Environmental and Human Behavioral Factors associated with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Single and Married Women in Eket

Authors

Ekom Ndifreke Edem 1*, Emem Okon Mbong 2 Udeme Olayinka Olaniyan 3
1
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria
2 Department of Environmental Biology, Heritage Polytechnic, Ikot Udoata, Eket, Nigeria
3 Department of Environmental Health, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

Article Information

*Corresponding authors: Ekom Ndifreke Edem, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria.

Received: April 22, 2021
Accepted:  April 30, 2021
Published: May 05, 2021

Citation: Ekom N Edem, Emem O Mbong Udeme O Olaniyan, (2021) Environmental and Human Behavioral Factors associated with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Single and Married Women in Eket”. International Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health Research, 1(2); DOI: http;//doi.org/03.2021/1.1010.
Copyright: © 2021 Ekom Ndifreke Edem. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) is caused by the overgrowth of yeasts, mainly Candida albicans. Their prevalence is consequent on some known environmental and human behaviors including; intercourse frequency, menstrual protection methods, direction of vaginal wiping after sex, toilet type, toilet paper used, recent antibiotic use, underwear fabric, tight clothing and birth control methods. These behaviors are often neglected. The current study examines these factors and their relationship with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Single and Married Women attending Heritage Polytechnic Health Centre, Eket. The prevalence of VVC was 63.3% with occurrence rate of VVC among married, single, pregnant and 20-34 age group, as 31.9%, 31.4%, 40.4% and 53.1%, respectively. The occurrence of VVC was positively associated with menstrual protection methods, direction of vaginal wiping after sex, toilet type, toilet paper used, recent antibiotic use, underwear fabric, birth control methods and tight clothing. There was no significant association between VVC and intercourse frequency among singles. Risk factor like toilet users, had no association with VVC among singles but had some level of association (p<0.05) among the married. In conclusion, the high prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among women with genital infections shows there is a need for training of health laboratory workers in antenatal, STD, outpatient and family planning clinics on pH determination in order to improve the early detection of an alteration around the vaginal environment which may lead to VVC.


Keywords: candidiasis; discharge; antibiotic; environmental; behavioral

Introduction

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) is a fungal infection caused by genus candida, predominantly with Candida albicans which are essentially part of the vaginal flora. Candida albican usually appears as oval yeast-like cell that reproduce by budding in infected areas (Van Schalkwyk and Yudin, 2015). Filamentous hyphae and pseudohyphae consist of elongated yeast cells that remain attached to each other. A few decades ago vulvovaginal candidiasis was not considered a very commonly occurring disease; however with the rise in the number of immunocompromised patients over the last two decades, vulvovaginal candidiasis has become much more common (Namkinga et al., 2005). Vulvovaginal candidiasis is seen mostly frequently in women with diabetes mellitus or following prolonged antibiotic therapy (Abdul-Aziz et al., 2019). The prominent symptom is a yellow milk vaginal discharge yeast cells and other symptoms of VVC include itching, pain, and swelling. In addition, the typical vaginal discharge in VVC is described as cottage cheese-like in character (Paladine and Desai, 2018). It has been suggested that 75.0% of women may experience VVC during their lifetimes (Achkar and Fries, 2010).

Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis are factors that do not seem to be a direct cause of the disease, but seem to be associated in some way. Having a risk factor for VVC makes the chances of getting a condition higher but does not always lead to vulvovaginal candidiasis. Also, the absence of any risk factor or having a protective factor does not necessarily guard one against getting vaginal candidiasis (Sobel et al., 1998).

Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis are numerous; amongst them include pregnancy, poorly controlled diabetes, Using oral contraceptives, excessive antibiotics, douches, perfumed feminine hygiene spray, tight underwear, topical antimicrobial agents. In addition to those women with immune suppressive condition, and those with thyroid disorders and those on corticosteroids (John, 2000).

Vulvovaginal candidiasis, a common, irritating and frequently recurring infection, few studies have examined the risk factors associated with candidiasis factors in a systematic fashion (Foxman, 1990). In this study, the relationships between personal habits, behaviors, and vulvovaginal candidiasis by analyzing a subset of data from a Health Service-based case-control study of urinary tract infection was explored. Many genital infections are related to sexual contact with infected partners.

This work seeks to determine the prevalence of candidiasis among singles and married women of different age groups with the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates in Eket metropolis.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among singles and married women seeking healthcare services in Heritage Polytechnic Health center in Eket, in the period from February to April 2020. Three hundred and sixty High Vaginal Swab (HVS) were collected, One hundred and eighty each from singles and married women respectively. Eligibility for the study was sorted on basis of reproductive age, sexually active, lifestyle related behaviors, routine hygienic practices, menstrual care, history of contraceptive intake and willingness to give informed consent. They were enrolled at the time they appeared with symptoms of vulvovaginitis at the health centre. Informed consent was obtained, and each participant was given a comprehensive self-administered questionnaire to complete at the time of the visit. The questionnaire included items on risk factors for VVC, including questions on sociodemographic variables, birth control methods, sexual history and practices, clothing history, lifestyle related behaviors, routine hygienic practices, menstrual care and history of contraceptive intake etc.

The participating physician performed a pelvic examination and recorded examination data. The vagina of each woman was examined for the characteristics of vaginal discharge (color, consistency and odor). The vaginal pH was also measured by applying a pH paper to the lateral walls of the vagina.

Laboratory investigations

Endo-cervical and high vaginal swabs were collected following aseptic precautions. The samples collected were labeled appropriately, indicating the patient’s name, gender, date and time. The swabs were immediately transported to the laboratory for analysis. First, a saline mount of the vaginal discharge specimen was covered with a cover- slip, and examined microscopically at ×400 magnification as described by Cheesbrough, (2006), then the samples were inoculated into appropriate agar plates which was Sabourand Dextrose Agar and incubated for 72 hours at 30-350C for C. albicans. Colonies were identified on the basis of microscopy (Fig 1), colonial morphology and biochemical tests basically a germ tube test as described by Cheesbrough, (2006). Infection with Candida albicans was examined microscopically using a 10% KOH wet mounts followed by colony identification after cultivation on Sabouraud dextrose agar for the diagnosis of VVC (Bitew and Abebaw, 2018).

Data Analysis

All data generated during this study was subjected to statistical analysis to test for significance using ANOVA and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). The association between independent and dependent variables was tested using Pearson’s chisquare or Fisher’s exact test, whichever suitable, and the odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% CI were reported.

A Multivariable logistic regression model was developed for all variables and the adjusted OR and its corresponding 95% CI were reported. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical Consideration

The ethical committee of the Heritage Polytechnic Health Centre gave ethical clearance and permission to conduct the study. Patients’ results were handled with confidentiality and those found to be infected with classical STDs and candidiasis was treated according to the guidelines of the Ministry of Health in Nigeria.

Results

Out of the 360 HVS processed, 228 (63.3%) were seen to be VVC, 34 (9.4%) were non-Candida albican and 98 (27.2%) were other microbial agents. Married women were seen to have highest number of VVC with 115 (31.9%) while singles had 113 (31.4%) as seen in Table 1.

 

Marital status

 

No.

Candida Species

 

Other Microbial Agents

Candida albican

(VVC)

Non-Candida albican

Married

180

115 (31.9%)

21 (5.8%)

44 (12.2%)

Singles

180

113 (31.4%)

13 (3.6%)

54 (15%)

Total

360

228 (63.3%)

34 (9.4%)

98 (27.2%)

                                        Table 1: Prevalence of Candida species in relation to Marital Status

Incidence and Percentage Infection Rate

Sociodemographic characteristics

Table 2 which carries information about the Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population shows that of the total 360 population, age range 20-34 had the highest 121 (53.1%) incidence of VVC followed by >35 with 103 (45.2%). Women with advanced level of education had the highest 82 (36%) incidence of VVC while those with no formal education had the least 29 (12.7%). There was high 136 (59.6%) incidence rate of VVC among non-pregnant women while pregnant women had a low 92 (40.4%). Women residing in the urban region had a high 156 (68.4%) rate of VVC while those in rural area had a low 72 (31.6%) rate.

 

Characteristics

No.

VVC

n (%)

Age (years)

 

 

< 19

6

4 (1.8%)

20–34

215

121 (53.1%)

>35

139

103 (45.2%)

Education level

 

 

No Formal Education

38

29 (12.7%)

Primary

74

60 (26.3%)

Secondary

117

57 (25%)

Advanced

131

82 (36%)

Pregnancy status

 

 

Not Pregnant

234

136 (59.6%)

Pregnant

126

92 (40.4%)

Residence

 

 

Rural

157

72 (31.6%)

Urban

203

156 (68.4%)

 

 

 

Table 2: Sociodemographic factors with VVC among women attending the PHC centers

 

Figure 1: Chlamydospores of C.albicans

Multivariate analysis of Selected Behavioral Risk Factors

In addition to sexual behavior variables, risk factors for VVC such as recent use of antibiotics, wearing of tight clothing, toilet users, toilet type, menstrual protection, birth control methods etc were evaluated and listed in Table 3.

There was no significant association between VVC and intercourse frequency among singles. However, there was significant association (p<0.05) with some risk factors like menstrual protection methods, direction of vaginal wiping after sex, toilet type, toilet paper used, recent antibiotic use, underwear fabric, tight clothing, birth control methods among both the married and single. Risk factor like toilet users, had no association with VVC among singles but had some level of association (p<0.05) among the married. This data is shown in table 3.

 

 

Singles

Married

Variables

No.

VVC

n= 113 (%)

OR (Cl  95%)

p-value

VVC

n= 115 (%)

OR (Cl  95%)

p-value

Weekly Frequency of sexual intercourse during the past 4 weeks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

never

21

11 (3.1)

 

0.660

 -

 

 

 1-4time

132

34 (9.4)

-.986 (0.031-4.5)

0.438

45 (12.5)

Ref

Ref

 5+times

207

68 (18.9)

-.560 (0.49-6.6)

0.654

70 (19.4)

 2.077 (0.8-79.95)

 0.77

Birth control method (sexually active women only)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No method

87

29 (8.1)

 

0.050

48 (13.3)

Ref

0.005

Oral contraceptives

234

77 (21.4)

1.590 (1.0-23.2)

0.45

65 (18.0)

7.392 (27.3-96475.1)

0.000

Diaphragm

23

7 (1.9)

3.612 (2.8-488.4)

0.006

 -

27.105 (0.000-)

0.999

Other methods

16

 -

21.104 (0.000-)

0.999

2 (0.6)

4.863 (2.5-6827.7)

0.016

Wipe back to front

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

136

60 (16.7)

Ref

 

65 (18.0)

 

Ref

No

224

53 (14.7)

4.174 (6.3-673.4)

0.000

50 (13.9)

4.318 (2.6-2142.1)

0.12

Use colored toilet paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

never

115

33 (9.2)

Ref

0.001

39 (10.8)

Ref

0.001

rare

114

20 (5.6)

1.686  (1.4-20.5)

0.013

22 (6.1)

4.944 (7.8-2529.0)

0.001

frequently

61

25 (6.9)

-2.367 (0.006-1.4)

0.087

23 (6.4)

0.541 (0.8-39.5)

0.735

always

70

35 (9.7)

-3.305 (0.003-0.4)

0.008

31 (8.6)

-0.820 (0.3-7.7)

0.573

Menstrual protection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pant Liners

67

30 (8.3)

Ref

0.397

33 (9.2)

Ref

0.008

tampons

36

5 (1.4)

2.079 (0.398-160.7)

0.174

9 (2.5)

8.134 (17.4-666550.9)

0.003

Pads

257

78 (21.7)

1.344 (0.265-55.6)

0.324

73 (20.3)

7.779 (13.7-416692.2)

0.003

Underwear fabric

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

always cotton

59

17 (4.7)

Ref

0.14

20 (5.6)

Ref

0.005

synthetic only

81

33 (9.2)

3.886 (3.2-747.6)

0.005

26 (7.2)

10.976 (80.6-42403172.6)

0.001

mix of fabrics

220

63 (17.5)

0.691 (0.337-11.8)

0.446

69 (19.2)

1.602 (0.2-145.7)

0.353

Wearing tight clothing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

132

62 (17.2)

Ref

Ref

59 (16.4)

Ref

 

No

228

51 (14.2)

3.210 (3.1-199.96)

0.003

56 (15.6)

9.639 (102.1-2308127.4)

0.000

Antibiotics Use 4 weeks Prior to Study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Used

159

61 (16.9)

Ref

Ref

67 (18.6)

Ref

Ref

Not Used

201

52 (14.4)

0.857 (0.6-8.7)

0.197

48 (13.3)

3.966 (1.6-1718.1)

0.026

Toilet Type

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pit

97

32 (8.9)

Ref

Ref

25 (6.9)

Ref

Ref

Water closet

263

81 (22.5)

-2.158 (0.018-0.7)

0.022

90 (25)

-5.661 (0.000-0.1)

0.001

Toilet Users

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single user

61

18 (5)

Ref

0.097

20 (5.6)

Ref

0.007

2-3 Users

144

50 (13.9)

-2.459 (0.008-0.9)

0.85

51 (14.2)

-6.718 (0.000-0.1)

0.002

4+ Users

155

45 (12.5)

-2.447 (0.009-0.8)

0.087

44 (12.2)

-3.704 (0.01-0.6)

0.024

Table 3: Multivariate analysis for Selected Behavioral Risk Factors Associated with Candida infection of genital tract

Discussion

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) occurs frequently in women, yet the associated risk factors are poorly understood. Women with VVC receive different advises from physicians and other healthcare providers. These women tend to try varied pharmaceutical remedies and lifestyle modifications, such as medication and clothing, in an attempt to gain control over VVC. Yet data suggest the impacts of these changes are inconsistent. On this note, the current study shows that 63.3% of participants had VVC. This rate is lower than findings by Nwadioha et al., (2010) and Ekanem (2008), with 84% and 75% respectively. This study has a higher rate than studies at Michacan and Tanzania by Barbara et al., (2000) and Namkinga et al., (2005) with 46.4% and 45.7% incidence rates respectively. It was observed that married females had higher incidence of C. Albicans (31.9%), while the singles had lower incidence (31.4%). The high incidence of VVC among married women may not be unconnected with the elevated sexual activity and dwindling hygiene status of this group. Also females within this bracket tend to wear binding or tight fitting undergarments such as pantyhose, nylon panties, and tights, which increase the local temperature and humidity, all of which encourage the growth of candida species.

Of the 360 women, the majority of women were aged between 20-34 years (53.1%), of advanced level of education (36%), married (31.9%), not pregnanat (59.6%), urban residents (68.4%).

Predominance of candidiasis in the study was highest among age group 20 - 30. This age range is the most sexually active age group with highest risk of pregnancies, indulgence in family planning pills. This study suggests that age is a factor related to VVC infection and it is consistent with previous studies by Pfaller et al., (2002), Nwadioha et al., (2010) and Na et al., (2014) which suggests that incidence of Candida infection is increased with age. The high rate of VVC among married women can be explained by the high frequency of unprotected sexual intercourse and this is consistent with previous study by Abdul-Aziz et al., (2019).  Pregnancy indicates increase in hormonal influences and alteration in vaginal pH which suggests a relationship with VVC. Some studies by Sobel et al., (1998) and Omole-Ohonsi et al., (2006), suggest that pregnancy is an important risk factor for vaginitis. In this study, pregnant women with VVC constituted 40.4% of total population, and the rate is consistent with a 40% previous rate by Nwadioha et al., (2010). This low rate might be due to low rate of pregnant participants in the study. Education was also closely linked to the infection. This study suggests that education was unlikely associated with VVC infection whereas a study by Na et al., (2014) suggests that patients with higher education were unlikely to come down with VVC. The possible explanation for this outcome maybe that highly educated women is believed to had mastered the knowledge of candidal vaginitis and how to protect herself from VVC infection but are still exposed to more risk factors like tight clothing, colored tissue papers and antibiotic use.

Multivariate Analysis

Antibiotics and vaginal douching suppress normal bacterial flora and allow Candida organisms to proliferate. Antibiotic users posed a high rate (18.6% and 16.9% for married and singles respectively) of risk to VVC in the study. These rates could be due to the fact that widespread use of antibiotics contributes to an increased prevalence of Candida vaginal infection (Spinillo et al., 1999) because it suppresses the bacterial growth around the vagina thereby paving way for candida to thrive. However we did not find that antibiotic usage had an association with VVC infection. This is consistent with a study by Namkinga et al., (2005) which shows antibiotic usage not to be a factor associated with VVC.

Frequent sexual intercourse prevents the restoration of the vaginal ecosystem after a coital act and, hence, increases the likelihood of VVC infection (Vallor et al., 2001). This alters the pH of the vagina from between 4.2 and 4.7 to around 4.9 and 5.7, which discourage the growth normal flora of the vagina. Our present study shows those that had frequent sexual intercourse had a high rate of VVC. However, there was no significant association between frequent sexual intercourse and VVC. Previous study by Ekanem (2008), had revealed positive correlation between frequent sexual intercourse and the incidence of vulvoviginal candidiasis.

Other factors like wearing tight clothing; type of menstrual protection; toilet type; type of tissue paper; method of menstrual protection; birth control methods; toilet users; and underwear fabrics shows association in some variables with VVC. This shows a high level of behavioral differences between the married and single women which can lead to increased frequency of VVC.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of VVC in the present study underscores the importance for routine screening of patients with simple tests such as determination of vaginal pH and microscopy for clue cells. The results show that women are frequently and acutely victimized by candidiasis infection. It was observed that married women had the higher percentage of C.albican, more than single women due to their sexual, poor hygienic situation, both domestically and environmentally. And the government should take effective measure to create orientation in all the health sectors for both married and single women, on how to eradicate or eliminate candidiasis in order to protect health and life generally to the masses. If a woman with VVC is counseled to avoid the risks described by this analysis, evaluation of the impact of behavioral change on her infection rate should be assessed so that unnecessary curtailing of activities can be avoided. Health education interventions are recommended to raise women’s awareness of vaginitis and its prevention. In addition, regular monitoring of VVC among women, educating them on effective preventive measure should be conducted between married and unmarried women. Normal sanitary pad should be used, normal cleaning tissue should be used during and after sexual intercourse, avoidance of improper wears, and antibiotics should be taken on prescription by physician. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of VVC especially among the risk groups in order to avert the complications is highly recommended.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank women that participated in the study and the management of Heritage Polytechnic Health center, Eket, where the study was conducted for their cooperation in taking swabs and distribution of questionnaires. The authors acknowledge Idongesit Koffi for his succinct data analysis.

References

  1. Abdul-Aziz1, M., Mahdy, M. A. K., Abdul-Ghan, R., Alhilali, N.A., Al-Mujahed, L. K. A., Alabsi, S. A., Al-Shawish, F. A. M., Alsarari, N. J. M., Bamashmos, W., Abdulwali, S. J. H.,  Al Karawani, Mahdi., Almikhlafy, A. A. (2019). Bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis and trichomonal vaginitis among reproductive-aged women seeking primary healthcare in Sana’a city, Yemen. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19: 879
  2. Achkar JM, Fries BC. (2010). Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin Microbiol Rev, 23(2):253–273
  3. Akpan, A. and Morgan R. (2002). Oral candidiasis. Post Graduate Medical Journal, 78:455-459.
  4. Alexopoulous C. J., and Mims, C. W. (2002).Introductory Mycology. Pp. 272-283. New York Jonh Wiley and Sons.
  5. Barbara D. Reed., Daniel W. Gorenflo., Brenda W. Gillespie., Carl Pierson and Philip Zazove. (2000). Sexual Behaviors and Other Risk Factors for Candida Vulvovaginitis. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9: 6
  6. Bellitti, F., (Uniato, V., Nocera, E. Noviella S., and Esposito, S. (2002). Candida vulvovaginitis: an epidermiological survey among immigrat prostitutes. Infezioni in medicina 10(1): 31-36.
  7. Benjamin, D.K.Jr; Garges H; and Steinbach, W.J. (2003) Candida blood stream infection in neonates. Seminar in perinatology 27:375-383.
  8. Bitew A, Abebaw Y. (2018). Vulvovaginal candidiasis: species distribution of Candida and their antifungal susceptibility pattern. BMC Womens Health, 18 (1):94.
  9. Cheesbrough, M. (2000). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical countries, part2. Pp 137-138; 243-244. Cambridge University Press.
  10. de Repentigny, L., Lewandowski, D., and Jolicoeur, P. (2004). Immunopathogenesis is oropharyngeal Candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17 (4): 729-759.
  11. Ekanem, I. E. (2008). Age dependent variation  in the density of candida albicans among females in Uyo metropolis. A B.SC research project submitted to the Department of microbiology, faculty of science, University of Uyo, Uyo.
  12. Enweani, I. B., Gugnani, H. C., Okobia, R., and Ojo, S. B. (2001). Effect of Contraceptives on the Prevalence of Vaginal Colonaization with Candida Species in Edo State Nigeria.Revista Iberoamericana de micologia 18; 171-173.
  13. Fidel, R.L.Jr; Cutright J; and Steele, C. (2000). Effects of reproductive hormornes on experimental vaginal candidiasis. Infection and immunity 68(2): 651-657.
  14. Foxman, B. (1990). The Epidemiology of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Risk Factors, Am J Public Health, 80:329-331
  15. Holland, J; Young, M.L; Lee, O; and Chen, S. (2003). Vulvovaginal carriage of yeasts other than candida albicans.Sexually transmitted infections 79: 290-294.
  16. Mokwena, T. A; Jensen Van renberry, E. and Myburgh, J. (2000).The isolation and classification of candida mokoengii SP. NOV.A new yeast from South African soil. Antonie Van leeuwenhook 77(1): 43-47.
  17. Mujica, M.T; Finquellevich, J.L; Jewtuchowicz, V; and Lovannitti, C.A. (2004). Prevalence ofCandida albicans and candid non-albicas in clinical sample during 1999-2001. Revista Angentina Microbiologia, 36 (3): 107-112.
  18. Na, D., Weiping, L., Enfeng, Z., Chan, W., Zhaozhao, X., Honghui, Z. (2014). Risk factors for candida infection of the genital tract in the tropics. African Health Sciences, 14 (4): 835-839
  19. Namkinga, L.A., Matee, M.I.N., Kivaisi A. K., Moshiro, C. (2005). Prevalence and risk factors for vaginal candidiasis among women Seeking primary care for genital infections in dar es salaam, Tanzania, East African Medical Journal, 82:3
  20. Namkinga, L.A., Matee, M.I.N., Kivaisi, A.K and Moshiro, C. (2005). Prevalence And Risk Factors For Vaginal Candidiasis Among Women Seeking Primary Care For Genital Infections In Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. East African Medical Journal, 82(3)
  21. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. (1991). Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol, 29(2):297–301.
  22. Nwadioha, S. I., Egah, D. Z., Alao, O. O and Iheanacho, E. (2010). Risk factors for vaginal candidiasis among women attending primary health care centers of Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Medicine and Research, 2(7): 110-113
  23. Omole-Ohonsi A, Mohammed Z, Ihesiulor U (2006). Vaginal discharge in Pregnancy in Kano, Nothern Nigeria. Nig. Med. Practitioner, 50: 68-71
  24. Paladine HL, Desai UA. (2018). Vaginitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician, 97(5):321–329.
  25. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. (2002). Role of sentinel surveillance of candidemia: trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility. J Clin Microbiol, 40(10): 3551-3557.
  26. Prescott, L.M., Harley, J.P., and Klein, D.A. (2002). Microbiology 5thedition. McGraw-Hill, PP. 949.
  27. Reed BD. (1992). Risk factors for Candida vulvovaginitis. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 47:551.
  28. Rodrigues FS, Peixoto S, Adami F, Alves Bda C, Gehrke Fde S, Azzalis LA, et al. (2015). Proposal of a new cutoff for Nugent criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Microbiol Methods, 115:144–6.
  29. Sobel JD, Faro S, Force RW, Fox B (1998). Vulvovaginal candidiasis. Epidemiologic, diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. America J. Obstetrics Gynecol, 178: 203-211
  30. Southerland, J. H; Taylor G. W; and Offenbacher, S. (2005). Diabetes and periodontal infection: making the connection. Clinical Diabetes, 23(4): 171-178.
  31. Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Acciano S, et al. (1999). Effect of antibiotic use on the prevalence of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999; 180(1): 14-17.
  32. Vallor AC, Antonio MA, Hawes SE, Hillier SL. (2001). Factors associated with acquisition of, or persistent colonization by, vaginal lactobacilli: role of hydrogen peroxide production. J Infect Dis. 184(11):1431–1436.
  33. Van Schalkwyk J, Yudin MH. (2015). Infectious Disease Committee. Vulvovaginitis: screening for and management of trichomoniasis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 37(3):266–74.