (2016) also reported superior yields in wheat under combined weed control treatments (2,4-D and hand weeding), which significantly outperformed untreated weedy checks. A study conducted in Bihar, where they found that hand weeding at 25 days after sowing (DAS) in wheat crops led to notable improvement in several yield attributing parameters Surin et al. (2013). The consistent outcomes across different studies and agro-ecological zones emphasize the role of weed control in improving wheat productivity.

Grain Yield (Kg) parameters of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

In (Table 8), weeding had a significant positive effect on grain yield in both wheat varieties. For Norman Borlaug, the highest grain yield was observed under weeded conditions 239.02 kg while the yield was notably lower in the non-weeded plots 118.00 kg. Similarly, Atilla Gan Atilla recorded a higher yield under weeded conditions 236.46 kg, and the lowest value under non-weeded conditions 117.00 kg (Table 8). These findings indicate that weed competition can severely reduce yield when left unmanaged. Effective weeding enhances plant access to essential resources such as nutrients, light, and water leading to improved growth and productivity. This result aligns with the findings of Amare et al. (2016), who reported that the highest grain yields (4322 kg/ha and 3989 kg/ha) were achieved using a combination of 2, 4-D herbicide at 2.0 kg/ha and hand weeding. Conversely, the lowest yields (1168 kg/ha and 1028 kg/ha) were recorded in untreated weedy plots. The consistency across studies underscores the crucial role of integrated weed management in maximizing wheat yield. Sasode et al. (2017) reported that performing two manual hand weeding at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) resulted to an increased in wheat grain to 4.66 t/ha.

Weeding influence on flowering to maturity of Norman Barloug and Atilla Gan Atilla

The phenological study indicated clear varietal differences in flowering and maturity durations influenced by weeding practices. The longest number of days to the initiation of flowering was observed in Atilla Gan Atilla under non-weeded conditions 72 days, while the shortest was recorded in Norman Borlaug under weeded conditions 60 days. Similarly, Atilla Gan Atilla under non-weeded conditions required the longest time to reach 50% flowering 79 days, and shortest duration was observed in the same variety under weeded conditions 75 days (Table 9). Regarding physiological maturity, Atilla Gan Atilla under non-weeded conditions reached maturity in 127 days, making it the longest duration observed, while Norman Borlaug matured earlier under weeded conditions at 102 days. These results suggest that weed competition delays flowering and maturity, likely due to resource limitation. This finding aligns with the work of Silva et al. (2021), who reported that in buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn), early flowering occurred in genotype S1 (66.8 days), while the late was in S2 (70.2 days). Similarly, 50% flowering was earliest in S1 (73 days) and late in S2 (77 days), and on maturity early was found from S2 (117.3 days) while late from S3 (120.0) days, this is demonstrating varietal and environmental influences on phenological traits.

Table 1: Identified Weed Species Associated with Growth and Yield of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla

S

/ N

Family

Genus

Species

Common Name

Hausa Name

Life cycle

Nativ e/

Exoti c

Life Form

Propa gation

 

1

 

 

2

Aizoecea

Sesivium

 

 

Alternanthe

Sesivium portulascastrum L.

Alternanthera

Sea Purslance

 

Joseph

Akuli-Kili

 

Chiyawa

Perennial Herbs

 

Perennial

E

 

 

E

T

 

 

T

Seed/ Vegeta tive Seed

 

 

ra

ficoidea L.

Coat

n Zomo

Herbs

 

 

 

3

 

4

 

 

Amaranthec

Alternanthe ra Amaranthus

Alternantheras Sesilis L. Amaranthus

Sessile Joy Purple

Mai Kai dubu Rukubu

Perennial Herbs Annual

E

 

E

T

 

T

Seed

 

Seed

 

5

ea              (Broad leaves)

 

Amaranthus

blitum

Amaranthus

amaranth

Spiny Pig

 

Namijin

Herbs

Annual

 

E

 

T

 

Seed

6

 

Chinopodiu

spinosus L.

Chinopodium

weed

Goose

gaasayya

Buro

Herbs

Annual

E

T

Seed/

 

7

 

m

Amaranthus

ficifolium L.

Amaranthus

food

Spreading

 

Namijin

Crops

Annual

 

N

 

T

Vegeta

tive Seed

 

8

 

Asteraceae

 

Artemisia

graecizens L.

 

Artemisia annua

pig weed

 

Sweet

gaasaya,

Rukubu Tazargad

herbs

 

Annual

 

E

 

T

 

Vegeta

 

9

 

 

Eclipta

L.

Eclpta prostrate

worm

wood False

e

Rimin

 

Annual

 

E

 

T

tive

Seed/

 

1

 

Apiaceae

 

Falcaria

L.

 

Falearia

daisy

 

Ockle

Sauro

 

Gwandar

Herbs

 

Bennial

 

E

 

T

Vegeta

tive Vegeta

0

 

 

vudgaris

weed

daji

 

 

 

tive

1

Cistaceae

Helianthenu

Helianthenum

Rock Rose

Balka

Perennial

E

T

Seed

1

 

m

numularium L.

 

 

Herbs

 

 

 

1

Cyperaceae

Kyllinga

Kyllinga erecta

Spike

Ayaa-aya

Erect

N

G

Seed/

2

 

1

 

Cyperaceae

 

Cyperus

Schumach

 

Cyperus

Sedges

 

Yellow

turare

 

Ayaa

Perennial

 

Perennial

 

N

 

G

Vegeta

tive Seed/

3

 

1

(Sedges)

 

 

Cyperus

esculantus L.

 

Cyperus iIria

nut sedges

 

Rice field

(Monier et.al., 2016)

Aya-ayaa

herbs

 

Annual

 

 

N

 

 

G

Vegeta tive

Seed

4

 

 

Linn.

flat sedge

 

Herbs

 

 

 

1

 

Cyperus

Cyperus

Nut grass

Ayaa-

Smooth

N

G

Seed

5

 

 

rotundus L.

 

ayaa Jiji

erect

Peremmial

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Cont’d.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S/N

Family   Genus

Species

Common Name

Hausa Name

Life cycle

Nativ e/ Exoti c

Life Form

Propagati on

16

16

Family   Chameacris ta

Fabaceae              Chameacris

Chameacrista nunosoides

Chameacrista

Japanese tea

Japanese

Bakiskis Balsama

Bakiskis

Annual herbs

Annual

N

N

T

T

Seed

Seed

17

ta

Crotalaria

nunosoides

Crotalaria

tea

Devilbean

Balsama

Birani

herbs

Annual

E

T

Seed

18

Indigofera

ratusa L.

Indigofera

Hairy

Makomi

Herbs

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

hirsuta L.

indigo

ya

Herbs

 

19

 

Casia

Casia

Golden

Bagaruw

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

mimosoides

Shower

an Kasa

Perennial

 

 

 

20

 

Lotus

Lotus

Asparagus

Karkakia

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

tetragonolobus

pea

 

Shrubs

 

 

 

 

 

 

L.

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

Heliotropiac

Heliotropim

Heliotropium

Dwaf

Rimi

Annual

E

T

Seed

 

eae

 

spininum

Heliotrop

 

 

 

 

 

22

Lamiaceae

Ocimam

Ocimum

African

Daidoya

Erect

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

gratissimum L.

basic

 

perennial

 

 

 

23

 

Brancheria

Brancheria  lata

Signal

Guraji

Loosely

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

(Schumach)

grass

Alnoar

grass

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gwadi

annual

 

 

 

24

 

Chloris

Chloris  Pilosa

Hedgehog

Lafar

Tepering

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

(Schumach)

grass

Fakara

erect

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

annual

 

 

 

25

Malvaceae

Sida

Sidarhobifolia L.

Arrow leaf

Faskara

Perennial

E

T

Seed

 

(Broadleave

 

 

sida

Saiwa

 

 

 

 

 

s)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

Sida

Sida acuta

Wireweed

Garmani

Erect

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

 

kaka

Perenial

 

 

 

27

 

Sida

Sida cordifolia

Flannel

Farar

Parennial

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

weed

Hankufa

Shrub

 

 

 

28

 

Corchorus

Corchorus L.

Maltan Jut

Laalo

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

 

 

crop

 

 

 

29

 

Corchorus

Corchorus

Jut

Laalo

Annual

N

T

Seed,

 

 

 

tridens L.

Mallow

 

erect Herbs

 

 

Stem

30

 

Corchorus

Corchorus

Jut

Laalo

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

tridens L.

Mallow

 

Herbs

 

 

 

31

 

Malvastrum

Malvanstrus

False

Ayaa-

Annual  or

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

commandelianu

Mallow

ayaa

Parennial

 

 

 

 

 

 

m

 

 

herbs

 

 

 

32

Poeceae

Digiteria

Digeteria

Crab grass

Karamin

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

(Grasses)

 

horizantalis wild

 

Duwaki

grass

 

 

 

33

 

Eleusine

Eleusine indica

Goose

Tuujii

Annual

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

grass

 

grass

 

 

 

34

 

Eragrostis

Eragrostis

Love grass

Tsintsiya

Tuffted (A)

N

T

Seed

 

 

 

ciliaris R.Br

 

komayya

lassely

 

 

 

35

 

Glyceria

Glyceria fluctans

Floating

Booki

Perennial

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

seet grass

 

herbs

 

 

/vegetativ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e

36

 

Heteropogo

Heteropogan

Spear

Silka-

Tufted

E

T

Seed

 

 

n

contortus L.

grass

tsika

pernial

 

 

 

37

 

Seteria

Seteria pumila

Yellow

Geron

Annual

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

foxtile

Darli

grass

 

 

 

38

 

Echinochlo

Echinochloa

Barnyard

Sabe

Tufted

E

T

Seed

 

 

a

colona L.

grass

 

annual

 

 

 

39

 

Brancharia

Brancharia

Signal

Garaji

Perennial

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

falcifera              (Trin)

grass

makarin

herbs

 

 

 

 

 

 

staff

 

fako

 

 

 

 

40

Portulacaca

Portulaca

Portulaca

Common

Babaa

Annual

E

T

Seed

 

e

 

oleracea

purslance

Jibjii

 

 

 

 

41

Rubiaceae

Rubia

Rubia tintorium

Rose

Madda

Perennial

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

Madder

 

herbs

 

 

 

42

Solanancea

Physalis

Physalis anguate

Goose

Tumatiri

Annual

E

T

Seed

 

e

 

L.

berry

n Kaji

Herbs

 

 

 

43

Utticaceae

Pilea

Pilea microphyll

Artillary

Karkaki

Perennial

E

T

Seed

 

 

 

 

Plant

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Effects of weeding on plant height (cm) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Variety/Treatment

PH2 (cm)

PH4 (cm)

PH6 (cm)

PH8 (cm)

Norman B (W)

5.3a

12.68a

21.80a

30.87a

Norman B (NW)

4.9b

12.01b

21.13b

29.95b

Mean

5.11

12.85

21.47

30.41

S E +

0.07

0.13

0.12

0.13

Artilla (W)

5.24a

14.43a

22.49a

31.36a

Artilla (NW)

4.7b

12.26b

20.44b

29.46b

Mean

5.09

13.35

21.47

30.41

S E +

0.07

0.13

0.12

0.13

Key: PH= Plant height, W-weeded, NW-non-weeded

Table 3: Influence of weeding on tiller count of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Z

NT2 (cm)

NT4 (cm)

NT6 (cm)

NT8 (cm)

Norman B (W)

00

5.99a

11.97a

18.34a

Norman B (NW)

00

5.44b

11.94b

18.00b

Mean

00

5.17

11.85

18.17

S E +

00

0.09

0.24

0.11

Artilla (W)

00

5.39A

11.43a

17.59a

Artilla (NW)

00

4.94B

10.21b

15.75b

Mean

00

5.17

11.82

18.17

S E +

 

0.09

0.24

0.11

Key: NT=Number of Tillers, W=Weeded, NW=Non-weeded

Table 4: Impact of weeding on leaf number of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Variety/Treatment

NL2 (cm)

NL4 (cm)

NL6 (cm)

NL8 (cm)

Norman B (W)

2.00a

2.96a

3.50a

3.96a

Norman B (NW)

2.00a

2.4b

3.11b

3.76b

Mean

2.00

2.96

0.00

3.96

S E +

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

Artilla (W)

2.00a

2.92a

3.07a

3.92a

Artilla (NW)

2.00b

2.21b

3.00b

3.43b

Mean

2.00

2.96

3.00

3.96

S E +

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

Key: NL= Number of leaves, N=weeded, NW=non-weeded

Table 5: Weeding effects on leaf area (cm2) of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Variety/Treatment

LA2 (cm2)

LA4 (cm2)

LA6 (cm2)

LA8 (cm2)

Norman B (W)

4.58a

14.92a

18.24a

27.34a

Norman B (NW)

4.37b

9.53b

14.82b

22.13b

Mean

4.40

9.53

15.03

22.34

S E +

0.01

2.77

0.12

0.14

Artilla (W)

4.42a

13.71a

15.38a

22.36a

Artilla (NW)

4.21b

6.31b

11.68b

17.11b

Mean

4.40

11.12

15.03

22.36

S E +

0.10

2.76

0.12

0.14

Key: LA= Leaf area, W=weeded, NW=non-weeded

Table 6: Stem girth responses in weeding practices in Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Variety/Treatment

SG2 (cm)

SG4 (cm)

SG6 (cm)

SG8 (cm)

Norman B (W)

0.49a

0.88a

1.30a

1.48a

Norman B (NW)

0.39b

0.78b

1.20b

1.38b

Mean

0.48

0.87

1.10

1.42

S E +

0.003

0.01

0.01

0.01

 

Artilla (W)

0.46a

0.86a

1.08a

1.46a

Artilla (NW)

0.39b

0.76b

1.11b

1.34b

Mean

0.48

0.87

1.10

1.41

S E +

0.003

0.01

1.01

0.01

Key: SG=Stem girth, W=Weeded, NW=non-weeded

Table 7: Yield components of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Variety/Treatment

SPL

SPSP

PPSP

Norman B

8.59a

39.85a

48.95a

Norman B

8.13b

36.71b

47.51b

Mean

8.36

37.88

46.23

S E +

0.07

0.42

0.47

Artilla B (W)

8.40a

39.63a

44.75a

Artilla B (NW)

8.12b

36.13b

37.71b

Mean

8.36

37.82

45.73

S E +

0.07

0.42

0.47

Key: SPL= Spike Length, SPSP= Seed Per Spike, PPSP= Pod Per Spike, W=Weeded, NW=Non-Weeded.

Table 8: Grain yield parameters of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties as affected by weeds

Treatment/Variety

Grain/Kg

Grain/Kg

Norman B (W)

239.02

119.55

Norman B (NW)

239.00

118.00

Artilla (W)

236.46

117.53

Artilla (NW)

235.95

117.00

Key: W-Weeded, NW-Non weeded, Kg-Kilogram

Table 9: Weeding influence on flowering to maturity duration of Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla wheat varieties

Treatment/Variety

Planting to Flowering

50% Flowering

Maturity/Harvest

Norman B (W)

60 days

75 days

102 days

Norman B (NW)

69 days

91 days

121 days

Artilla (W)

63 days

81 days

110 days

Artilla (NW)

72 days

79 days

127 days

W=Weeded, NW=Non-weeded.

Conclusion And Recommendation

The study were conducted to investigate the effects of weeds on vegetative growth and yield of two varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum) Norman Borlaug and Atilla Gan Atilla and to provide the checklist of weed species associated with growth and yield of this two wheat varieties and their phenology as well. The study concluded that 43 weed species were identified from 16 families and 34 genera; weed infestation remains one of the most critical constraints in wheat production, causing significant yield losses across different agro-ecosystem. In this finding weeding generally influence growth and yield productivity of both varieties resulted in better growth and yield in weeded plots than non-weeded plots condition, as Norman Borlaug yielded higher yield. Weeds control increased grain yield as also showed on phenology. Poaceace as the dominance weed, suggesting targeted poaceace (grasses) as specific herbicides for future trials. To increase wheat production with better harvest, the used of integrated weed management in wheat crop cultivation will be practiced. The adoption of integrated weed management not only enhances weed control and maintain yield but also contributes to long-term environmental sustainability and global food security. The study recommends long term extension services so as to train the local farmers on the effects of weeds control on vegetative growth and yield performance on wheat.

Acknowledgments:

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Plant Sciences, Gombe State University and Department of Biology Umar Suleiman College of Education, Gashua for access to laboratory and field facilities that facilitated this research.

Conflict Of Interest

The author declares, there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the article.

References

  1. Akobundu O. I. and Agyakwa C. W. (1998): A Handbook of West African Weeds. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan
  2. Alhassan, I., Gashua, A. G., Sunday, D. O. G. O., & Mahmud, S. A. N. İ. (2018). Physical properties and organic matter content of the soils of Bade in Yobe State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 2 (4), 160-163.
  3. Amare, T., Mulatu, D., and Hailu, G. (2016): Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Yield Components of Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) In Ethiopia; African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(4), 293–300. Https://Doi.Org/10.5897/AJAR2015.10570
  4. Amare, T. (2014): Effects of Weed Management Methods on Weeds and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield. African Journal of Agriculture Research, 9(24), 1914-1920.
  5. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III, 2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of the flowering plants APG III, Botanical Jornal of the Linnean Society, 161(2), 105-121
  6. Ayana, B. (2020). Wheat production as affected by weed diversity and other crop management practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS), 6(9), 14-21.
  7. Bayisa, M., Debeli, G., and Kasahun, C. (2025): Bread Wheat Consumption and its contribution to Nutrition: A Review of Patterns, Nutritional Value, and Policy Implications
  8. Balogun, O. H. (2015): Weeds, Forage and Useful Trees: Some Common Weeds/Plants of West Africa and Their Medicinal Uses. Shallom Publication 93, Challenge-Idi Odo, Ibadan.
  9. Bello, M. A., Abba, H. M., Mohammed, U., (2023): Weed Species Composition in Paddy Field of Usur Town, Bade Local Government, Yobe State, Nigeria. Journal of Botanical Research 5(2):29-48.              DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v5i2.5507
  10. Bello, M. A., Abba, H. M., Abubakar, Y. U., Mohammed, U., Said, A. I., Waru, H. Z., and Bulus E. (2024). Paddy Weeds as a Complementary and alternative Medicine for Health and illness. International Journal of Homeopathy & Natural Medicines, 10(1),              1-16. https://doi/org/10.11648/j.ijhnm/20241001.11
  11. Bello, A. M., and Abba, H. M. (2025): Weed Species Composition and Diversity of Paddy Field in Usur, Yobe State, Nigeria. Journal of Forest Science and Environment, 10(1), 52-65.
  12. Buttar, G. S., Kaur, S., Kumar, R. and Singh, D. (2022): Phalis minor Retz. Infestation in wheat crop as influenced by different rice straw management usage in Punjab, India, Indian Journal of Weed Science 54(1), 31-35.
  13. Ekeke, C., Ogazie, C. A., and Agbagwa, I. O. (2019): Checklist of weeds in University of Port Harcourt and its environs. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 23 (4), 585-592.
  14. Faieq, M. S. (2025). Integrated Approaches to Weed Management in Wheat Crops: A Comprehensive Review. ESRJ, 6392), 36-49.
  15. FAO (2016): Wheat Production Guide. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Ghersa, C. M. (2013): Agro ecological basis for managing biotic constraints. In Sustainable food production, (pp. 18-30) Springer, New York, NY
  16. Gikunda, R. M. (2021): Influence of Land Tenure and Farmer Income on Adoption of Indigenous Agricultural Practices in Chuka Sub-county, Kenya. Journal of Environmental Sustainability Advancement Research, 7
  17. Gobena T, Feyisa B, Adisu L., (2025) Assesment and Identification of Major Weeds on Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) In East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia. Journals of Chemical Environment And Biological Engineering 2025, Vol.9, N0, PP. 20-27 Https://Doi.Org/10.11648/Jcebe. 2025090.13
  18. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. (1984): Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons
  19. Grote, U., Fasse, A., Nguyen, T. T., and Erenstein, O. (2021): Food security and the dynamics of wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 617009
  20. Gyawali, A., Bhandri, R., Budhattoki, P., and Bhattal, S. (2022): Management practices. Food Agric. Econ. Rev. 2, 34-40.
  21. Hakim, M. A., Juraimi, A. S., Hanafi, M. M., Ismail, M. R.,Selamat, A., Rafii, M. Y., and Latif, M. A. (2014). Biochemical and anatomical changes and yield reduction in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under varied salinity regimes. BioMed Research International, 2014(1), 208584
  22. Hassan, Y., Jambo, U. M., Jajere, A. A., and Mbaya, L. A. (2019): Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Gashua: Issues and Prospective. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 7 (3), 1681-1689.
  23. Haruna, S. A., Adejumo, B. A., Chukwu, O., and Okolo, C. A. (2017): Getting out of the Nigerian" wheat trap": a multidisciplinary approach. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 6(1), 672-681.
  24. Javald, A. (2020): Effect of six problematic weeds on growth and yield of wheat. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(4), 2461-2471
  25. Kumar, P., Yadav, R. S., and Singh, D. (2023): Influence of Integrated Weed Management on Growth and Yield Attributes of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). Journal of Crop and Weed, 19(1), 87–93. Https://Doi.Org/10.22271/09746315
  26. Lake Chad Research Institute, Annual Report (2014): Wheat Production Brochure.
  27. Lake Chad Research Institute, Annual Report (2016): Wheat Production Brochure.
  28. Monier, M., Abd El-Ghani (2016): Traditional medicinal plants of Nigeria: an overview. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 7(5), 220-247.
  29. Mohammed A Bello, Halima M Abba, Bristone B, Hadiza Z Waru, Bulus E, Halima M Gishiwa, Yakubu M Danjaji., (2026) “Pictorial Guide to Paddy Weeds of Economic Importance: Agronomic and Ethnomedicinal Perspective” International Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, 2(1). DOI: 10.61148/ 10.61148/IJICM/015.
  30. Monika, S., Yadav, R., and Singh, D. (2023): Effect of Different Weed Management Practices on Growth Parameters of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). Journal of Crop and Weed Science, 19(1), 98–104.
  31. Monteiro, A., and Santos, S. (2022): Sustainable approach to weed management: The role of precision weed management, Agronomy, 12(1), 118.
  32. National Population Commission (NPC) (2010): Population Distribution by Sex, State, L.G.A. and Senatorial Districts p  34. NPC Website: www.population.gov.ng (Accessed on 14th May, 2020).
  33. NEADZP, (2015) North East Arid Zone Development Programme, Meteorological Data of Nine Local Government Areas in Northern Yobe State, 1992 – 2014. NEAZDP Hydromet Station, Garin Alkali.
  34. Nkoa, R., Owen, M. D., and Swanton, C. J. (2015) Weed abundance, distribution, diversity and community analyses. Weed Science, 63 (SP1) 64-90.
  35. Oerke, E. C. (2006). Crop losses to pests. The Journal of agricultural science, 144(1), 31-43
  36. Panda, T., Mishra, N., Rahimuddin, S., Pradhan, B. K., and Mohanty, R. B. (2020): An annotated checklist of weed flora in Odisha, India. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 27 (1), 85-101.
  37. Poudel, M. R., Poudel, P. B., Puri, R. R., and Paudel, H. K. (2021): Variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for agro-morphological traits in wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum  L.)  under normal  and  heat stress conditions. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 9(1), 65-74.
  38. Punia, S., Sandhu, K. S., and Siroha, A. K. (2019): Difference in protein content of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.); Effect on functional, pasting, color and antioxidant properties. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 18(4), 378-384.
  39. Raunkiaer, (1934): The Life forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford University Press
  40. Ruspa, R., Kundu, D., and Meena, R. K. (2023): Comparative Efficacy of Hand Weeding and Herbicide Application on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 209(3), 512–519.
  41. Sadode, D. S., Gupta, K., Joshi, K., Arora, A., Dixit, J. P., and Panse, R. (2017): Management of diverse weed flora of wheat by herbicide combinations. Indian Journal of Weed Science 49(2), 147-150.
  42. Samba, M. H., Yusuf, M. M., and Abdullahi, M. (2020): Weed Flora of Maize Fields Under Different Tillage Systems in Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. Savanna Journal of Agriculture, 15(2), 112–121.
  43. Sharma, R., Verma, R., and Singh, J. (2015): Influence of Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield Attributes of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 60(4), 562–567.
  44. Sharma, K., and Sharma, P. K. (2025) Wheat as a nutritional powerhouse: Shaping global food security. In Triticum-The Pillar of Global Food Security. IntechOpen.
  45. Silva, J. C., Oliveira, L. M., and Ramos, D. G. (2021): Phenological Variation and Maturity Dynamics of Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn) Under Different Environments. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 207(2), 155–162. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Jac.12435
  46. Singh, S.K., Kumar, S., Kashyap, P. L., Sendhil, R., and Gupta, O. P. (2023). Wheat. In Trajectory of 75 years of Indian agriculture after Independence (pp. 137-162) Singaphore: Springer Nature Singaphore.
  47. Surin, S. S., Singh, M. K., Upasani, R. R., Thakur, R. and Pal,S. K. (2013): Weeding Management in Rice (Oryza sativa)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping System Under Conservation Tillage. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(3), 288-289.
  48. Tiwari, P., Rautela, B., Rawat, D. S., and Singh, N. (2020): Weed floristic composition and diversity in paddy fields of Mandakini Valley, India. International Journal of Botany Studies 5 (3), 334-341.