International Surgery Case Reports
OPEN ACCESS | Volume 7 - Issue 1 - 2025
ISSN No: 2836-2845 | Journal DOI: 10.61148/2836-2845/ISCR
Mister Seun Ayoade
Independent Researcher. Alumnus, College of Medicine University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
*Corresponding author: Mister Seun Ayoade, Independent Researcher. Alumnus, College of Medicine University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Received date: July 21, 2021
Accepted date: July 30, 2021
published date: August 07, 2021
Citation: Mister S Ayoade, (2021) “Faint Background Radiation, Anti Matter and The Cellular Dust Hypothesis.”. International Surgery Case Reports, 3(1); DOI: http;//doi.org/03.2021/1.1032.
Copyright: © 2021 Mister Seun Ayoade. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
I hereby propose that faint background radiation is nothing but cellular dust emission. I also attribute anti matter discrepancies with matter to the same phenomenon
Introduction
I hereby propose that faint background radiation is nothing but cellular dust emission. I also attribute anti matter discrepancies with matter to the same phenomenon. Hence the big bang was not the start of the universe but merely a stage in the universe’s manufacture. The microzymas set the big bang off. The uniform values of faint background radiation correspond with the uniform size of the microzymas [cellular dust never exceeds 500 nanometers].
Who’s Afraid of the microzymas?
Even though a simple click on a search engine or visit to a video uploading website will show motile microzymas “in living colour” the mainstream scientific community continues to deny their existence! Why this conspiracy of silence? If today the mainstream scientific community acknowledged the existence of the microzymas virtually every medical, biological and science textbook would have to be re-written. The very definition of what it means to be alive, sick or dead will have to be re-defined. And of course, the theory of evolution will be in peril. To all the scientists living in delusion and denial I say: “the handwriting is on the wall. You can run, but you can’t hide!” Far from the 1965 definition, the Oxford dictionary of 2010 (page 500) defines ether as “the air” and “the sky!”
Perhaps the big bang was not the start of the universe but the christening/naming ceremony/coming out party of the universe. The day the champagne bottle is popped is not the day the champagne bottle was made, the cork inserted, or the bottle label stamped. It, however, is the day the wine is poured in the glass and drunk. Like a cosmic sonic boom the big bang was a milestone in existence, not the very start of existence itself!