Buttock Wounds, and Sacral Fracture with Normal Radiolodic Procedure Due to Stab Wound in a Covoid 19 Positive Patient: A Case Report

Authors

Ahmad Reza Shahraki 1*, Reza Abaee2 and Elham Shahraki3

1General surgeon, Assistant professor, Department of surgery, Zahedan medical faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services,Zahedan, Iran.
2General Physician, Medical Faculty , Tehran, Iran.
3Associated professor of nephrology, Department of Internal medicine, Nephrologist, Ali Ibne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of medical    Sciences, Zahedan , I.R. Iran.

 

Article Information

*Corresponding Author: Ahmad Reza Shahraki, General surgeon, Assistant professor, Department of surgery, Zahedan medical faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services,Zahedan, Iran.

Received Date: January 16, 2024
Accepted Date: January 24, 2024
Published Date: January 26, 2024

Citation: Ahmad Reza Shahraki, Reza Abaee and Elham Shahraki. (2024) “Buttock wounds, and sacral fracture with normal radiolodic procedure due to stab wound in a Covoid 19 positive patient: A case report.”, International Journal of Medical Case Reports and Medical Research, 2(1); DOI: 10.61148/2994-6905/IJMCRMR/021.
Copyright: © 2024. Ahmad Reza Shahraki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The sacrum bone is an integral part of the spinal col­umn and pelvic ring. The Iumbosacral neurologic func­tion is protected by the sacrum and it maintains spinal column and pelvic alignment. For this reason, injuries to the sacrum may result in deformity, chronic pain and loss of lower extremity, bowel, bladder and sexual func­tion. Therefore, the treatment of sacral fractures requires optimizing both neurologic and structural outcome, while also implicating a comprehensive understanding of neural decompression and skeletal reconstruction techniques.

The majority of sacral fractures occur in combination with pelvic fractures and the rest of them, representing only a small percent, occur either isolated or in com­bination of noncontiguous Thoracolumbar fractures. Our case was a 22 years old male with positive PCR test for covoid 19 that referred to surgery part because of stab wound on his buttock. Treatment of sacral fractures should always take into consideration associated systemic or musculoskeletal injuries, osteoporosis, the presence of brain injury, obesity, the patient’s physiological age, and past medical history. Aggressive surgical treatment may lead to surgical blood loss and hemodynamic instability, cardiopulmonary compromise, soft tissue break down, and an increased infection risk in the metabolically challenged patient. Only a multidisciplinary approach between the trauma team and subspecialists will dictate the most appropriate management for these patients, and recent data has shown that best outcomes are obtained when these fractures are cared for at level 1 trauma centers.


Keywords: sacral fractures; diagnosis; management; buttock; covoid19

Background:
The sacrum bone is an integral part of the spinal col­umn and pelvic ring. The lumbosacral neurologic func­tion is protected by the sacrum and it maintains spinal column and pelvic alignment. For this reason, injuries to the sacrum may result in deformity, chronic pain and loss of lower extremity, bowel, bladder and sexual func­tion. Therefore, the treatment of sacral fractures requires optimizing both neurologic and structural outcome, while also implicating a comprehensive understanding of neural decompression and skeletal reconstruction techniques [1].

The severity of sacral fracture varies from insufficiency fracture in osteoporotic patients, to com­plex fracture pattern, resulted from high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accident or fall from height [1,2,3,4,5,6].

The majority of sacral fractures occur in combination with pelvic fractures and the rest of them, representing only a small percent, occur either isolated or in com­bination of noncontiguous thoracolumbar fractures. The incidence of sacral fracture, accompanied by pelvic fracture, ranges from 40% to 50% [1, 6,7,8,9,10].  Because of the close relationship of the sacrum and neurologic function of lower extremity and bowel, bladder and sexual func­tion, diagnosis and treatment of sacral fracture is very important and is very challenging [6].

According to the literature, sacral fractures, in 30% of patients with neu­rologic deficit and in 50% of patients with normal neuro­logic examination, had been missed [5,6,8,9].

Therefore, comprehensive history taking and physical examination, in combination with using diagnostic modalities and high index of suspicion of physician are mandatory for the prevention of complications, which may accompany sacral fracture, in trauma patients [5]. Behind every stab wound is a new world must be discover and explore.

Case presentation:

Our case was a 22 years old male with positive PCR test for Covoid 19 that referred to surgery part because of stab wound on his buttock

2e75162d-4775-451e-ad9b-24d485898133.JPG 
Figure1: Stab wound on buttock.

CT and graphics show normal internal organs and integrated.

sacral bone. We prepare patient for surgery that announce us that his PCR test for cocoid19 is positive, but we start the surgery.

9a02818c-8ff0-4251-a8d3-208bd8402ae9.JPG

Figure 2: Exposure of injury.

We saw that with no evidence of neurologic signs his sacral bone fractured vertically.

6759acac-1e49-4293-af51-3dc2a12de19d.JPG

Figure 3: Exposure of rectum.

We repair sacral with wire and covered rectum with a soft tissue flap and repair the laceration and start treatment of covoid19. After 1 months he can stand on his feet and walk with walker and we discharge him to continue physiotherapy.

Conclusion:
Sacral fractures are poorly recognized, because of dif­ficulty in radiological evaluation and combined severe injuries, associated with these fractures [11]. The ideal treatment of sacral fracture remains unknown [7,12] Earlier studies demonstrated reasonable out­comes, with either non-operative or surgical methods. However, over the last 20 years, no constant treatment algorithm for these severe injuries has been introduced [7]. Penetrating trauma refers an injury to the soft tissues, muscle vessels, nerves, and organs in the penetrated area. It is an open injury with entrance and exit sites, usually accompanied by wounds to 1 or more tissues and organs. Because of the presence of complex anatomical structures in the injured area and the occurrence of random injuries, treatment and surgical procedures are difficult. [13].

The preoperative evaluation and imaging are crucial for dealing with penetrating wounds to the buttock. If there is no injury to large blood vessels, intestines, or the urinary system, satisfactory results can be obtained with the application surgery. [14]

Treatment of sacral fractures should always take into consideration associated systemic or musculoskeletal injuries, osteoporosis, the presence of brain injury, obesity, the patient’s physiological age, and past medical history. Aggressive surgical treatment may lead to surgical blood loss and hemodynamic instability, cardiopulmonary compromise, soft tissue breaks down, and an increased infection risk in the metabolically challenged patient. Only a multidisciplinary approach between the trauma team and subspecialists will dictate the most appropriate management for these patients, and recent data has shown that best outcomes are obtained when these fractures are cared for at level 1 trauma centers [15]. In conclusion, sacral fractures are complex and frequently overlooked [16]. Penetrating injuries to the buttock area should be treated as potentially life threatening. Algorithms exist to aid decision making and should be made available to clinicians.

►► A high index of suspicion for subtle findings should be

applied when examining radiological images for patients with

penetrating buttock trauma. The involvement of a vascular

radiologist is advised.

►► Patients re-presenting to hospital with ongoing bleeding from

buttock stab wounds should be considered for an urgent

digital subtraction angiogram with the view of embolisation [17].

Declarations:

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate:

The content of this manuscript is in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki for Ethics. No committee approval was required. Oral and written consent to participate was granted by families.

Consent for publication

“Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.”
Availability of supporting data

It is available.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests and nothing to disclose.

Funding: There is no funding.

Authors' contributions:

Ahmad Reza Shahraki is a surgeon of patient and writes this paper. Reza Abaee collects data and Elham Shahraki reviews the paper.

The author declares that they have no competing financial interests and nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Only a multidisciplinary approach between the trauma team and subspecialists will dictate the most appropriate management for these patients, and recent data has shown that best outcomes are obtained when these fractures are cared for at level 1 trauma centers.

References

  1. Starantzis KA, Mirzashahi B, Behrbalk E, Sadat M, Shafafy M. Open reduction and posterior instrumentation of type 3 high trans­verse sacral fracture-dislocation: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(2):286–91.
  2. Totterman A, Glott T, Soberg HL, Madsen JE, Roise O. Pelvic trau­ma with displaced sacral fractures: functional outcome at one year. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(13):1437–43.
  3. Totterman A, Glott T, Madsen JE, Roise O. Unstable sacral frac­tures: associated injuries and morbidity at 1 year. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18): E628–35.
  4. Lindahl J, Makinen TJ, Koskinen SK, Soderlund T. Factors associ­ated with outcome of spinopelvic dissociation treated with lum­bopelvic fixation. Injury. 2014;45(12):1914–20.
  5. Dalbayrak S, Yaman O, Ayten M, Yilmaz M, Ozer AF. Surgical treat­ment in sacral fractures and traumatic spinopelvic instabilities. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(4):498–505.
  6. Bydon M, Fredrickson V, De la Garza-Ramos R, Li Y, Lehman RJ, Trost GR, et al. Sacral fractures. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1): eE12.
  7. Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR. Com­plications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(11 Suppl):S80–8.
  8. Dowling T, Epstein JA, Epstein NE. S1-S2 sacral fracture involving neural elements of the cauda equina. A case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(9):851–3.
  9. Fisher RG. Sacral fracture with compression of cauda equina: surgical treatment. J Trauma. 1988;28(12):1678–80.
  10. He S, Zhang H, Zhao Q, He B, Guo H, Hao D. Posterior approach in treating sacral fracture combined with lumbopelvic dissocia­tion. Orthopedics. 2014;37(11): e1027–32.
  11. Babak Mirzashahi,1, * Mahmoud Farzan,1 Mirmostafa Sadat,2 Mohamad Zarei,1 and Parviz. Habibollahzade2.  Surgical Treatment of Sacral Fractures: A Case Series Study.  J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2015 September; 1(1): e2061
  12. Bederman SS, Hassan JM, Shah KN, Kiester PD, Bhatia NN, Zamo­rano DP. Fixation techniques for complex traumatic trans­verse sacral fractures: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(16): E1028–40.
  13. Zhang M, He Q, Wang Y, et al. Combined penetrating trauma of the head, neck, chest, abdomen and scrotum caused by falling from a high altitude: a case report and literature review. Int Emerg Nurs 2019; 44: 1–7.
  14.  
  15. Zhi-Sheng Long1, Xiao-Yang Nie1 and Yuan-Wei Zhang1,2. Treatment of penetrating trauma to the buttock assisted by spinal endoscopy. Journal of International Medical Research 48(1) 1–7 ! The Author(s) 2019.
  16. Morshed S, Knops S, Jurkovich GJ, Wang J, MacKenzie E, Rivara FP. The impact of trauma-center care on mortality and function following pelvic ring and acetabular injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97:265-272.
  17. Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto, MD, PhD, FEBOT1, Mark F. Kurd, MD2, Gregory D. Schroeder, MD2, Christopher K. Kepler, MD, MBA2, James C. Krieg, MD2, Jo¨ rg H. Holstein, MD, PhD3, Carlo Bellabarba, MD4, Reza Firoozabadi, MD4, F. Cumhur Oner, MD, PhD5, Frank Kandziora, MD, PhD6, Marcel F. Dvorak, MD7, Conor P. Kleweno, MD8, Luiz R. Vialle, MD, PhD9, S. Rajasekaran, MD, PhD10, Klause J. Schnake, MD11, and Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD, PhD, MBA. Sacral Fractures and Associated Injuries. Global Spine Journal 2017, Vol. 7(7) 609-616 ھ The Author(s) 2017.
  18. Stephanie Clark,1 Suzanne Westley,1 Alexander Coupland,1 Mohamad Hamady,2 Alun H Davies1. Buttock wounds: beware what lies beneath. Clark S, et al. BMJ Case Rep 2017.