Effect of Land Degradation on Livelihood

Authors

Kemalo Abdulmalik and Isreal Zewide*
Dept. of Natural Resource Management, College of Agriculture, Mizan-Tepi Unversity and Natural Resource Management, P,O.Box 260, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia

Article Information

*Corresponding Author:  Isreal Zewide, Dept. of Natural Resource Management, College of Agriculture, Mizan-Tepi Unversity and Natural Resource Management, P,O.Box 260, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.

Received: May 14, 2021
Accepted: May 24, 2021
Published: June 02, 2021

Citation: Abdulmalik.K and Zewide.I. (2021) “Effect of Land Degradation on Livelihood.”, Journal of Agricultural Research Pesticides and Biofertilizers, 1(3); DOI:http;//doi.org/05.2021/1.1015.
Copyright: © 2021 Isreal Zewide. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Land degradation is a process in which the value of the biophysical environment is affected by a combination of human-induced processes acting upon the land. It is viewed as any change or disturbance to the land perceived to be deleterious or undesirable. Land degradation: a decline in the quality or performance of land. Or erosion of the earth ‘s land surface by water, wind, or ice. Land degradation affects people and ecosystems throughout the planet and is both affected by climate change and contributes to it. The prolonged effect of land degradation has re sulted in erratic rainfall causing severe droughts at ir-regular intervals, and these droughts threaten the livesand livelihoods of millions of people. According to the FAO, the world's cultivated soils - meaning soils that have been rearranged - have lost between 25 and 75 percent of their original carbon stock, which has been released into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. The simulated results of costs of loss of milk, meat, and costs associated with weight loss of animals not slaughtered or sold associated with land degradation in grazing biomass.


Keywords: land; livelihood; anthropogenic factor; drought

1.Introduction to land degradation:

The Special Report  on Climate Change and Land (SRCCL) defines land as “the terrestrial portion of the biosphere that  comprises the natural resources (soil, near surface air, vegetation and other biota, and water), the  ecological processes, topography, and human settlements and infrastructure that operate within that  system” (Henry et al., 2018)

Estimates of the global area of degraded land range from less than 10 to 60 M km2 (Gibbs and Salmon, 2015)

Land degradation is a process in which the value of the biophysical environment is affected by a combination of human-induced processes acting upon the land. It is viewed as any change or disturbance to the land perceived to be deleterious or undesirable. Natural hazards are excluded as a cause; however human activities can indirectly affect phenomena such as floods and bush fires.

This is considered to be an important topic of the 21st century due to the implications land degradation has upon agricultural productivity, the environment, and its effects on food security.[3] It is estimated that up to 40% of the world's agricultural land is seriously degraded.[4]

According to the Special Report on Climate Change and Land of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: "About a quarter of the Earth’s ice-free land area is subject to human-induced degradation (medium confidence). Soil erosion from agricultural fields is estimated to be currently 10 to 20 times (no tillage) to more than 100 times (conventional tillage) higher than the soil formation rate (medium confidence).".[5]

There are four main ways of looking at land degradation and its impact on the environment around it:

A temporary or permanent decline in the productive capacity of the land. This can be seen through a loss of biomass, a loss of actual productivity or in potential productivity, or a loss or change in vegetative cover and soil nutrients.

Action in the land's capacity to provide resources for human livelihoods. This can be measured from a base line of past land use.

Loss of biodiversity: A loss of range of species or ecosystem complexity as a decline in the environmental quality.

Shifting ecological risk: increased vulnerability of the environment or people to destruction or crisis.

1.1. Land degradation is measured through a base line in the form of pre-existing risk of crisis or destruction:
Impact: the powerful or strong effect that something or somebody has. In the context of this study, impact refers to the effects of land degradation on activities that are means of livelihood in the study area such as crop and livestock productivity, firewood and water resource.
Land degradation: a decline in the quality or performance of land. Or erosion of the earth ‘s land surface by water, wind, or ice
Livelihood: Job, work or something that provides income to live. In the context of this study, livelihood refers to activities on which people depend to sustain their life like crop productivity, livestock productivity, and availability of water resource and firewood and others.
Sustainability: able to be maintained or exploiting natural resource without destroying the ecological balance of an area.
Equity: actions, treatment of others, or general condition characterized by justice, fairness, and impartiality.
Capability: the power or practical ability necessary for doing something.               
Asset: the property that is owned by a person or an organization

2.  Literature review:

2.1. Productivity loss of land:

Land degradation affects people and ecosystems throughout the planet and is both affected by climate change and contributes to it. In this report, land degradation is defined as a negative trend in land condition, caused by direct or indirect human-induced processes including anthropogenic climate change, expressed as long-term reduction or loss of at least one of the following: biological productivity, ecological integrity, or value to humans.( JoséM. and Aliyu S,Moreno Spain, Barau Nigeria: 07/08/2019)

2.2.  Traditional biomass provision and land degradation:

Traditional biomass (fuelwood, charcoal, agricultural residues, animal dung) used for cooking and heating by some 2.8 billion people (38% of global population) in non-OECD countries accounts for more than half of all bioenergy used worldwide (IEA ,2017)

Climate change impacts may result in increased productivity and carbon stocks, at least in the short term. For example, longer growing seasons due to climate warming can lead to higher forest productivity (Henttonen et al. 2017)

Land degradation is an important problem in Ethiopia, with more than 85% of the land degraded to various degrees. Only about 51% of land degradation represents the loss of providing ecosystem services. The remaining 49% represents the loss of supporting and regulatory and cultural ecosystem services (Gebreselassie et al., 2016).

Processes like ground subsidence can be affected by climate change indirectly through sea level rise (Keogh and Törnqvist 2019).

Due to land degradation in most developing countries, in particular, agricultural productivity showed a dramatic decline and reached the level beyond the subsistence requirement of a household (Kirui, O. K., and Mirzabaev, A. (2014)).

Region

TEV 2001 (million USD)

TEV 2009 (million USD)

Change in TEV (%)

Addis Ababa

72

55

−23.65

Afar

11,700

12,600

7.69

Amhara

34,300

33,100

−3.50

Benshangul

10,600

10,400

−1.89

Dire Dawa

240

185

−22.92

Gambela

6090

5620

−7.72

Harari

<1

69

−29.35

Oromia

73,800

68,400

−7.32

Somali

49,200

48,200

−2.03

Southern

28,500

26,800

−5.96

Tigray

11,000

9730

−11.55

Total

226,000

215,000

−4.87

Table 1: The total economic value (TEV) of land ecosystem services in Ethiopia

Source Calculated based on Nkonya et al. (2014), using MODIS data

2.3. Attribution in the case of land degradation:

Precipitation involves local processes of larger complexity than temperature and projections are usually less robust than those for temperature (Giorgi and Lionello 2008; Pendergrass 2018).

Changing rainfall regimes also affect below ground biological processes, such as fungi and bacteria (Meisner et al. 2018; Shuab et al. 2017; Asmelash et al. 2016).

Reduced in agricultural soils through the increase of respiration rates by tillage and the decline of below ground plant biomass inputs, soil organic matter pools have been diminished also by the direct effects of warming,not only in cultivated land but also under natural vegetation (Bond-Lamberty et al., 2018)

2.4. Interlink between land degradation and livelihood:

The prolonged effect of land degradation has re-sulted in erratic rainfall causing severe droughts at ir-regular intervals, and these droughts threaten the livesand livelihoods of millions of people (Nwokoro and Chima, 2017). Drought caused by erratic rainfall bringsincapability of farmers to acquire food and hence causesextreme food crises. Land degradation in the form of soil erosion and nutrient depletion affects households’pro-duction and investment decision.

Simultaneously, soil provides living space for humans and all other species of life, ecosystem services which are essential for water storage, regulation and supply, climate regulation, bio-diversity conservation and carbon sequestration (FAO, Soils, 2018).

Soils provide anchorage for roots and holds water and nutrients. Soils are home to myriad micro-organisms thatfix nitrogen and decompose organic matter, and armies of microscopic animals as well as earthworms and termites. We build on soil as well as with it and in it (ISRIC, 2017). Thus, soil is one of the most precious resources for sustenance of life

A limited resource also leads to differentiation of livelihoods due to unequal access to land and natural re-sources. Gessese (2018) also mentioned when the cultivation of land cannot support livelihoods, off-farm income becomes crucial.

Region

Cropland

Forest

Grassland

Shrublands

Woodland

Urban

Barren

Water

Addis Ababa

54.8

−82.6

−13.5

134.6

−60.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Afar

−36.3

3.5

−23.5

44.8

−77.8

0.0

−22.5

−28.9

Amhara

53.9

−72.9

6.5

−6.6

−47.2

1.1

−7.7

−2.1

Benshangul

−64.7

−89.5

−1.3

658.3

3.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

Dire Dawa

7.8

−100

−69.7

114.3

−1.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

Gambela

101.1

31.6

−60.4

1622.2

34.3

0.0

−53.3

26.5

Harari

750.0

−89.8

−43.2

49.8

−57.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oromia

21.4

−30.5

−11.2

2.2

13.5

0.0

−1.6

−8.1

Somali

−29.4

−90.3

−45.7

70.0

−15.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

Southern

31.9

−15.9

−8.5

0.4

5.8

0.0

−59.5

−11.7

Tigray

48.0

−95.8

−24.7

61.6

−55.6

0.0

−25.3

−36.6

Total

32.9

−25.8

−10.5

6.7

−1.8

0.1

−12.3

−7.8

Table 2: Change in land use land cover in case of our country in 2009 relative to 2001 (%)

Source Calculated based on Nkonya et al. (2014), using MODIS data

2.5. Estimated impacts of soil loss on livelihood by FAO:

With more than 90 percent of the world's food grown from soil, it's a problem that impacts the health, incomes and livelihoods of billions of people on the planet.

Soil erosion - when the uppermost layer of soil is shifted or worn away - is a growing threat and one that has the potential to impact the entire world.

In Malawi, for example, soil erosion shaved between 0.6 and 2.1 percent off the country's gross domestic product (GDP), according to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

Such a reduction in GDP is particularly painful for the low-income country. World Bank data shows per capita income in the African nation was roughly $389.40 in 2018 in comparision to the United States, where per capita income topped more than $62,641 in 2018, according to the World Bank. 

While it occurs naturally, soil erosion has been on the rise as a result of what the FAO calls "unsustainable" agricultural practices and "improper" land-use changes such as deforestation.

Soil erosion can lead to as much as a 3.5 percent increase in food prices as a result of a decline in agricultural production. This in turn can lead to tighter food supplies and higher prices.

"Degraded soil is no longer a source of income for farmers," Ronald Vargas, a soil scientist and the secretary of the FAO's Global Soil Partnership, told Al Jazeera. "Because of this, they then need to find alternatives such as migrating to cities."

Soil degradation, Vargas explains, is "a cause for rural poverty and triggers migration". At the same time, he adds, "food security, adaptation and mitigation, and even sustainable development is severely affected" by the problem.

2.6. Soil erosion also poses a threat to the environment:

According to the FAO, the world's cultivated soils - meaning soils that have been rearranged - have lost between 25 and 75 percent of their original carbon stock, which has been released into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide.

The agency says this is mainly due to unsustainable land management practices such as overpumping groundwater into soil and improper plowing - and that such land degradation lowers a soil's ability to maintain and store carbon, in turn contributing to climate change.

On World Soil Day, the FAO is imploring stakeholders - especially the largest greenhouse gas emitters - to not only practise sustainable soil management (such as mulching and covering crops to protect the soil's surface), but to also practice more sound environmental policies.

Land use/cover

2001

2009

Percentage change (%)

Cropland

8.51

11.30

32.7

Forest

5.49

4.07

−25.9

Grassland

28.50

25.50

−10.5

Shrublands

41.80

44.60

6.7

Woodland

22.40

22.00

−1.8

Urban

0.07

0.07

0.1

Barren

5.65

4.96

−12.2

Water

0.64

0.59

−7.8

Total

113.06

113.08

Table 3: Changes in land use land cover classification in Ethiopia between 2001 and 2009 (million ha)

Source Calculated based on Nkonya et al. (2014), using MODIS data

2.7. Cost of loss of milk and meat production due to land degradation in grazing lands:

The simulated results of costs of loss of milk, meat, and costs associated with weight loss of animals not slaughtered or sold associated with land degradation in grazing biomass. The blow table results show that land degradation in rangelands had a negligible effect on milk and meat production. The bigger proportion of milk and meat losses is experienced in warm semi-arid ($10.8 million), and warm sub-humid ($8.5 million)

Agro-ecological zones

Milk

Meat

Total loss (Milk and Meat)

Total gross loss—includes weight loss of animals not slaughtered

2007 US$ million

Tropic-cool semi-arid

4.535

0.338

4.873

6.194

Tropic-cool arid

0.003

0.003

0.006

0.004

Tropic-cool humid

0.145

0.005

0.150

0.198

Tropic-cool sub-humid

7.640

0.315

7.945

10.435

Tropic-warm semi-arid

10.262

0.507

10.769

14.016

Tropic-warm arid

7.087

0.922

8.009

9.680

Tropic-warm sub-humid

8.177

0.327

8.504

11.168

Total

37.849

2.417

40.266

51.696

Table 4: Cost of milk and meat production loss due to degradation of rangelands in case of our country.

Source Authors’ compilation

Based on farmers’ responses, six SLM practices were considered including crop rotation, intercropping, improved seeds,1 use of manure, use of chemical fertilizers, and soil erosion control (such as soil bunds, stone bunds, gabions, grass strips, terraces among others) were selected as major SLM technologies/practices adopted by small farmers in Ethiopia.

As shown in Fig. 1.  below crop rotation, chemical fertilizer use, and inter-cropping are the most common SLM practices adopted by most farmers. Crop rotation was practiced in about 56 % of the plots while fertilizer was used in about 39 % of the plots.

Fig. 14.2
Source:  Kirui (in press) unpublished Ph.D. thesis

3. Conclusion:

The solutions to land degradation need to be based on through addressing their local drivers. Better understanding of households’ behavior about land management as well as policy and institutional factors that affect such decisions are crucial, but usually underestimated in most measures to address land degradation in Ethiopia.

Many forms of land degradation occur in Ethiopia: water and wind erosion; salinization and acidification, and both physical and biological degradation of soils. More than 85 % of the land in Ethiopia is estimated to be moderately to very severely degraded, and about 75 % is affected by desertification. Recent estimates using satellite imagery show that land degradation hotspots over the last three decades cover about 23 % of land area in Ethiopia.

References

  1. Bond-Lamberty, B., Bailey, V.L., Chen, M., Gough, C.M., Vargas, R., 2018. Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades. (October 1, 2018)
  2. Brabant, P., 2010. A land degradation assessment and mapping method. A standard guideline proposal. Les dossiers thématiques du CSFD. N°8. November 2010. CSFD/Agropolis International, Montpellier, France. 52 pp.
  3. Conacher, A., Conacher, J., 1995. Rural Land Degradation in Australia. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press Australia.
  4. Eswaran, H., Lal, R., Reich, P.F., 2001. Land degradation: an overview". Responses to Land Degradation. Proc. 2nd. International Conference on Land Degradation and Desertification. New Delhi: Oxford Press. Archived from the original on 2012-01-20. Retrieved 2012-02-05.
  5. FAO. (2018). Soil Portal, Key Definitions. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/about/all-definitions/e
  6. Gebreselassie, S., Kirui, O.K., Mirzabaev, A., 2016. Economics of land degradation and improvement in Ethiopia. In: Economics of land degradation and improvement–a global assessment for sustainable development. Cham: Springer; 2016.
  7. Gessese, B.H., 2018. Impact of land use/land cover change on rural communities’livelihood of Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 6, 1.
  8. Gibbs, H.K., Salmon, J.M., 2015: Mapping the world’s degraded lands. Appl. Geogr., Accessed November 2, 25, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.024
  9. Henry, B., Murphy, B., Cowie, A., 2018, Sustainable Land Management for Environmental 27 Benefits and Food Security A synthesis report for the GEF. Washington DC, USA,)
  10. Henttonen, H.M., Nöjd, P., Mäkinen, H., 2017: Environment-induced growth changes in the Finnish forests during 1971–2010 – An analysis based on National Forest Inventory. Forest Ecology and Management
  11. Ian Sample (2007-08-31). "Global food crisis looms as climate change and population growth strip fertile land"The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  12. ILRI, 1989. Effectiveness and Social/Environmental Impacts of Irrigation Projects: a Review (PDF), In: Annual Report 1988 of the International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 18–34
  13. International Soil Reference and Information Centre. (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.isric.org/discover/about_soilsInternational Soil Reference and Information Centre. (2017).
  14. Johnson, D.L., Ambrose, S.H., Bassett, T.J., Bowen, M.L., Crummey, D.E., Isaacson, J.S., Johnson, D.N., Lamb, P., Saul, M., Winter-Nelson, A.E., 1997. Meanings of environmental terms. Journal of Environmental Quality 26, 581–589.
  15. Johnson, Douglas; Lewis, Lawrence. (2007), Land Degradation; Creation and Destruction, Maryland, U
  16.  Jump up to:a b  Stockings, Mike; Murnaghan, Niamh. (2000), Land Degradation - Guidelines for Field Assessment (PDF), Norwich, UK, pp. 
  17. Kirui, O.K., Mirzabaev, A., 2014. Economics of land degradation in Eastern Africa (No. 128). ZEF Working Paper Series. Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Germany.)
  18. Nwokoro, C.V., Chima, F.O., 2017. Impact of environmental degradation on agriculturalproduction and poverty in rural Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 7, 2.
  19. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (PDF). Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change. 2019. p. 5. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  20. Terminski, B., 2011. Towards Recognition and Protection of Forced Environmental Migrants in the Public International Law: Refugee or IDPs Umbrella? Policy Studies Organization (PSO) Summit, December 2011.