Screening Strategies and Integral Health Care for Colorectal Cancer

Authors

Lázaro Antonio Arango Molano MD, FASGE1, Ángel Rojas Espinosa, MD2*
1General Surgeon, Clinical-Surgical Gastroenterologist, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
2General Surgeon, Clinical-Surgical Gastroenterology Fellow, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.

Article Information

*Corresponding author: Ángel Rojas Espinosa, General Surgeon, Clinical-Surgical Gastroenterology Fellow, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.

Received date: December 17, 2021
Accepted date: December 28, 2021
published date: January 18, 2022

Citation: Arango Molano. L.A and Ángel R Espinosa. (2022) “Screening Strategies and Integral Health Care for Colorectal Cancer”, J of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research, 3(1); DOI: http;//doi.org/12.2022/2.10129
Copyright: © 2022 Ángel Rojas Espinosa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly Cited.

Abstract

The incidence of colorectal cancer is highly variable worldwide and is closely related to the Western lifestyle due to its low hereditary component.
It is estimated that more than 1.5 million patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer and more than 500,000 die from this disease worldwide.
The mainstays of treatment are early diagnosis with endoscopic resection, surgery or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies.
This review is aimed at primary care physicians and mainly at early detection programs, with which it is hoped to disseminate and standardize actions aimed at cancer control.


Keywords: colorectal cancer; screening; primary care

Introduction:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality vary considerably depending on the world population studied. Worldwide, the highest incidence of CRC is described in Australia, New Zealand, North America and the lowest in Africa and Central and South Asia [1]

Approximately 52980 Americans are expected to die from CRC annually, although due to timely endoscopic detection and management, the current rate has decreased since 1990 [2] But it remains the third most common cause of cancer death in the United States.

The literature suggests guidelines to begin CRC screening in those over 45 years of age, since the 50 to 60 years interval is the peak of CRC incidence. [3] The CRC is diagnosed after the onset of symptoms or in a screening program, which can be performed by colonoscopy or laboratory.

In Colombia during 2019 (Fondo Colombiano de Enfermedades de Alto Costo) registered 279,155 people with cancer in Colombia, of which 265,863 were cases of invasive cancer. [4]

The median age of new cancer cases was 61 years.  Of the cases (n=17,487) 59.90% were diagnosed in women, with a male: female ratio of 0.6:1 [4-5]

In the case of CRC, it ranked third in the period analyzed, including both in situ and invasive cases, 19,147 prevalent cases were reported, of which approximately 12% (n=2,285) were new cases. In terms of mortality, 1,901 deaths were reported. [4]

The 34.79% were diagnosed in stage III, with the median age being similar in all stages 62 - 64 years. [4]

Risk Factors: 

There are individual risk factors, such as genetic load and environmental exposure, which together can develop or increase the risk of CRC onset. It is well known that most CRC is sporadic rather than familial. 

Early onset CRC includes a history of first-degree relatives, hyperlipidemia, obesity, alcohol consumption, consumption of processed red meats. [8]

Modifiable Risk Factors:

Obesity: It is indicated that weight gain in early and middle adulthood is associated with an increased risk of CRC.

Red and processed meat: The World Health Organization classified the consumption of processed meat as carcinogenic and the consumption of red meat as probable carcinogenic, indicating that for every 50 grams of processed meat per day and 100 grams of red meat consumed per day, the risk of CRC is increased by 16% and 12%, respectively. 

Tobacco: It has a higher incidence and mortality for CRC, with a higher predominance in mortality for rectal cancer than for colon cancer. 

Alcohol: The risk for CRC is in moderate drinkers (two or three drinks a day) or heavy drinkers (more than four drinks a day) or in general more than 10 gr/day of alcohol. [8-9]

Non-Modifiable Risk Factors:

Hereditary CRC syndromes: Most of them are inherited autosomal dominant and are associated with high risk of CRC (Familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome) [10].

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: These are 1% of CRC, with CRC occurring in 90% before the age of 45 years and is caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. [11]

MUTYH-associated polyposis: Associated with a mutation of the base excision repair gene (MUTYH) of autosomal recessive inheritance, typically more than 15 and less than 100 adenomas are present, with late onset between 40 - 50 years with no descriptions of early cases. [12]

Lych syndrome: It is more frequent than familial adenomatous polyposis, and represents 3% of colon adenocarcinomas, also called hereditary non-polyposis CRC, it is due to pathogenic variants of some genes involved in the repair of errors in DNA replication. [13]

Ulcerative Colitis: Pancolitis confers a five to fifteen-fold increased risk of CRC compared to the average risk, and the incidence begins to increase as the duration of disease exceeds 10 to 20 years. [14]

Abdominopelvic Radiation: Survivors of cancer received in childhood or adulthood have an increased risk of gastrointestinal neoplasms, most of which are CRC, it is suggested that follow-up in these patients should be at five years after completion of radiation therapy or at 30 years of age. [8]

Colorectal Cancer Screening:

CRC cancer is a preventable disease in those over 45 years of age, based on screening plans, the main risk factor which is unmodifiable is age, in those over 50 years of age. [15]

When detected in early stages, the overall survival rate is 90%. There are fecal tests such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with a sensitivity of 81% compared to the sensitivity of guaiac fecal occult blood in stool on three occasions (gFOBT), which reaches 61%. [15-16]

The sensitivity for detecting colorectal adenomas was 96% for FIT and 97% for gFOBT [15]

Currently, stool DNA testing is a relatively new method for detecting mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene.

The guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT):

Three consecutive stool samples should be taken annually, but patients should be instructed to avoid taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), red meat consumption during the three days prior to the test, and vitamin C intake should also be avoided as this can lead to false positives. [17]

Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT): 

This functional test uses antibodies against hemoglobin to detect occult blood in feces, so it does not require dietary restrictions since it only detects human blood and at the colorectal level, so it has fewer false positive results in endemic populations with Helicobacter pylori. [18]

Fecal DNA Test: 

This test is multipurpose, since it not only detects human blood in stool, but also certain genetic mutations in the DNA of large adenoma cells and colorectal cancer cells.

 

Target Population

Sensitivity / Specificity

Cost

gFOBT

Average Risk

30-70%  / 97 %

5- 23 US

FIT

Average Risk / High Risk

76%  / 95%

22 – 24 US

Fecal DNA Test  

 

Average Risk

55 - 88% / 94 %

150 US

Patel SS, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies. Cancer Control. 2015;22(2):248-258 Tomado y modificado de: Patel SS, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies. Cancer Control. 2015;22(2):248-258

Image Tests:

Colonoscopy:

It is an efficient test when it is directed to the appropriate population and meets the quality criteria being the cannulation of the cecum and withdrawal minimum 7 - 9 minutes.

The error rate in colorectal cancer detection is between 0.2 - 5%. [19]

Flexible Sigmoidoscopy:

It has been shown to reduce mortality in colorectal cancer by 18 - 23% since it can also observe the mucosa and remove the polyps visible there, in combination with stool tests. [19-20]

It usually has very low complications and may not require sedation for its performance.

Tomography (CT) Colonography:

It is a minimally invasive option, requires a CT scan and 3D reconstruction, is less invasive than endoscopic procedures and does not require recovery time.

It can detect polyps larger than 10 mm and other abnormal findings should be carried colonoscopy studies. [21]

 

Target Population

Sensitivity / Specificity

Cost

Colonoscopy

High Risk

95% / 100 %

161 – 1218 US

Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

 

Average Risk

60 – 95 % / 90%

161 – 224 US

CT Colonography

 

Average Risk

80 – 95 % / 90%

540 – 900 US

Patel SS, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies. Cancer Control. 2015;22(2):248-258 Tomado y modificado de: Patel SS, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies. Cancer Control. 2015;22(2):248-25

1. Colorectal Cancer Screening Algorithm:

* Article Authors

Colorectal Cancer:

Early Stage:

Resection of colon or rectal polyps in long-term repeat surveillance programs may lead to detection of malignant polyps or advanced asymptomatic high-risk asymptomatic adenomas. Localized disease is limited to the submucosal or muscularis propria (Stage 1). [22]

Early stage is defined as completely resected disease which has no underlying organ or lymph node involvement, staging criteria for colorectal cancer are established by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).

Definition

T Stage

Tx

No information about local tumour infiltration available

Tis

Tumour restricted to mucosa, no infiltration of lamina muscularis mucosae

T1

Infiltration through lamina muscularis mucosae into submucosa, no infiltration of lamina muscularis propria

T2

Infiltration into, but not beyond, lamina muscularis propria

T3

Infiltration into subserosa or non-peritonealised pericolic or perirectal tissue, or both; no infiltration of serosa or neighbouring organs

T4a

Infiltration of the serosa

T4b

Infiltration of neighbouring tissues or organs

N Stage

Nx

No information about lymph node involvement available

N0

No lymph node involvement

N1a

Cancer cells detectable in 1 regional lymph node

N1b

Cancer cells detectable in 2–3 regional lymph nodes

N1c

Tumour satellites in subserosa or pericolicor perirectal fat tissue, regional lymph nodes not involved

N2a

Cancer cells detectable in 4–6 regional lymph nodes

N2b

Cancer cells detectable in 7 or greater regional lymph nodes

M Stage

Mx

No information about distant metastases available

M0

No distant metastases detectable

M1a

Metastasis to 1 distant organ or distant lymph nodes

M1b

Metastasis to more than 1 distant organ or set of distant lymph nodes or peritoneal metastasis

Classification of colorectal cancers according to local invasion depth (T stage), lymph node involvement (N stage), and presence of distant metastases (M stage)

Table 3: Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

Rectal endoscopic ultrasound:

comprehensively evaluates the rectal wall layers and T staging and defines the treatment of tumors, tumors located at T1 are suitable for endoscopic surgery [24].

2. Non-metastatic Colon Cancer Follow-Up Algorithm:

* Article Authors

Surgical management of primary colon cancers without systemic involvement is mostly treated by surgical management with complete intestinal and mesocolic resection together with ligation of arteries and veins as close as possible to the vascular trunk, thus improving survival. [24-25]

It is known that surgical resection allows an excellent oncologic outcome with a 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 91.4% in stage II and 70.2% in stage III. [26]

3. Non-metastatic Rectal Cancer Follow-up Algorithm:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Article Authors

Rectal cancers can be divided into four groups: very early (some T1), early (T1-2), intermediate (most T3) and locally advanced (most T4), but important factors other than T stage, such as distance from the anal verge, circumferential margin, nodal stage, vascular and nerve invasion, are also relevant for cancer staging.[26]

Methods of resection include local procedures such as polypectomy, mucosal excision or submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. More invasive procedures include transabdominal resection, low anterior resection, proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis, abdominoperineal resection. [25-26]

Cure of disease:

The possibility of early diagnosis of cancer has led to a great reduction in the risk of cancer-related death, the term cured refers to complete clinical remission of the cancer. Long-term survivors of colon carcinoma account for 9.5% and rank third among all cancers.

4. Post-operative follow-up algorithm for colon and rectal cancer
*
Article Authors

 

References

  1. Henley SJ, Ward EM, Scott S, et al. Informe anual a la nación sobre el estado del cáncer, parte I: Estadísticas nacionales de cáncer. Cáncer 2020; 126: 2225.
  2. Ward EM, Sherman RL, Henley SJ y col. Informe anual a la nación sobre la situación del cáncer, con cáncer en hombres y mujeres de 20 a 49 años. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111: 1279.
  3. Fedewa SA, Flanders WD, Ward KC, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166:857.
  4. Cuenta de Alto Costo. Situación del cáncer en la población adulta atendida en el SGSS de Colombia. 2019.
  5. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 00247 de 2014. 3 de febrero.pdf [Internet].2014.Disponibleen:https://www.cancer.gov.co/images/pdf/NORMATIVA/RESOLUCIONES/RESOLU CI%C3%93N_000247_DE_2014.pdf
  6. Flores D. Envejecimiento y cáncer. Rev Clínica la Esc Med UCR – HSJD [Internet]. 2017. Disponible en: www.revistaclinicahsjd.ucr.ac.cr
  7. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 7.
  8. Doubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Major JM, et al. Socioeconomic status and the risk of colorectal cancer: an analysis of more than a half million adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer 2012; 118:3636.
  9. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:524.
  10. Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18:1688.
  11. Lee BY, Sonnenberg A. Time trends of mortality from colorectal cancer in the United States: a birth-cohort analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:1148.
  12. Burt RW, DiSario JA, Cannon-Albright L. Genetics of colon cancer: impact of inheritance on colon cancer risk. Annu Rev Med 1995; 46:371
  13. Win AK, Dowty JG, Cleary SP, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of mutations in MUTYH, with and without a family history of cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 146:1208.
  14. Jones S, Emmerson P, Maynard j, Best jM, jordan S, Williams GT, et al. Biallelic germline mutations in MYH predispose to multiple colorectal adenoma and somatic G:C-->T:A mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2961-7.
  15. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, Bacchus CM, Dunfield L, et al. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ 2016;188:340.
  16. Wilt TJ, Harris RP, Qaseem A, High Value Care Task Force of the American College of Physicians. Screening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:718.
  17. Colorectal cancer screening for averageā€risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.
  18. Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:18.
  19. Ziogas A, Horick NK, Kinney AY, et al. Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time. JAMA 2011; 306:172.
  20. Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:458.
  21. Ko CW, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:1163.
  22. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS): Clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer (2020)
  23. ASCO: Clinical practice guideline on duration of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy of stage III colon cancer (2019)
  24. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO): Guideline on endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer (2019)
  25. Choosing Wisely: Don't perform routine PET-CT in the initial staging of localized colon or rectal cancer or as part of routine surveillance for patients who have been curatively treated for colon or rectal cancer (2019)
  26. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR): Guidelines for the treatment of colorectal cancer, 2019