Study of The Dynamics and Evolution of Fibrillation in the Human Heart by the Classical Soliton Model

Authors

Sergey Belyakin1,*, Sergey Shuteev 1,2
1Department of General Physics, Physics Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
2Laboratory of dynamic systems, Physics Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
*Corresponding author: Sergey Belyakin, Department of General Physics, Physics Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Article Information

*Corresponding author: Sergey Belyakin, Department of General Physics, Physics Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Received: February 06, 2021
Accepted: February 18, 2021
Published: February 24, 2021

Citation:  Belyakin S, Shuteev S. (2021) Impact of Inflammation on Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Cardiology Interventions, 2(1); DOI: http;//doi.org/03.2021/1.1006
Copyright: ©2021 Sergey Belyakin, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this publication, we consider the classical soliton model, which describes the heart tissue as an active conducting system, taking into account its self-oscillating properties; in the model, heart rhythms can be described on the basis of the theory of dynamical systems to justify the need to build a universal model of the oscillatory medium. This model contributes to the understanding of cardiac pathologies such as tachycardia and fibrillation. These studies are based on representations of continuous time (time and continuous phase portraits). In this publication, we will consider in detail the main stages of the development of the evolution of fibrillation under external force [1,2].


Keywords: nonlinear dynamic system; cylindrical shock waves; soliton; passive dispersed media; active relaxation media. 

1. Introduction

In a healthy heart, refractoriness provides a normal sequence of propagation of excitation into the heart and electrical stability of the myocardium. Since the area of the myocardium through which the excitation passes becomes unresponsive for some time, re-entry of the excitation into this area is impossible. Due to this, the counter waves in the myocardium mutually "extinguish" each other, which prevents, in particular, the appearance of unwanted circulation of excitation. However, in the final stage of each excitation cycle, the myocardium becomes inhomogeneous in refractoriness for a short time and loses electrical stability. Stimulus, acting at this time, can lead to serious violations of the normal course of excitation, in particular to the emergence of circulating excitation waves by the mechanism of "re-entry" (re-entry) [3,4].

Figure 1: Stable spiral wave when the APD recovery curve is flat. Electrical recovery and stability of a spiral wave in a homogeneous two-dimensional tissue. A – the restoration curve of APD is flat, induced reentry (spiral waves) is stable and corresponds to monomorphic tachycardia. B – recovery curve APD steep (steep).

Sharp violations of the normal ratio of excitability and refractoriness can lead to the formation of a large number of re-entrant waves in the myocardium, which are spiral waves (Fig.1) on the surface of the heart and complete desynchronization and discoordination of the activity of the myocardial fibers when they begin to excite and contract independently. This condition is called fibrillation and is accompanied by almost complete loss of pumping function of the corresponding part of the heart. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is an extreme form of cardiac arrhythmias and the predominant cause of sudden death (due to circulatory arrest) among patients with CVD. Therefore, this pathology is studied particularly intensively. However, there is still no consensus on the mechanism supporting the FF. In one case, it is believed that the LF is due to a single rapidly rotating wave, or the mother rotor, which can be both stationary and wandering, and in interaction with the inhomogeneities of the heart tissue can initiate secondary turbulent activity [5]. In another case, it is assumed that a complex pattern of excitation during LF is formed by multiple re-entrant waves. These two options do not exclude each other, and recent studies have shown that in isolated rabbit hearts, both types of LF can exist [5]. In the dissertation work we adhere to the widespread hypothesis about the presence of multiple rotors during fibrillation in large hearts [6], for example, a person may have about ~ 15 of them. The theory of dynamic systems describes many processes inherent in active media, including some types of arrhythmias [7]. Since arrhythmias are caused by certain disorders in the heart muscle and, therefore, are pathological conditions, the modeling of such systems is of great practical interest and can bring closer to solving the problem of the possibility of controlling their behavior through external influences. This, in turn, allows us to come close to the problem of soft withdrawal of active systems from the state of developed space–time chaos that characterizes some types of pathologies [8,9].

2. The mathematical dynamic model of the soliton

The mathematical dynamic model of the soliton is represented by the equation (1).

Time portraits of the system (1) are shown in Fig.(2–4), active relaxation media:                                                                             

       a =1.0, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b = –2.0, k = 0.045, ω = 64π.

Figure 2: Time portraits of the system (1) at : x0 = 0.4, y0 = 0.4, z0 = 2.5, t = (0→ 25).

Figure 3: Time portraits of the system (1) at : x0 = 0.4, y0 = 0.4, z0 = 2.5, t = (100→ 125).

Figure 4: Time portraits of the system (1) at : x0 = 0.4, y0 = 0.4, z0 = 2.5, t = (500→ 525).

Where:  z – the classical soliton equation,  (x,y) determine the chirality of the system, (a,b) – initial amplitudes of stimulation, k – minimum internal potential, a1,a2,a3 internal state (dispersion), ωangular spiral frequency.

3. The classical soliton model of the normal state of the heart rhythm in the absence of fibrillation

Time portraits of the system (1) are shown in Fig.(5), active relaxation media:                                                                              

         a =±1.0, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b =±2.0, k = 0.045, ω = 64π.

Figure 5: Time portraits of the system (1) at : x0 = 0.4, y0 = 0.4, z0 = 2.5, t = (–3→ 3).

4. Classical soliton model heart failure rhythm presence of fibrillation

Time portraits of the system (1) are shown in Fig.(6), passive dispersed media:                                                                             

         a =±0.09, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b =±0.09, k = 0.045, ω = 64π.

Figure 6: Time portraits of the system (1) at: x0 = 0.09, y0 = 0.09, z0 = 0.09, t = (–70→ 70).

5. The classical model of the soliton is heart failure of the rhythm, the presence of fibrillation under external force
Time portraits of the system (1) are shown in Fig.(7,8), passive dispersed media under external forcea =±0.09, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b =±0.09, k = 0.045, ω = 64π.

Figure 7: Time portraits of the system (1) at: x0 = y0 = z0  → (0.09, 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0).

Figure 8: Time portraits of the system (1) at: x0 = y0 = z0 → (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0).

4. Result

The mathematical dynamic model of the soliton is represented by equation (1) for  a =1.0, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b = –2.0, k = 0.045, ω = 64π and describes the active relaxation state. At  t = (0→ 250), a cylindrical shock wave forms the leading edge of the wave (fig. 2,3). At t = (300→ 500), the cylindrical shock wave is formed into a classical frontal wave (fig. 4). The mathematical dynamic model of the soliton is represented by equation (1) for  a = ±1.0, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b = ±2.0, k = 0.045, ω = 64π and active relaxation media. At  t = (–3→ 3), a cylindrical shock wave forms the back front of the wave (fig. 5). The mathematical dynamic model of the soliton is represented by equation (1) for  a = ±0.09, a1 = 0.2, a2 = 0.1, a3 = 1.0, b = ±0.09, k = 0.045, ω = 64π and passive dispersed media. At  t = (–70→ 70), a this condition corresponds to fibrillation and is shown in the (fig. 6). The fig. (7,8) show the suppression of fibrillation. When this condition occurs (x0 = y0 = z0 = 1.0 ), the stabilization of the rhythm. Under this condition (x0 = y0 = z0 = 1.5 ), a soliton is formed that stabilizes the rhythm. Under this condition (x0 = y0 = z0 = 3.0 ), bifurcation and destabilization of the rhythm occurs. Under this condition (x0 = y0 = z0 = 7.0 ), instability and destruction of the rhythm occurs. From this it follows that to suppress fibrillation, you can not use a defibrillator, since its force effect is in the hundreds, and a stun gun in 1000, which is categorically unacceptable.

Summary:

A modified nonlinear fibrillation model based on the classical model of a twisting spiral and two coupled classical solitons is developed. .This system of equations (1) can be useful for studying and predicting the behavior of processes in a homogeneous medium, dispersion, and active medium (human atrial tissue) [10-18].

References

  1. Magazov F.G., Shestakovskaya E.S., (2017). Focusing of cylindrically shock in gas. "Bulletin of South Ural State University Series " Mathematical Modelling, Programming & Computer Software". Chelyabinsk: v.10, №4, P.46 – 55. 
  2. Kovalev Y.M., Shestakovskaya E.S., (2013). Numerical analysis of cylindrical shock waves in heterogeneous environments. "Bulletin of South Ural State University Series "Computer Technologies, Automatic Control, Radio Electronics". Chelyabinsk: v.13, №3, P.102 – 108.
  3. Wagner C.D., Persson P.B. (1998). Chaos in the cardiovascular system: An update. // Cardiovasc. Res. V.40. Pp.257-264.
  4. Goldberger A.L. (1990). Nonlinear dynamics, fractals and chaos: Applications to cardiac electrophysiology. Ann. Biomed. Eng. V.18. Pp.195-198.
  5. Clayton R., Zhuchkova E., Panfilov A. (2006). Phase singularities and filaments: Simplifying complexity in computational models of ventricular fibrillation. // Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.V.90. Pp.378-398.
  6. Jalife J., Gray R.A., Morley G.E., Davidenko J.M. (1998). Self-organization and the dynamical nature of ventricular fibrillation. // Chaos. V.8. Pp.79-93.
  7. Beuter A., Glass L., Mackey M.C., Titcombe M.S.// Nonlinear Dynamics in Physiology and Medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc. 2003.
  8. Witkowski F.X., Penkoske P.A., Plonsey R., Kaplan D.T., Spano M.L., Ditto W.L., Kavanagh K.M. (1995). Development of a nonlinearly deterministic signal generator for real time chaos control testing. // Eng. in Medicine and Biology Soc. IEEE 17-th Ann. Conf. V.1. Pp.287-288.
  9. Garfinkel A., Spano M.L., Ditto W.L. (1992). Controlling cardiac chaos. // Science. V.257. Pp.1230-1235.
  10. Christoph Kuhn, Fiorenzo Angehrn, Ortrud Sonnabend, Axel Voss, (2008). Impact of extracorporeal shock waves on the human skin with cellulite: A case study of an unique instance. " Clinical Interventions in Aging ", Switzerland: v. 3, №1, P. 201– 210.          
  11. Guiting lin, (2013).  Low-intensity shock wave therapy and its application to erectile dysfunction."WorldJMensHealth",California:v.31,3,P.208 –214.      
  12. Peng Y.Z., Zheng K., (2015). Shock wave treatment enhances endothelial proliferation via autocrine vascular endothelial growth factor. " Genetics and Molecular Research ", Yunnan:v. 14, №4, P. 19203 – 19210.  
  13. Jonh O. Prior, Hoshang Farhad, Oliver Muller, (2014). Multimodality imaging in ischemic cardiomyopathy. " Curr cardiovasc rep " Cardiac nuclear imaging (A Cuocolo, Section editor ) ",Springer: v. 7, №9285, P. 1 – 10.                                                                                        
  14. Sofia Mariotto, Ernesto Amelio, Ernst Marlinghaus, (2009). Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: Molecular mechanism that triggers anti- inflammatory action. " Current medicinal chemistry ",  Verona: №16, P. 2366 – 2372.    
  15. Reinhold Zimmermann, Gunter Janetschek, (2009). Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the theatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: A Randomised, double-blind, placedo-controlledstudy."Europeanurology",Linz:56, P. 418 – 424.                                        
  16. Megha Presad, Andrew Cassar, Amir Lerman, (2015). Extracorporeal shock wave myocardial therapy is efficacious in improving symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris - a multicenter study. " Coronary artery disease ", Maryland: v. 26, №3, P. 194 – 200.                         
  17. Yoshitaka Ito, Kenta Ito, Takashi Shiroto, (2010). Cardiac shock wave therapy ameliorates left ventricular remodeling after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in pigs in vivo. " Coronary artery disease ", Sendai: v. 21, №5, P. 304 – 311.                                                          
  18. Slikkerveer J., de Boer K., van Rossum A.C., Kamp O., (2016). Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for refractory angina pectoris with quantitative analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a short communication. " Neth heart J "( Original article - design study article)", Amsterdam: v. 24, №8, P. 319 – 325.