Integrated and Management to Improve the Yield and Quality of Spring Maize Through Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers

Authors

Zohaib Wahab, Rafi Ullah*, Ijaz Amin, Umar Hayat, Hassan Khan, Muhammad Azeem, Ghani Subhan, Atta Ullah
Department of Agriculture (Soil Sciences) University of Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Article Information

*Corresponding Author:  Rafi Ullah, Department of Agriculture (Soil Sciences) University of Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Received: November 15, 2021
Accepted: November 24, 2021
Published: December 02, 2021

Citation: Zohaib Wahab, Rafi Ullah, Ijaz Amin, Umar Hayat and  Hassan Khan. (2021) “Integrated and Management to Improve the Yield and Quality of Spring Maize Through Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers.”, Journal of Agricultural Research Pesticides and Biofertilizers, 2(4); DOI:http;//doi.org/11.2021/1.1048
Copyright: © 2021 Rafi Ullah. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Chota Lahor, district Swabi Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on a sandy clay loam soil to evaluate the effect of organic (FYM) and in-organic (Urea) fertilizers on maize yield. The treatments T1(Control), T2(30 kg Farmyard Manure), T3(490 g urea), T4(15 kg FYM+245 g Urea) and T5(7.5 FYM+122.5 Urea), were arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD), having three replications. Net plot size was 3 m x 5 m. Data was recorded on eight quantitative traits i.e. soil pH, EC, plant height (cm), cob length (cm), cob weight (g), biological yield (kg ha-1), grain yield (kg ha-1) and thousand grain weight (g). All of the traits showed significant differences for the treatments applied. Maximum plant height (194 cm), cob length (18 cm), cob weight (215 g), 1000grain weight (273 g),biological yield (5680 kg ha-1) and grain yield (2139 kg ha-1) was obtained in the treatment where farm yard manure were applied with combination of urea i.e@15 FYM (kg) +245  Urea (g) followed combine application of 7.5 FYM (kg) +122.5 Urea (g) with plant height (181 cm), cob length (17 cm), cob weight (206 g), 1000grain weight (272 g), biological yield (5309 kg ha-1) and grain yield (2084 kg ha-1). Minimum plant height (168 cm), cob length (14 cm), cob weight (189 g), 1000grain weight (264 g), biological yield (3670 kg ha-1) and grain yield (1400 kg ha-1) was obtained in the treatment where no fertilizer was applied (control). It was observed in the study that the combination of organic and in-organic fertilizers was the valuable source and showed better result on yield and yield related traits of maize crop. It was also observed in the study that organic fertilizer gave excellent response for yield and its related traits of maize crop as compared to inorganic fertilizer. Based on the result of this study the effect of organic fertilizer on maize crop must be further evaluated before it is recommended to farmers. 


Keywords: nutrient management; spring maize; quality; organic and in-organic fertilizers

Introduction:

Maize is an important cereal crop that provides staple food to large number of human populations in the world. It is a tropical plant but at present its cultivation in subtropical and temperate regions is also done intensively on worldwide bases and it can successfully be cultivated twice in a year. In developing countries maize is a major source of income to many farmers (Tagne et al., 2008). In Pakistan corn is grown on 1049.7 thousand hectares’ area with a total yield of 4210.5 thousand tons and average yield of 3973 kilograms per hectare while in KPK corn is sown on 461.7 thousand hectares producing 857.7 tons’ grains with an average yield of 1849 kilogram per hectare. In Pakistan its production is less due to many constraints as the climatic condition of Pakistan is arid which has low organic matter due to rapid decomposition. (Rana et al., 2013).

It is grown twice a year (spring and autumn). It is not only a source of food, feed but also utilized as a major ingredient of animal feed and industrial product. Before the advent of chemical fertilizers, farmers mostly relied on organic matter as the sole source to promote health and productivity of the soil. Later on, the era of chemical fertilizers started, and farmers left the use of organic matter because chemical fertilizers were an effective substitute as a ready source of nutrients. However, inorganic fertilizers increase the crop yield but on the other hand; their haphazard use is worsening the soil structure and causing contamination in ground water (Sagardoy, 1993).In Pakistan, maize occupies third position after wheat and rice and 98% of the crop is grown in Punjab and NWFP. Pakistan grows maize on about 1.11 million hectares with annual production of 4.04 million tons of grain and average yield of 3.62 t ha-1 (GOP, 2009). In Pakistan the potential of crop is not being exploited satisfactorily due to many constraints. Among those, inappropriate nutrients supply is important (Oad et al., 2004).

The soils of Pakistan are generally low in organic matter, firstly because of arid climate resulting in a rapid decomposition of organic matter and secondly because very little organic matter is added to the soil. On an average most of the soils of Pakistan contain less than 1% organic matter. Soil fertility can be increased through the utilization of mineral as well as organic materials (Azad and Yousaf, 1982).

Nitrogen fertilizer plays an important role on improving maize grain yield and quality. The application of nitrogen enhanced the assimilate accumulation in the kernels after silking, and stimulated kernel setting and yield improvement (Ning et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2019). Nitrogen fertilizer plays an important role on improving maize grain yield and quality. The application of nitrogen enhanced the assimilate accumulation in the kernels after silking, and stimulated kernel setting and yield improvement (Ning et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2019).

In spite of substantial fertilizer uses in Pakistan, the crop yield is not increasing correspondingly, which reflect low fertilizer use efficiency (FUE). There are some problems related to chemical fertilizers such as inadequate supply or even unavailability of fertilizer at the time of need, adulteration and high cost (Ahmad, 1994). Further, continuous use of fertilizers creates potential polluting effect in the environment (Oad et al., 2004). The soil and climatic conditions of Pakistan are best for maize production but a number of factors such as poor soil fertility and inappropriate nutrient management are responsible for low yield of crop.

The maize crop can tolerate a wide range of temperature (5-450C), but very high or low temperature can have negative effect on yield. The temperature greater than 330C during pollination and tasseling stage speed up the various processes of reproductive parts and results in yield reduction and seed abortion (Rana et al., 2013). Organic fertilizers including farmyard manure, sheep manure and PM may be used for the crop production as a substitute of the chemical fertilizers because the importance of the organic manures cannot be overlooked. Worldwide, there is growing interest in the use of organic manures due to depletion in the soil fertility. Economic premiums for certified organic grains have been driving many transition decisions related to the organic production (Sasirekha, 2012). farming (Delate and Camberdella, 2004).  The integrated use of organic manure and nitrogenous fertilizer (urea) on growth and yield component of spring maize had a great effect (Dellin and Engstorm, 2010).

The integration of organic sources and synthetic sources of nutrients not only supply essential nutrients but also have some positive interaction with chemical fertilizers to increase their efficiency and thereby reduce environmental hazards (Ahmad et al., 1996). The integrated use of organic manure and nitrogenous fertilizer (urea) on growth and yield component of spring maize had a great effect (Dellin and Engstorm, 2010). The integration of organic sources and synthetic sources of nutrients not only supply essential nutrients but also have some positive interaction with chemical fertilizers to increase their efficiency and thereby reduce environmental hazards (Ahmad et al., 1996).

Materials and Methods:

A field experiment was conducted at Chota Lahor, district swabi Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on a sandy clay loam soil. The treatments T1(Control), T2(30 kg Farmyard Manure), T3(490 g urea), T4(15 kg FYM+245 g Urea) and T5(7.5 FYM+122.5 Urea), were arranged in randomized complete block design, having three replication Net plot size was 3 m x 5 m. Seedbed was prepared by cultivating the soil 2-3 times with tractor mounted cultivator each followed by planking. Maize single cross hybrid was sown on 20th of March in 2021. Sowing was done by rotary dibbling method (by placing 2 seeds per hill at 20 cm apart hills) on 75 cm apart ridges. In this experiment the crop was completely dependent upon the farmyard manure and Nitrate. Irrigation was done on weekly basis. Soil samples were collected from maize growing field of district Swabi. To keep the crop free from weeds, insect and pest chemicals like weedicides, insecticides and pesticides were applied properly. The composite soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-20cm from maize crop and 0-45 from overland soil and analyzed for the following parameters.

Results and Discussion:

Soil pH and EC (Electrical Conductivity) (ds/m):

The soil pH and soil EC data of spring maize as significantly (p<0.05) affected by different levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers under field condition is given in Table 1. It is obvious from the statistical analysis of the data that the application of urea increased the soil pH and soil EC of maize under field condition. The maximum soil pH (7.6) of spring maize was recorded in the treatment having 490 g urea (T3) as compared to 15 fym+245 g urea(T4) and the treatment applied. It was followed by the treatment control (T1) where no fertilizers were given. Likewise, compared to control and sole FYM treatment, the maximum soil ECdS/m of 3.2 was recorded in the treatment supplied with 490 g urea. This treatment was followed by the 3.59 to which 15 FYM+245 g urea was applied.

Table 1: Soil pH and EC of spring maize as affected by different levels of Organic (FYM) and inorganic (Urea) fertilizers Plant Height and Cob Length (cm):

The data concerning the effect of different levels of Organic and inorganic fertilizers on plant height is presented in Table 1. Results revealed that organic and in organic fertilizers significantly (p<0.05) increased the plant height of maize. The shorter (168 cm) plants in maize were recorded at control (T1) whereas the long (194cm) plants were recorded at treatment receiving 15 FYM (kg) +245 Urea (g) (T4). The plant height gradually increased with combine application of organic and in organic fertilizer that argues that integrated use of organic and chemical fertilizer plays greater role in the improvement of growth and development of plant. This may be due to, firstly the incorporation of organic manure in the soil which improved the physical properties of soil and secondly the application of chemical fertilizer which make it productive. Similarly, the cob length was found highest (18 cm) at T4 and was found lowest (14 cm) at control where no application was made. These results are in line with that of Achieng, et al., (2010), and Shah, et al., (2009) who reported that plant height, number of grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and harvest index of maize gave higher values, when N and FYM were integrated as compared to the alone application of the two sources of nutrients. Chapagain (2010), reported that application of farmyard manure along with 50% of the recommended urea fertilizer resulted in vigorous plant growth and increase in cob length, and grain yield of maize. The increase in cob length might be attributed to the availability of more nitrogen and other nutrients from both urea and organic manure required for plant development at least up to cob formation. These results suggested that adequate supply of nutrients from both organic and inorganic source throughout vegetative growth  was necessary for proper cob development in maize.

Table 2: Plant Height (cm) and Cob length (cm) of spring maize as affected by different levels of Organic (FYM) and inorganic (Urea) fertilizers

Cob weight (g) and 1000 grain weight:

The value of Cob weight and 1000 grain weight was significantly (p<0.05) affected by applying different fertilizers. The highest (215 g) value was recorded at treatment combination of (15 FYM (kg) +245 Urea (g) T4 followed by T5 (206) and T3 (205). Whereas the highest 1000 grain weight was (273 g) also recorded at the same treatment followed byT3 (273) and T5 (268).  There are significant differences in all treatment as compare to each other. It was followed by the 206.3 and the treatment which was applied to this was 7.5 kg farmyard manure+122.5g urea. These results are in line with that of Amoruwaet al. (1987) who reported that thousand grains weight increased with increasing nitrogen rate. Different yield attributing parameters like grain yield (t/ha), numbers of cobs/ha and thousand grain weights (g) were calculated for each variety in spring season of 2018 spring.

Organic and inorganic fertilizers on plant height is presented in Table 1. Results revealed that organic and in organic fertilizers significantly (p<0.05) increased the plant height of maize. The shorter (168 cm) plants in maize were recorded at control (T1) whereas the long (194cm) plants were recorded at treatment receiving 15 FYM (kg) +245 Urea (g) (T4). The plant height gradually

increased with combine application of organic and in organic fertilizer that argues that integrated   use of organic and chemical fertilizer plays greater role in the improvement of growth and development of plant. This may be due to, firstly the incorporation of organic manure in the soil which improved the physical properties of soil and secondly the application of chemical fertilizer which make it productive. Similarly, the cob length was found highest (18 cm) at T4 and was found lowest (14 cm) at control where no application was made. These results are in line with that of Achieng, et al., (2010), and Shah, et al., (2009) who reported that plant height, number of grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and harvest index of maize gave higher values, when N and FYM are applied in combination (Rafiullah et.al. 2021)

Table 3: Cob Weight (g) and 1000 grain weight of spring maize as affected by different levels of Organic (FYM) and inorganic (Urea) fertilizers

Biological yield and Grain Yield (kg ha-1):

Biological yield of maize was significantly (p<0.05) increased with farm yard manure and urea application (Table 4.4). The biological yield of maize increased from 3670 in control (T1) to 5680 kg ha-1 when the crop received farmyard manure with the combination of urea T4 (15 FYM (kg) +245 Urea (g)). This biological yield further increased to 5562 and 5309 kg ha-1 when the application was done with 490 g urea per plot and7.5 FYM (kg) +122.5 Urea (g) per ploti.e T3 and T5 revealing different responses at different applications rates.The higher response at these application treatments could be the exceeding demands of plant nutrient over the rate of supply from soil due to higher vegetative growths at different stages. Similarly, the grain yield of maize increased from 1400 in control to 1717 kg ha-1 when received 30 kg Farm Yard Manure alone (T2) which further increased to 2139 kg ha-1 when application was done with urea 490 g per plot alone, suggesting variable response to different fertilizers. However, the differences amongT3, T4 and T5were statistically similar. Combination of organic and inorganic resulted in higher grain yield than single application of FYM or urea alone.These results are in consistency with Khan et al., (2013) who studied response of spring maize to integrated nitrogen management and found  a significant increase in biological and grain yield of maize under field conditions. Moreover, the reason for the significant increase in maize yield is that urea is quickly soluble fertilizer and in the presence of FYM it improves nutrients supplying capacity to plants as well as water retention capacity of soil and thus increase both the biological and grain yield (Deksissa et al., 2008). Application of nitrogen provided better nutrition to maize which resulted in higher grain yield. Increase in grain yield of maize with the application of nitrogen may be attributed to better growth of plant. The improvement in growth resulted in significant increase in yield attributes like number of cobs per plant, grains per cob, cob length and cob girth and test weight of maize which ultimately contributed to higher grain yield of maize with the application of nitrogen. The beneficial effect of nitrogen on grain yield of maize has also been reported by Sahoo and Mahapatra and Kumar (2004-2008)

Table 4: Biological yield and grain yield of spring maize as affected by different levels of Organic (FYM) and inorganic (Urea) fertilizers

Conclusions:

It is concluded from this study that farm yard manure urea were the valuable fertilizers and showed better result on yield and yield related traits of maize crop. It was also observed in the study that organic fertilizer when combine with in-organic fertilizers showed positive response to yield and other plant growth traits of maize crop as compared to alone application of inorganic fertilizer. Based on these results, the effect of organic fertilizer on maize crop productivity and soil fertility must be further evaluated before it is recommended to farmers.  

Conflict of interest: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Declaration of Funding: This research did not receive any specific funding.

Acknowledgement:

We would like to thanks staff of department of Agriculture, University of Swabi for their support.

Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [rafiullah@uoswabi.edu.pk], upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bakhtavar, M.A., Afzal, I., Basra, S.M.A., Ahmad, A.U.H. and Noor, M.A., 2015. Physiological strategies to improve the performance of spring maize (Zea mays L.) planted under early and optimum sowing conditions. PloS one, 10(4), p.0124441.
  2. Liu, Y., Li, S., Chen, F., Yang, S. and Chen, X., 2010. Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(5), pp.769-775.
  3. Tian, L., Bi, W., Liu, X., Sun, L. and Li, J., 2019. Effects of waterlogging stress on the physiological response and grain-filling characteristics of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 41(5).
  4. Mahboob, W., ur Rehman, H., Basra, S.M.A., Afzal, I., Abbas, M.A., Naeem, M. and Sarwar, M., 2015. Seed priming improves the performance of late sown spring maize (Zea mays) through better crop stand and physiological attributes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 17(3).
  5. Ramadan, A.S.A.A., Mukhlif, F.H. and Najm, B.F., 2021. Genetic Analysis of Combining Ability and Gene Action of Yield and Its Components in Maize (Zea Mays L.) Using Full Diallel Cross. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, pp.1241-1256.
  6. Fan, Y., Gao, J.L., Sun, J.Y., Liu, J., Su, Z.J., Hu, S.P., Wang, Z.G. and Yu, X.F., 2021. Effects of potassium fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and potassium absorption characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines with different yield types. bioRxiv.
  7. Li, H., Kuang, N., Gou, Q., Ma, Y. and Li, Q., 2021. Effects of different film mulches on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer maize (Zea mays L.) in the North China Plain. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 67(2), pp.179-190.
  8. Zhang, F., Yang, X., Sun, S., Gao, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z. and Liu, T., 2021. A spatiotemporal analysis of extreme agrometeorological events during selected growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) from 1960 to 2017 in Northeast China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 143(3), pp.94
  9. Xomphoutheb, T., Jiao, S., Guo, X., Mabagala, F.S., Sui, B., Wang, H., Zhao, L. and Zhao, X., 2020. The effect of tillage systems on phosphorus distribution and forms in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil under maize (Zea mays L.) in Northeast China. Scientific reports, 10(1), pp.1-9.
  10. Brar, H.S. and Vashist, K.K., 2020. Drip irrigation and nitrogen fertilization alter phenological development and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(12), pp.1757-1767
  11. Fu, Y., Si, L., Jin, Y., Xia, Z., Wang, Q. and Lu, H., 2020. Efficacy of black plastic film mulching as a cultivation strategy to cope with leaf senescence and increase yield of rainfed spring maize (Zea mays L.). Soil Use and Management
  12. Mabagala, F.S., Geng, Y., Cao, G., Wang, L., Wang, M. and Zhang, M., 2020. Silicon accumulation, partitioning and remobilization in spring maize (Zea mays L.) under silicon supply with straw return in Northeast China. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(10), pp.1498-1514.
  13. Sharma, R., Adhikari, P., Shrestha, J. and Acharya, B.P., 2019. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to different levels of nitrogen. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4(3), pp.295-299.
  14. Voncossel, M., Steberl, K., Hartung, J., Pereira, L.A., Kiesel, A. and Lewandowski, I., 2019. Methane yield and species diversity dynamics of perennial wild plant mixtures established alone, under cover crop maize (Zea mays L.), and after spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Gcb Bioenergy, 11(11), pp.1376-1391.
  15. Liu, Y., Qin, Y., Wang, H., Lv, S. and Ge, Q., 2020. Trends in maize (Zea mays L.) phenology and sensitivity to climate factors in China from 1981 to 2010. International journal of biometeorology, 64(3), pp.461-470
  16. Ji, Y., Zhou, G., He, Q. and Wang, L., 2018. The effect of climate change on spring maize (Zea mays L.) suitability across China. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3804.
  17. Zhang, M., Geng, Y., Cao, G., Wang, L., Wang, M. and Stephano, M.F., 2020. Magnesium accumulation, partitioning and remobilization in spring maize (Zea mays L.) under magnesium supply with straw return in northeast China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(6), pp.2568-2578.
  18. Lu, H., Xia, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, Q., Xue, J. and Chu, J., 2020. Response of soil temperature, moisture, and spring maize (Zea mays L.) root/shoot growth to different mulching materials in semi-arid areas of northwest China. Agronomy, 10(4), p.453.
  19. Tian, L.X., Bi, W.S., Ren, X.S., Li, W.L., Sun, L. and Li, J., 2020. Flooding has more adverse effects on the stem structure and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) than waterlogging in Northeast China. European Journal of Agronomy, 117, p.126054.
  20. Khan, H.Z., Malik, M.A. and Saleem, M.F., 2008. Effect of rate and source of organic material on the production potential of spring maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci, 45(1), pp.40-43.
  21. Anatoliy, G. K and K. D. Thelen. 2007. Effect of winter wheat crop residue on no-till corn growth and development. Agron. J., 99: 549-555.
  22. Azam, S., M. Shafi., J. Bakht., W. Mohammad., M. Shah., M. T. Jan., M. J. Khan., Z. Shah and Raziuddin. 2010. Effect of integrated use of N on yield and N uptake of maize crop. Pak. J. Bot., 42: 3633-3638.
  23. Bari, A. 2003.Organic and inorganic N management for wheat and its residual effect on subsequent maize crop.Ph.D. thesis Department of Agronomy, Agric. University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  24. Basavaraju., S. D. 2007 Integrated N management in maize (Zea mays l.) in a vertisol of Malaprabha Command Area.Ph.D Thesis, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry College of AgricultureDharwad.
  25. Bhatti, A. U. 2006. Restoring crop productivity of eroded lands through integrated plant nutrient management (IPNM) for sustained production.Final technical Report 2003-2006, Pakistan Science Foundation Research Project, Deptt. Of Soil and Environmental Sciences, NWFP Agriculture University Peshawar, Pakistan.
  26. Bhatti, I. H., R. Ahmad., A. Jabbar., M. S. Nazir and T. Mahmood. 2006. Competitive behavior of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. Int. J. Agric. and Biol., 8: 165-167.
  27. Bokhtiar, S. M and K. Sakurai. 2005. Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity of plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 51: 325 – 334
  28. Brar, H.S. and Vashist, K.K., 2020. Drip irrigation and nitrogen fertilization alter phenological development and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(12), pp.1757-1767.
  29. Csatho, P. 1990. Effect of NPK fertilization and split application of N on lodging due to wind storm and grain yield of maize.Acta Agronomic Hungarica. 40: 281-294.
  30. Delate, K. and C.A. Camberdella. 2004. Agro ecosystem performance during transition to certified organic grain production. Agron. J., 96: 1288-1298.
  31. Egbe, O.M. and M. O. Adeyemo. 2007. Estimation of the Effect of Intercropped Pigeon Pea on the Yield and Yield Components of Maize in Southern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. Afric. J. Agric. Res. 2: 667-677.
  32. Fan, Y., Gao, J.L., Sun, J.Y., Liu, J., Su, Z.J., Hu, S.P., Wang, Z.G. and Yu, X.F., 2021. Effects of potassium fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and potassium absorption characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines with different yield types. bioRxiv.
  33. Fu, Y., Si, L., Jin, Y., Xia, Z., Wang, Q. and Lu, H., 2020. Efficacy of black plastic film mulching as a cultivation strategy to cope with leaf senescence and increase yield of rainfed spring maize (Zea mays L.).Soil Use and Management.
  34. Gangwar, K. S., K. K. Singh, S. K. Sharma and O.K. Tomar. 2006. Alternative tillage and crop residue management in wheat after rice in sandy loam soils of Indo- Gangetic plains. Soil and tillage Res., 88: 242-252.
  35. Haque, M. M., A. Hamid and N. I. Bhuiyan. 2001. Nutrient uptake and productivity as effected by N and potassium application levels in maize/sweet potato intercropping system. Korean J. Crop Sci., 46 (1): 1-5
  36. Havlin, J. L., S. L. Tisdale, J. D. Beaton, and W. L. Nalson. 2009. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. 7th ed. Dorling Kinderson (India) Pvt.Ltd. New. Delhi.
  37. Huang, B, W. Z. Sun, Y. Z. Hao, J. Hu, R. Yang, Z. Zou, F. Ding and J. Su. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability of soil organic matter and total N in an agricultural ecosystem as affected by farming practices. Geoderma. 139: 336-345.
  38. Ji, Y., Zhou, G., He, Q. and Wang, L., 2018.The effect of climate change on spring maize (Zea mays L.) suitability across China.Sustainability, 10(10), p.3804.
  39. Jilani, G., A. Akram, R.M. Ali, F.Y. Hafeez, I.H. Shamsi, A.N. Chaudhry and A.G. Chaudhry, 2007. Enhancing crop growth, nutrients availability, economics and beneficial rhizospheric micro flora through organic and bio fertilizers. Ann. Microbiol., 57: 177- 183.
  40. Khaliq, T., T. Mahmood, J. Kamal and A. Masood. 2004. Effectiveness of farmyard manure, poultry manure and N for corn (Zea mays L.) productivity. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2: 260-263.
  41. Khan, A; M. T. Jan; K, B. Marwat and M. Arif. 2009. Organic and inorganic N treatments effects on plant and yield attributes of maize in a different tillage systems Pak. J. Bot., 41: 99-108.
  42. Khan, H.Z., Malik, M.A. and Saleem, M.F., 2008.Effect of rate and source of organic material on the production potential of spring maize (Zea mays L.).Pak. J. Agric. Sci, 45(1), pp.40-43.
  43. Khan, M. A., M. Abid, N. Hussain and M. U. Masood. 2005. Effect of phosphorous levels on growth and yield of maize cultivars under saline conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol. (3): 511-514.
  44. Kiekens, L. 1995. Zn. PP. 284-305. B. J. Alloway (ed.). Heavy metals in soils.Blackie Acad. & Professional, Glasgow, UK
  45. Lelei, J. J., R. N. Onwonga and B. Freyer.2009 . Organic based nutrient management strategies: effect on soil nutrient availability and maize (Zea mays L.) performance in Njoro, Kenya. Afri. J. Agri. Res. 4(2): 92-99
  46. Li, H., Kuang, N., Gou, Q., Ma, Y. and Li, Q., 2021. Effects of different film mulches on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer maize (Zea mays L.) in the North China Plain.Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 67(2), pp.179-190.
  47. Liu, Y., Li, S., Chen, F., Yang, S. and Chen, X., 2010. Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(5), pp.769-775.
  48. Liu, Y., Qin, Y., Wang, H., Lv, S. and Ge, Q., 2020. Trends in maize (Zea mays L.) phenology and sensitivity to climate factors in China from 1981 to 2010. International journal of biometeorology, 64(3), pp.461-470.
  49. Lu, H., Xia, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, Q., Xue, J. and Chu, J., 2020. Response of soil temperature, moisture, and spring maize (Zea mays L.) root/shoot growth to different mulching materials in semi-arid areas of northwest China. Agronomy, 10(4), p.453.
  50. Mabagala, F.S., Geng, Y., Cao, G., Wang, L., Wang, M. and Zhang, M., 2020. Silicon accumulation, partitioning and remobilization in spring maize (Zea mays L.) under silicon supply with straw return in Northeast China. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(10), pp.1498-1514.
  51. Mahboob, W., urRehman, H., Basra, S.M.A., Afzal, I., Abbas, M.A., Naeem, M. and Sarwar, M., 2015. Seed priming improves the performance of late sown spring maize (Zea mays) through better crop stand and physiological attributes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 17(3).
  52. Malival., P.L. 2001. Agronomy at a glance.Agrotech Publishing academy, Udaipur.Pp 46.
  53. Mohammad, S., M. Kalbasi, and H. Shariatmadari. 2009. Cumulative and Residual Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application on Selected Soil Properties, Water Soluble P, Olsen-p and P Sorption Index. J. Agri. Sci., Tech. 11: 487-497.
  54. Mohsin, A.U., Ahmad, J., Ahmad, A.U.H., Ikram, R.M. and Mubeen, K., 2012. Effect of nitrogen application through different combinations of urea and farm yard manure on the performance of spring maize (Zea mays L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci, 22(1), pp.195-198.
  55. Mohanty, S.; N.K. Paikaray; A.R. Rajan. 2006 Availability and uptake of phosphorus from organic manures in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) corn (Zea mays L.) sequence using radio tracer technique. Soil Biol. Biochem., 38:81-90
  56. Montemurro, F., M. Maiorana, D. Ferri and G. Convertini. 2006. N indicators, uptake and utilization efficiency in a maize and barley rotation cropped at different levels and sources of N fertilization. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3):114-124.
  57. Mugwe, J. D. Mugendi, J. Kungu and M. M. Muna, 2009. Maize yields response to application of organic and inorganic input under on-station and on-farm experiments in central Kenya. Exp. Agric., 45: 47-59.
  58. Oad, F. C., U. A. Buriro and S. K. Agha. 2004. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on maize fodder production. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 375-377.
  59. Oktem, G. and A. Oktem, 2005.Effect of N and intra row space on sweet maize ear characteristics. Asian J. Plant Sci., 4: 361-364.
  60. Prabu, T., P.R. Narwadkar, A.K. Sanindranath and M. Rafi. 2003.Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of okra. ParbhaniKranti. Orissa J. Sci., 75(11): 709-711.
  61. Rafiullah, Khan, M. J., Muhammad, D., Mussarat, M., Huma, Adnan, M., ... & Amanullah Jr. (2021). Foliar versus soil phosphorus (P) application for improving P use efficiency in wheat and maize in calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(11), 1598-1610.
  62. Ramadan, A.S.A.A., Mukhlif, F.H. and Najm, B.F., 2021. Genetic Analysis of Combining Ability and Gene Action of Yield and Its Components in Maize (Zea Mays L.) Using Full Diallel Cross.Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, pp.1241-1256.
  63. Rasheed, M., H. Ali and T. Mahmood. 2004. Impact of N and sulphur application on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) crop. J. Res. Sci., 15:153-157.
  64. Rashid, A., S. Muhammad and E. Rafique. 2005. Rice and wheat genotypic variation in boron use efficiency. Soil Environ. 24:98-102.
  65. Rasool, R., S. S. Kukal and G.S. Hira. 2007. Soil physical fertility and crop performance as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in ricewheat system. Soil and Tillage Res., 96: 64-72.
  66. Rozas, H. R. S., H. E. Echevertia and P. A. Barbieri. 2004. N balance as affected application time and N-fertilizer rate in irrigated, no-till maize. Agron, J., 96: 1622-1631.
  67. Rozas, H. S., E. Echevenia, G. A. studdert and F. H. Andrade. 1999. No till maize N uptake and yield. Effect of urease inhibitor and application time.Agron. J., 91: 950-955.
  68. Saleem, A., H. I. Javaid, Z. Ali and I. Ullah. 2003. Response of maize cultivars to different NP-levels under irrigated condition in Peshawar valley. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 1229-1231.
  69. Shah, K. P and Arif, M. 2000. Management of organic farming: Effectiveness of farmyard manure and N for maize productivity. Sarhad J. Agric., 16:461-5.
  70. Sharma, R., Adhikari, P., Shrestha, J. and Acharya, B.P., 2019. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to different levels of nitrogen.Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4(3), pp.295-299.
  71. Sial, R.A; E. H. Chaudhary; S. Hussain and M. Naveed. 2007. Effect of organic manures and chemical fertilizers on grain yield of maize in rainfed area. Soil &Envron. 26:130-133.
  72. Sims, T., L.V. Bruce, L. G. Karen, M. Bill and V. Green. 1995. Evaluation of soil and plant N tests for maize on manure soils of Atlantic Coastal Plain. Agron. J., 87: 213-222.
  73. Tahir, M., Faiz, N. Nadeem, M. A., Khalid. F., Ali. M. 2009. Effect of different chelated Zn sources on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil &Envi. J. 28:179-183.
  74. Tasneem, K., Tariq, M., Kamal, J., and Masood, A. 2004.Effectiveness of farmyard manure, poultry manure and N for corn productivity. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology.1560-8530/2004/06-2-260-263.
  75. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In d.L. Sparks (ed.). method of soil analysis part 3.amer. soc.agron. 16:475-490
  76. Tian, L., Bi, W., Liu, X., Sun, L. and Li, J., 2019. Effects of waterlogging stress on the physiological response and grain-filling characteristics of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. ActaPhysiologiaePlantarum, 41(5).
  77. Tian, L.X., Bi, W.S., Ren, X.S., Li, W.L., Sun, L. and Li, J., 2020. Flooding has more adverse effects on the stem structure and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) than waterlogging in Northeast China. European Journal of Agronomy, 117, p.126054.
  78. Voncossel, M., Steberl, K., Hartung, J., Pereira, L.A., Kiesel, A. and Lewandowski, I., 2019. Methane yield and species diversity dynamics of perennial wild plant mixtures established alone, under cover crop maize (Zea mays L.), and after spring barley (Hordeumvulgare L.). Gcb Bioenergy, 11(11), pp.1376-1391.
  79. Xomphoutheb, T., Jiao, S., Guo, X., Mabagala, F.S., Sui, B., Wang, H., Zhao, L. and Zhao, X., 2020. The effect of tillage systems on phosphorus distribution and forms in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil under maize (Zea mays L.) in Northeast China. Scientific reports, 10(1), pp.1-9.
  80. Zhang, F., Yang, X., Sun, S., Gao, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z. and Liu, T., 2021. A spatiotemporal analysis of extreme agrometeorological events during selected growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) from 1960 to 2017 in Northeast China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 143(3), pp.943-955. Agriculture, 20(2), pp.511-526.
  81. Zhang, M., Geng, Y., Cao, G., Wang, L., Wang, M. and Stephano, M.F., 2020. Magnesium accumulation, partitioning and remobilization in spring maize (Zea mays L.) under magnesium supply with straw return in northeast China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(6), pp.2568-2578